Why Cardiff’s Current Conduct re Blocking My Machine-Gun Trial Compensation

Chief Constable of South Wales Police
Police Head Quarters,
Bridgend
South Wales

7th September 2016

Dear Mr Vaughan,

machine-gun-cps-brief-to-jury

mg-uk-column-jan-09010

Machine gun 252x326.aspxMachine gun aspx

The antique was black when I purchased her on the DH2 1916 replica biplane, from a Dorset Air Museum, as opposed to the above 2nd photo back in the Lincolnshire museum, after trial. A single police officer from Wales (the regulations are a minimum of three armed officers plus 2nd vehicle should the first break down) returned with it by police car to Barbara Wilding’s boudoir to paint the now only partly black relic of the Somme just to match my video of it, incidentally, shown to the jury, on day of the aircraft sale more than a year earlier!

Barbara had the colour altered to try and fool the jury but on acquittal allowed it to be returned to Lincolnshire not even the same shade of colour as Mr Cooper had painted it within days of first buying.

(In the pub, immediately after the trial, nine of the jury were still quite bemused as to why was not both the seller to me and the buyer of a purported ‘prohibitive weapon’ not also up in the dock beside me? Curious and especially at the end of each day of the two week trial, my son watched some police officer picked up Prosecution Exhibit One, sling it over his shoulder to walk out alone onto a public pavement to strut slowly up the road back to some local police station).

The problem arose when 11 of the 12 jury decided NOT GUILTY on first day of evidence which ultimately led to her having to be returned to the museum that wrong colour. The 12th , speak to the rest of the jury, was clearly a police ‘plant’, the standard ploy in Cardiff Crown courts to feed info back, this time to judges Paul Thomas QC and Richard Thomlow, then the bent CPS prosecutor.

As an aside,  both Caspar and myself were quietly amused as to the ‘modus operandi’ of slimy fingers attached to those in positions of privilege and answerable to no one but their Maker.

We were both waiting , of course, for the police’s excuses for Exhibit One, an integral part of a British registered aircraft and critical to its C of G, for safe flight as well as being CAA documented in the certification documents, aircraft log books prominently displayed on the prosecutor’s table.

Both Richard Thomlow and Judge Paul Thomas QC, wash your mouth out, Maurice,  were fully aware of the conspiracy, for without them why would Barbara bother?

Thomlow was seen frantically trying to slip the airframe log book, without looking down for it, under his pile of prosecution papers as my enquiries were now dangerously leading embarrassingly in that direction as it was time for my  tea.

That is why, despite my paying thousands of pounds after the acquittal for my videoed statement of complaint recorded at Barry police station, South Wales Police or should I not say, Patrick, HM Partnership, refused me that, their court transcript, copy of exhibits, court log or police custody, IRIS and MAPPA records when the latter,  when drawn up , was again in the presence of their blackmailed Chief Forensic Psychiatrist for Wales, Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams.

dr-tegwyn-williams-wanted-poster

That is also why, including the switching of the sex of some police officer, code named ‘Foxy’ and hidden behind the witness box screen to also try and fool the jury, could not be  properly cross examined by me for fear the earlier telephone call, when she (not a he) rang my then wife, trying to acquire the Lewis,  before being part of the 2nd hit squad of ‘Operation Tulip’ or was it Buttercup, to snatch our then 10 year old little daughter,  Genevieve, after the police and twenty odd , many armed police had left the scene in their ridiculous ‘Operation Chalice’ public scandal.

Any excuse for yet another Sunday over time paid ‘joy ride’ in Barbara’s  taxpayer paid for new helicopter just to chase me. (That is why HHJ Seys Llewelyn QC struck out my civil claim as the pilots and or crew would surely be implicated again in more unlawful conduct and why the machine-gun claim has been blocked by the same judge, for well over six years or be allowed a jury hearing in England.

So Barbara Wilding authorised her being painted black, to match my You tube video made on day of sale to museum for jury to see ( prosecution exhibit 2) to the original grey the new owner had painted her.

Ah, but when I took statements, well over a year later, from the museum I was told by all in the aircraft hangar she had even came back, after that ridiculous trial with  criminal HHJ Judge Paul Thomas,  a different shade of grey to what the new owner had painted her on purchase.

That is the real state of our Welsh law courts, but do you care, Mr Vaughan?

peter-vaughan

Your HM Partnership is designed to fleece the unsuspecting general public under the myth surrounding the very lucrative world of HM and if it was not for Brexit, we could quash it.

Incidentally, I have come into the possession of information concerning a Dr Hillier of Caswell Clinic from a former patient which appears to directly relate to whatever evidence was presented by Judge Richard Thomlow in Cardiff Crown Court, without me, in order to both avoid the 2010 machine-gun trial, due in a few days and other pending alleged related MAPPA category 3 level 3 crimes from ‘going public’ but, instead, to have me locked away for life without even a trial.

I believe the current level of criminal activity now being occasioned in your Cardiff law courts, to cover up the above conspiracy, urgently requires the invitation of an outside police force being called in to investigate. Even the Criminal Cases Review Commission and IPCC have been gagged.

16-09-07-amended-parole-board-particulars-of-claim-c90cf012

As you know I have had to leave your area for health reasons and due to your adverse control over both the Vale of Glamorgan’s general practitioners and hospital specialists, being at a level quite unimaginable anywhere else in the United Kingdom, I was neglected in your various prisons by your South Wales Police repeatedly preventing my pre-arranged hospital appointments being kept.
You will recall that on more than six occasions your police denied my attending both civil and criminal courts in Cardiff as each of the cases related to my civil actions against your continuing the bullying that your predecessor was also so extremely good at.

You are also aware that there are a number of other civil damages claims still outstanding against both yourself and NHS (Wales) and in particular implicating other clinical staff who are still at your controlled Caswell Clinic medium secure psychiatric hospital based in Bridgend.

Remember, despite a direct invitation by Dr Gaynor Jones, involving a Dr Ruth Bagshaw and others, I was promptly arrested on arrival at the Caswell Clinic, gaoled for ‘attempted burglary’ and other typical nonsense allegations only for all charges, once again, being dropped once matters had been sufficiently protracted for my maximum harm, of course, in a closed court, of course and refused police data pertaining to it, of course, all routine on an Englishman so stupid to have set foot in the Principality in so south a location.

Your predecessor, Ms Barbara Wilding, had me incarcerated there for the maximum term, under s35 of the 1983 Mental Health Act, in the hope I would finally accept medication and therefore lawfully transferred to Ashworth high security psychiatric hospital for an indefinite period.

Upon my release from prison, following the acquittal without even the need of defence evidence, both Wilding’s 2009 fabricated sworn affidavit and the allegation of my ‘trading in machine-guns’ and numerous other MAPPA3/3 related charges, all require an outside police’s intervention as it is becoming obvious that your similarly controlled Cardiff County Court has no intention in my subsequent civil claim being allowed the light of day yet alone with the facts before a jury.

Cardiff County Court’s repeated refusal to transfer my subsequent claims to either an English court or for your conspiracy, needing both Dr Tegwyn Williams and Professor Rodger Wood to be investigated, is an abuse of process. The police led 2nd December 2009 Crown Court application, that I be incarcerated in Ashworth for life, still remains your responsibility and disclosure of its data.

In October 2013 I visited Barry police station to lay further information only to be gaoled without an arrest for over an hour while senior welsh police officers pleaded with Dr Tegwyn Williams’ lawyer, in London, to persuade his reluctant client to make another false complaint and making, for sure, no Cardiff court would, again, process my legal aid applications or allow my documents in the court.

Not dissimilar to the 2nd aborted jury trial incident, is it, of a ‘breach of a restraining order ‘ never served in the first place? Dr TW signed a witness statement that police had prevented my burning his and Dr Hillier’s house down when you all knew the allegation was a figment of his imagination after too many years with you lot, I presume, with your day to day nefarious conduct continuing to be unchecked unless Brexit can be overturned

The doctors are down in New Zealand we are all told where a contingency, on my behalf and for other aggrieved parties, are planning to visit to find more on the police back-mail that caused this inconvenience to both me and my family to have happened in the first place.

I require from you the details of your past chief forensic psychiatrist’s solicitor and current one, if need be, as I intend travelling to London to see him or her this Friday in order that your refusing to allow my NHS (Wales) medical records from ever being released may be resolved ‘out of court’.

You very well know that without those medical records being redacted, completely expunged from the record or facing a further scrutiny in the 4th jury trial, in the matter, I cannot successfully re-apply for my commercial pilot’s licences, the return of my police confiscated shot guns and hold appropriate gun certificates or become, again, a member of the veterinary profession before I leave for on my convoluted journey, this November, around the world.

Yours faithfully,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Copy to Ms Rebecca Pow MP of the Vale of Taunton

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Taunton’s MP Ms Rebecca Pow Told of the Current State of Welsh Law Courts

Ms Rebecca Pow,
MP for the Vale of Taunton, Somerset.

2th September 2016

Dear Ms Pow,

HMC&TS Malfeasance

I have recently moved back to the West Country where I was born, educated, worked and incidentally, married at your own local church in Stoke St Mary.

My purpose was, primarily, to restore my failing health due to being unable to obtain proper medical services in South Wales owing to the intransigence amongst a string of NHS (Wales) doctors. Each refused to stand-up to either Chief Forensic Psychiatrist for Wales, a Dr Tegwyn Williams, now sacked or his co-conspirator, a Professor Rodger Wood of Swansea University, due his fabricated medical records as well.

They had been requested by a Barbara Wilding, the then Chief Constable of the South Wales Constabulary, following legal advice from Dolmans, solicitors, that her own fabricated soon to be heard ‘machine -gun trial, carrying in itself a minimum ten prison sentence, for me, was doomed and I needed, instead, to be incarcerated, indefinitely, in a high security psychiatric hospital in order for her to avoid the ongoing civil litigation from affecting her final pension.

Cardiff Court staff first fabricated evidence, as long ago as 2002, in that I was a potential ‘vexatious litigant’ and therefore the needing for HM Court & Tribunal Service (Wales) to send many, if not all, of my court files to HM Solicitor-General’s office in Whitehall for registration. The files primarily concerned my local civil and criminal litigation in the Welsh courts involving my suing the police for incessant bullying. This regime of theirs has led to the loss of many files being lost, some believe on purpose, in order to further frustrate and delay my right of ‘remedy’ through our UK courts of law.

I have also returned to Taunton to retrieve my ‘general state of mind’ in an environment more conducive to my up-bringing and life style and to finally get away from the twenty-four years of South Wales Police persecution following their apparent immunity to any form accountability as the result of their considerable fabricated prosecution evidence concocted over the years.

However, my need to contact my local Member of Parliament is for a more serious a reason in that I am now in possession of considerable evidence of wide spread malfeasance within the Cardiff’s judiciary which has implicated both the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons, in the past and continues to have a such serious impact on my family wherever I or they should be.

HMC&TS (Wales) have ‘lost’:

1. Numerous Cardiff County Court files, court exhibits and court logs or refuse to disclose

2. numerous Cardiff Crown Court files with some also confiscated by the South Wales police

3. numerous Cardiff Magistrate’s court clerks’ contemporaneous notes, records of evidence, court exhibits, pages from the official court logs and the documentary evidence of both Crown Prosecution Service and Geoamey Custodial Services’ applications to confirm that would also confirm my never having received a ‘restraining order’ in the court cells of the Magistrates courts on 1st December 2011.

4. The latest, my reason for writing to you as it really is the ‘last straw’, is that the Cardiff County Court clerk is ‘unable’ to supply me with a copy of a purported October 2015 250 odd page ‘handed-down’ judgment, involving all the above nefarious activities and much, much more, besides, that had been, purportedly, emailed to me in order for me to immediately appeal its content.

5. As with the Magistrates public records needing to be disclosed, that will, alone, overturn well over three years of my prison sentences, likewise, the immediate disclosure of County Court logs, recovery of its exhibits and my police custody records will allow my being able to practice veterinary surgery once again as the truth will finally be revealed over ridiculous criminal convictions and fairy tale that two dogs had ever fallen over a cliff in the first place.

6. I seek an appointment, please, in order for that you may be made further aware, with Brexit now being a serious possibility and neither lawyers nor HM court staff any longer needing to be accountable for their actions.

7. This has partly come about due to politicians’ lawyers’ abusive 1989 Human Rights Act by someone, we know, deliberately having omitted both Articles 1 and 13 of what was original drafted to avoid ‘remedy’ for someone like myself.

Yours sincerely

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Maurice@kirkflyingvet.com
Tel. 0770858620

——————————————————————————

Ms Rebecca Pow,
MP for the Vale of Taunton, Somerset.

6th September 2016

Dear Ms Pow,

HMC&TS Malfeasance

Dear Madam,

The current Secretary of State for Wales, Alun Cairns Esq, his predecessors as my Vale of Glamorgan MPs, both John Smith Esq and Walter Sweeney Esq, have ALL been copied into much correspondence since the 90s when my old friend, Walter, opened only the 4th veterinary hospital in Wales despite it being at the height of my South Wales persecution.

This lead to my being goaled for suspect trading in machine-guns which just happened to have been used at the Farnborough Air Show bolted to my replica 1916 DH2 registered as part of a British airframe by the Civil Aviation Authority.

Feed back since my 2nd September 2016 letter to you has reminded me that even when an Inspector Andrew Rice, of Barry police station, was also seen in my court room by a Christopher Paul Ebbs (alias Chris Alexander) during his examination in the witness box RICE denied knowing of an incident when I had arrested the Crown Prosecutor, Stan Sofa.

Despite the trial judge, His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC, in the civil damages claim, pointed out RICE had been present at court that day as his collar number had been recorded in the official court records, still the claim was ignored.

The incident included Mr Sofa dangling by the scruff of his neck as I held him up and unable to run away with the fabricated evidence only to watch, RICE snatch from him the Crown Prosecution file from under the court official’s arm before many in court making a be line for the door with it in front of the many police officers that had attended.

The Barry magistrates hearing had been a radar-trap incident of speeding with me in the dock when the true driver of the vehicle was known to the police all along proved by his photo floating out of the file for which RICE had been called by the Chief Constable to hush -up.

EXACTLY the same incident was repeated and in the very same building when yet another police fabricated incident collapsed in similar ignominy.

I had been accused in smuggling pigs into Ireland under the Prevention of Terrorism Act and yes, it was either Inspector Hill or RICE again who rushed into the court, at that very moment, to snatch the court file, this time, the CPS prosecutor, Mr Mundy, especially imported from London.

There were 33 odd incidents in the first of 10 claims yet to be heard but here in Wales no one appears to care less as to the conduct of their police, CPS and judges, all looking for autonomy, which is why I am so pleased to be out of that very evil place.

Enclosed, later, a witness statement re RICE on his theft by RICE of one of my veterinary hospital vehicles.

????

????

Yours faithfully,

Marie J Kirk BVSc

——————————————————————————

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

4th of 10 Actions Against South Wales Police Immune to Prosecution when Tried in Their Own Controlled Welsh Courts

Tegwyn’s ‘Nigger in the Wood pile’

Wood.png

The deceitful Professor Rodger Wood of Swansea University who fabricated facts in my Caswell NHS (Wales) medical records to assist in my Ashworth  incarceration only to redact and alter them as I had exposed both CPS and police corruption in my machine-gun trial with nine of jury then stating, afterwards, there was a police informer amongst them

The guidance on applying a ‘restraining order’ on Maurice Kirk

Making an application

Whilst a court can make a restraining order of its own volition, prosecutors also have an obligation to remind sentencing courts of the option of making a restraining order, including when the defendant has been acquitted.

The procedural rules for making applications are set out in Part 50 of the Criminal Procedure Rules. These apply in both the magistrates’ court and the Crown Court.

It is important that sufficient notice is given to a defendant when an application for a restraining order is made. In R v K [2011] EWCA Crim 1843 the court ruled that a person to whom a restraining order is directed should be given a proper notice, an opportunity to consider what is proposed and to make representations at a hearing.

The need to give the defendant an opportunity to address the court whether a restraining order was necessary was again endorsed in R v Trott (Peter) [2011] EWCA Crim 2395. The Crown offered no evidence and a formal verdict of not guilty was entered by the court. The Crown then applied for a restraining order. The judge remarked that the defendant should never been charged or committed but nevertheless granted a restraining order so as to prevent further trouble. The defendant appealed on the grounds that the judge had erred in law in imposing a restraining order and alternatively erred in identifying the factual basis for it. The court cited R v Major [2010] EWCA Crim 3016 and R v K and ruled that the procedure followed by the court denied the defendant an opportunity to make any representations and accordingly quashed the restraining order.

Why the Machine-Gun Civil Claim MUST be Stopped and Court Records  Shredded

This old 2007 claim for police’s continuing to bully, simply to frustrate the first three of my actions against them from ever getting to a civil trial originally started in the early 90s. The first three contain around 33 of well over, it must be, 150 malicious police incidents by now and only achieved by their withholding their records from any court as in England.

Now dramatically amended particulars ( See below) because of many reasons, as in the first three cases, my witnesses have died off, mentally ill or have emigrated with bulk unable to be found after 20 years!

The 30 odd, in this amended 4th Action, are mainly incidents omitted from within the first three’s time scale due to the usual failed police disclosure of the facts recorded in each occurrence numbered record stored in Barry police station.  The Cardiff courts will stop at nothing to further delay my remedy, this civil action for damages before a jury as with the  2009 dreamed-up Chief Constable’s Machin-Gun/MAPPA conspiracy  to falsely have me imprisoned and sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act as MAPPA 3/3 victim of the state for life.

I have been slow to realise His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC has blocked its progress, personally, for 7 years based on the spurious argument I must have due to being so deaf, oh the court system cannot cope with so many claims from one person!!!! Mr Kirk, I now remember it say, you will have wait for the 1st , 2nd ,3rd , 4th and 5th claims have been settled before ;machine -gun case can progress!

What a load of bollocks….I had asked all my cases be transferred to England for all the bloody obvious reasons and refused every time for fear police disclosure would happen.

HHJ Seys llewellyn QC

The Cardiff court appears to have also pulled another flanker recently and an exact repeat to its ‘mythical 1st Dec 2011 restraining order service on me in a court cell’!

Then, again, by hiding the truth by corrupting court tapes, losing my files and court exhibits, refusing release of both civil and criminal court logs or even allowing police to keep confiscated exhibits so the jury can never see them then nothing will stop for the next time with their arrogance and inherent deceit.

. Nothing is sacred in the Principality, remember, except for their quite un checked expenses perks, civil service and lucrative police pension funds.

Pulled a flanker, alright, by now telling the Royal Courts of Justice I am far too late to appeal to them as I received a ‘sealed judgment’ in October 2015 which is, in fact, quite untrue.

The court refuses to disclose how then, exactly, sight of the police corrected version of the Judges non approved version or even sight of  the court log—-deja vu Guernsey’s Royal Court, RCVS hearing, Cardiff magistrates?

Reminds me rather of, ref RCVS RCJ ‘corrupted court tapes’, before Lord Justice Thomas over the sensitive matter of the college not wishing to admit, in law, it can not, ‘out of hand’ simply deny a veterinary surgeon his right to have his application, to be restored to the register, heard properly considered by a court.

The ECHR had already been tipped off with the legendry Ms K Reed (UK) in Strasbourg writing back and stating the Court of Human Rights will not consider any further applications in relation to the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons —breath-on ‘HM Partnership’, as Patrick Cullinane Esq terms the cartel but with Brexit, unless a 2nd referendum, then their future conspiring against my children  and yours is well assured.

151026 Approved SWP Judgment KIRK v SWP

Some samples from the truth behind some of these 33 incidents

Action 1 claim 8.6, 20 May 1993 arrest at Grand Avenue Cardiff. with no less than a dozen, my son Caspar tells me, of pre PACE 1984 gross infringements on a prisoner not even cautioned for an offensive weapon which is one of the reasons the ‘purported’ interview tape has just surfaced, no doubt, well doctored.

93 05 20 Interview Tape

93 05 00 Grand Ave Surgery Arrest

Action 2 claim 2-9th Feb1996 flight to Ireland  ‘smuggling pigs’ Chris Ebbs  alias Chris Alexander told the police causing the case to collapse having already warning London CPS lawyer, for the Anti- Terrorism squad of the ‘can of worms’ Cardiff courts can be so often.

Action 2 claim 5 2nd Oct 1997 speed camera St Nicholas F  The practice ambulance caught speeding in excess of 90 mph , was it, see official Seys Llewellyn QC judgment that MUST never ever get to the RCJ. Stopped, apparently, to confirm it changed registered ownership, I think, three times in as many months from Marriane Fanshaw to Joseph F Bloggins to Amey Johnson or was it Buzz Aldrin., anything to delay the Welsh police shysters blocking my insurance in order to stop me working for the funds to fight them.

95 05 15 PCs Matin & Obrian photo

Action 1 claim 8.26 6 June 1995 the Gafael incident..doc

Action 2 claim 7 – 4 July 1999 the police helicopter Now that is what I call real danger! helicopter rotor blades less than 50 ft of my aircraft, the length of the court room, at low level and without radio contact… and.should of seen the state of my mate, Andy,  in the front-seat, having only the week before obtained his private pilot’s licence!

Action 2 claim 6-16 16th March 1998 Southay Street Holmes Now this one was fun, with all relevant police records being expunged once damages were claimed for.

Action 2 claim 11 stop at junction of Newport Road and Albany Road Cardiff 5 April 200  The classic doctoring of police controlled videos —a ‘high speed car chase’ well caught on You tube showing how the main violence of the clumsily redacted assault by PC Osborne footage was clip out of how  he actually had dragged me out of somebody’s car, the Arch-Bishop’s ?

Local lawyers, meantime, [over one hundred to date] are all ordered not to act for me except in the  machine-gun criminal trial, of course, in order to cover -up the truth of the Chief Constable’s personal intervention after her court ordered to sign her own Dolmans, solicitors, fabricated 26th Feb 2009 sworn affidavit.

So what does she do, immediately hand in her notice to preserve her lucrative pension  by sectretly black-mailing poor old Tegyn Williams to have me registered MAPPA 3/3 so I may be ‘lawfully’ shot when trying to exchange the civil action witness statements.

When  she saw, plan B, the machine-gun trial was doomed and then, in panic, having the antique gun painted another colour to try and fool the jury and  falsified ‘Foxy’ telephone calls from the Barry police station pretending to want to buy my other one they never found in order to divert the flaws in the first lot of indictments.

When wicked Dolmans paid for by you, with your payments exempt from FOI I have since found out from a Mackenzie Friend, then warns her I may not use their chosen lawyer  to defend me, de bono, in the trial carrying its 10 year mandatory prison sentence.

South Wales Police greed

Adrian Oliver Dolmans

wanted-poster

Wilding Wanted

[Was it really true the filming, shown to the well switched on jury, was done after an afternoon out with the dogs rabbit shooting so vividly portrayed on websites and my You tube site?]

Lawyers especially also refuse to me help me when any police incident reveals it to be HMC&TS that is implicated or culpable of some impropriety, putting it mildly! All are  immune in Wales to any prosecution, even GBH as in Derick Hasan’s case when breaking my leg while trying to stop me getting copies of 1st Dec 2011 medical and court records used before HHJ Neil Bidder QC to get me to Ashworth for life.

Same records as used by Judge John Curran QC who openly lied to the jury (see transcript below) that there was no cctv recorded in the camera fitted no 3 cell ‘for psychos and very  dangerous prisoners)or clerk’s notes of evidence and applications, all subject to appeal, kept of 1st Dec 12 quite farcical court hearing BUT proving  Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams, court officers and certain Geomey staff were lying with impunity.

Don’t worry,  after Brexit, heaven forbid, the spineless’ small minded’ amongst them will have a field-day and at the public’s serious loss. Our judiciary requires European intervention right now or replacement of our greed driven system by the modern versions  of what we were once proud of when exporting it to our colonies.

16 08 26 Appl Adj 7 days Claimant Position Statement

16 08 31witness stmt

the why this was not heard earlier was that I had been tricked into believing it would be heard before a jury and by granting me one only for police to not allow a jury was extly the tactic often see unfold in Guernsey when delaying each case an extra two years as in this one, five years, machine-gun case seven years, so far, anything to withhold the truth from the usual unsuspecting jury or Joe Bloggs.

16 08 26 Particulars of 4th Claim 7CF07345

THE CCRC have now admitted the court file content is significantly not what it was each time the Commission examines  it over these past six years

You must understand, ladies and gentlemen, this is only a war of attrition, except I am still breathing, as that is what they always do in time immemorial anything for ‘white collar’  to cover up their day to day antics at the tax payer’s usual expense.

No great mystery as my  ‘gate arrest’, on release from 1st Dec 2011 cell in my wheel chair, for failing to attend the Musa case, as I was denied attending by Cardiff prison, two days before,from direct orders of police, as the ‘restraining order’ may of been the piece of paper 5 angry Geoamey guards were seen on video trying to stuff down my sock as they dragged me from my court cell and dumped me, unceremoniously, in the Cardiff magistrates corridor for the awaiting police to take me to London court.

Even from in prison I finally managed to get a message to get my sister of this transcript before it was redacted or their usual ‘corrupted’ ploy

05 02 RO Trial T20120090 – kirk – All proeedings – 04.05.12

Lee Barker , the court accepted, served the restraining order on me into my hand before 1500 hours and in the presence of at least four other guards and the clerk of the court.

For five years I have been trying to get various law firms to acquire the police custody file to no avail.

Any ideas, any one?

 

To be continued

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Sabine McNeil Now Released from Custody

I am in Brittany and just received a message that Sabine McNeil is in custody in some police cell in east London

What for and for why I do not know but if anyone is out there living near Highbury Corner Magistrates for 9.30am please be there.

ps They often pull a fast one on sensitive cases by switching courts and times at the last moment as they did last time I tried to get there in Wood Green.

~the little birdie sent the enclosed concerning Dr Tegwyn Williams and Professor Rodger Wood both immune to prosecution for what they have done to me.

A REMARKABLE COINCIDENCE

Just received this from Sabine’s storing of data most of which I have no memory for except I wrote it all on a prison type writer, apparently!!!!

OODLES of back ground to the use and abuse by UK authorities reliant on the hurriedly drafted 1997 Harassment Act where the simple defence to an act of alleged harassment is either due to it was detecting or preventing criminal conduct and in my cases proved to be so with conspiracies found right across the South Wales judicial and executive infrastructure.

Alas, in my cases, some of those in Caswell Clinic, Swansea University, NHS (Wales) and of course , the South Wales Police were found to be liars.

….no previous jury, in my last three cases, were ever allowed to know these simple facts of a defence for fear Dr Tegwyn Williams may have to face my cross examination that has always been blocked by a corrupt judiciary that is, in Wales at least, each time his evidence was needed to prolong my incarceration to prejudice the 250 arch lever file civil claim I had brought to try and finally get the inherently deceitful and spineless little small  minded pieces of shyte off my back.

If it had not been for the likes of Sabine McNeil helping me, whilst I was in prison, I would have gone under many years ago and which may be why, with her helping so many as myself, the lady is intended to be both mentally and physically broken by the ‘powers that be’ in such an antiquated evil UK HM judicial system now under the real threat of Brexit, so not to be radically reformed but allowed to trundle on stealing the tax payer’s money no longer answerable even to Europe.

Do you know the Welsh authorities even supported the South Wales Police orders to my numerous prisons to  blocked all Sabine’s telephone calls to me and even when I was being denied urgent access to a pre arranged Cardiff hospital for an internal examination following the direct order of the current Chief Constable , David Vaughan

peter vaughan

Sabine seen trying to help me outside Cardiff Prison gates to be allowed to get urgent court files to me into my cell…..the lady failed that time but came back fighting with an army of Mackenzie Friends

20140224_164719[1]

A ‘poster’ in trouble as it tells of truth, sadly, a rare commodity in South Wales law courts.

wanted-poster

WANTED: Dr Tegwyn Williams, accused of falsifying medical records to obtain imprisonment without trial http://wp.me/p10VNs-Bk

THE CASWELL CLINIC DOCTOR I AM NOW BEING TOLD PROVOKED TEGWYN TO RUN WITH THE POLICE TO STOP THE ALREADY ILL FATED MACHINE-GUN JURY TRIAL GOING AHEAD BY SWITCHING IT INSTEAD TO DEALING KIRK WITH THE WELSH VERSION OF THE ‘GULAG CARD’ TO LOCK HIM AWAY FOR LIFE WITHOUT NEED OF ANY PUBLIC TRIAL

DAVID ROGER THOMAS

CURRICULUM VITAE

PERSONAL DETAILS  see google

Name:                                      David Roger THOMAS

14 Lake Road East

ROATH PARK

CARDIFF CF2 5NN

( 07970 812342

Criminal Court of Appeal 201402428 C1

County Court BS614159

HM Crown Prosecution Service

Maurice Kirk A7306AT Cardiff HMP Cardiff

South Wales

Your Ref: A20140082 (Bristol Crown Court) 5th June 2014

Dear Sir,

Arrest of HM Prosecutor DAVID GARETH EVANS

Abuse of Youth Justice & Criminal Evidence ct 1999

  1. I have now had the opportunity to listen to the alarming tape recording of 1st December 2011 Cardiff Magistrates proceedings, with District Judge John Charles presiding, where I stood accused of harassment of a NHS (Wales) police psychiatrist from Caswell Clinic, Bridgend. My need follows successive courts having refused to disclose, to Crown Court juries, the clerk of the courts notes and custody records of your victim.
  2. I say alarming because, before this date, I was unable to comprehend what was taped without my yesterday’s newly fitted hearing aid to allow it and the fact that I had been forced to conduct the defence from behind bullet prove glass without even legal papers or the appropriate legal representation.
  3. The tape’s graphic detail includes, it appears, that I was to be legally represented that day but my solicitor had failed to arrive. The judge produced the lawyer’s letter but would not divulge its content. But did the CPS see it?
  4. The solicitor, I now know, had written to the court with legal argument of ‘no case to answer’ which was later supported by a barrister stating that the prosecution was, in effect, an ‘abuse of process’ as the police doctor had lied.
  5. The 8th November 11 magistrates letter had refused me witness summonses being served relating to the earlier abuses of the YJCE Act, as in 2nd Nov 10 hearing, by this very same district judge. That hearing was in my absence due to ill health and related to my having been pushed down the Crown Court steps to suffer a broken leg by an ex South Wales policeman, Derrick Hasan.
  6. On the 9th Nov 11 I received an ‘amended’ overlooked charge for an already served custodial offence and police officer undated 2nd statement. The latter referred to my futile visits to Cardiff police stations to lay information, by way of witness statements, that this prosecuting constabulary had earlier re painted a decommissioned WWI Lewis machine gun to fool a Crown Court jury.
  7. Recorder of Cardiff’s 14th November 11 ruling also refers to abuse of process.
  8. Likewise, for her ladyship’s understanding in August 2013 hearing, the 3rd jury trial needed first my cross examination of barrister David Gareth Evans.
  9. Either your lawyers or police, since the 1st December 2012 ‘harassment’ shambles could have established my innocence by simple access to the other court, custody and medical records as well those referred to in:
  1. Appeal from harassment conviction on 1st March 2012 and1st blocked JR
  2. 1st Criminal Court of Appeal application following The Recorder of Cardiff’s ruling for HM Prosecution to produce medical records & 2nd JR
  3. 1st ‘breach’ of a restraining order May 12 jury trial
  4. 2nd ‘breach’ of a restraining order November 12 jury trial
  5. 1st ‘breach’ of a restraining order May 12 jury trial
  6. 2nd Criminal Court of Appeal hearing in March 12
  7. 3rd ‘breach’ of a restraining order March 14 jury trial or
  8. any future alleged breach of a restraining order trials
  1. The first jury asked for the clerk’s notes, CCTV and GEOamey custody records but was refused by the trial judge. I was never notified of this request or even had knowledge of the jury notes until many months after the trial.
  2. This was not until I had become suspicious as to just why I could not be supplied with the Crown Court log or transcript of what really went on during my forced absence while receiving medical attention.
  3. The second jury were denied anything at all as the police routine was always been detain me for as long legislation allowed, to adversely affect my civil damages claims against them, before withdrawing all charges.
  4. Similarly the third jury was denied David Evans’ evidence, the previous court records and exhibits and jury notes because the police had confiscated the lot.
  1. Crown Court’s Order, via 26th March 2012 Cardiff Magistrates legal manager letter, explains why no subsequent court can disclose to any jury as to whether or not a restraining order was served on anyone before I was granted release.

To avoid a 4th jury trial, simply over undisclosed court and medical records, referred to in my 28th Nov 2013 letter to the Chief Constable and withheld defence statements from the trial judge, His Honour Judge Rowlands QC, then may I suggest both Dr Tegwyn Williams and David Gareth Evans cooperate by each making statements as what really caused the application for my being sent to Ashworth, indefinitely and as to really why the prosecuting barrister offered himself to be a my witness mid trial.

Yours faithfully

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Copies to Criminal Appeals Office

His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC

NO ANSWER TO THIS LETTER OF COURSE AND CAUSING, OF COURSE, EVEN TO HAVE NO APPEAL BEFORE A JUDGE IN MY 3rd BREACH CONVICTION.

 AND WHO OUT THERE WAS EVER HEARD OF MY LONG 2012 IMPRISONMENT UNCONVICTED FOR MY  2nd PLANNED JURY TRIAL FOR BREACH OF A PIECE OF PAPER NEVER SERVED ON ME IN THE FIRST PLACE ? NO, I bet YOU HAVE NOT-THAT was kept well out of the news as police knew Dr Williams had made up the incident completely.

DR TEGWYN WILLIAMS HAD LIED YET AGAIN AND NOW CONFIRMED IN Cardiff CPS letter by Tony Dicken in which he confirms police were called to Dr Tegwyn Williams house ‘to move me on’ while I was there to burn it down with five gallons of avgas or was it mogas you were told by whom, Mr Dicken?

I saw, whilst in custody and refused a copy of Tegwyn Williams ‘ signed statement’ stating something like that in your letter and one from his wife am now told, Dr ?, of their complaint  dated in JUNE or JULY 2012.

A Complete tissue of lies, once again, was it not, Mr Dicken, I have experienced so often in your law courts as an Englishman trying to practice veterinary medicine in in South Wales.

Is that why, Mr Dicken, the South Wales Police had me gaoled in all those prisons around England and Wales for months and months, to further frustrate the civil hearing, that 2012 term with your lot never intending of ever taking the case to court, of course, as these evil little lying little types also knew I had never even been to Dr Tegwyn Williams’ house nor did I have the remotest idea where he lived or wished to know.

BUT you HM CPS lot, also immune to prosecution, usually, in Capital Tower in the centre next to Dolmans, this civil case made you lot in potential trouble with what was coming out of Seys Llewellyn QC ‘s ridiculous trial with me denied public and MAPPA records.

”’HAVE YOU READ THE 250 odd PAGES OF A ‘DOG’s Dinner’ — the judgment… anything to cover your colleagues day to day oiling of the tax payer funded gravy train.

I arrested CPS Stan SOFA , remember and Inspector Andrew Rice who arrived just to confiscate the ccps file of yet another collapsed corruptly put together  one (a mirroe image of the ‘smuggling pigs in Ireland case charged under the Anti-terrorism Act….Seys Llewllyn QC ignored that gross malfeasance of so many in the roonm when sgt hil or Andrew Rice ,again,  rushed in only to confiscate that CPS file

Dear old Brian Rix could mad a meal of that one as the HM Court staff ran a mile while I tried to grab pc murphy by the scruff for falsifying my aviation records during the court recess,

 I can imagine the temporary traffic lights set up,  during the civil trial between your CPS office tower and Adrian Oliver of Dolmans office in rush hour, central Cardiff, with hoards of clerks and police men scurrying to dodge the traffic all loaded up  with huge piles of court files to shred or burn and alter all rushing back and forth to both  offices across the street to further prevent more damge of the general public becoming aware of ‘what really goes on in our law courts.

Why do you think the police, in my 3rd breach jury trial in March 2014 with Judge Roland, spent all that time on the phone calls baiting me due to my accent and living be different standards,

AND the malicious phone call I am supposed to have made when well over the limit!

Why do you think the police withheld all those phone calls from the jury and me and YOU to prosecute me?

Why do you think the police waited until I walked down the main Barry street that night and bought too much alcohol due to your bread and butter bastards, you must always keep in with, filmed me to  the shop and back and waited for me too drink far too much and go to  asleep on the setee in Tynewydd Road?

 For sufficient time for their ‘agent provocateur’ to wake me up and provoking a tape for the 3rd jury

So bring on the 4th jury, Tony and let us see how many corrupt little bastards in your cess pit of a work place all clambering for judicial autonomy for self centred extra power all at the community’s loss

BUT only if you let the next jury, as the last two were not allowed to see ‘bugger all’, see:

  1.  the complete court records of the 1st December 2011 harassment of dr TW conviction before judge Charles and
  2.  those of the Crown Prosecution Service and
  3.  Geoamey Custodial Services and
  4. South Wales Police of my immediate gate arrest while in my wheel chair and
  5. and for the clerk, Mike Williams, Lee Barker, Dr Williams, CPS prosecutor, David Gareth Evans be called as witnesses and
  6. Ms Thomas from the Criminal Cases Review Commission who has nut an bolt step by step, by now, on how judges in Cardiff aided the re writing of so many court case records over the last 24 years to protect the joint pensions of their cosy relationship with the south Wales Police refusing throughout the past 20 years of release the standard record a prisoner from the moment he is targeted for bullying.

This document will bee 100 pages long if you give me time to write it on a computer?

    (BS614159-MC65)

S Ampem Esq                                                                                              (1CF03546)                 

The Criminal Appeal Office                                                      Maurice Kirk A7306AT

London                                                                                                        HMP Cardiff

England                                                                                                        South Wales

WC2A 2LL

29th May 2014

My ref:      A7306AT

Your Ref:  201402428 C1                                                     Cardiff Crown T20131144

Dear Sir,

R v MAURICE JOHN KIRK    

Appeal re 3rd ‘Breach’ of Restraining Order Conviction

PREVIOUS GROUNDS INCLUDE

  1. Refused medical attention throughout custody
  2. Refused bail/HDC despite granted in principle
  3. Refused process of legal aid form
  4. Refused access to lawyer in custody
  5. Refused access to legal papers in custody
  6. Refused glasses in court
  7. Refused access to copy court tape/tape record/court log
  8. Refused access to legal papers in court
  9. Refused right to interview defence witnesses in custody
  10. Refused access to own funds for preparation whilst in custody
  11. Refused outstanding relevant appeals/applications to be heard first
  12. Refused adjournment/change indictments/re trail re mid trial judge’s direction
  13. Refused the right to call defence witnesses
  14. Refused the right to cross examine
  15. Refused opening address
  16. Refused ‘no case to answer’ submission
  17. Refused ‘abuse of process’ application
  18. Refused ‘bad character’ opposition submission
  19. Refused adjournment re switching of trials
  20. Refused compensation re switched trial withdrawn#
  21. Refused prevention of police confiscating court exhibits
  22. Refused prevention of police causing passport confiscation
  23. Refused prevention by police to prevent assaults in prison
  24. Refused trial transfer outside Cardiff to prevent defence witness intimidation
  25. Refused both primary and Sect 8 police disclosure despite promises over 22 years, by countless judges, magistrates, South Wales Police and CPS staff
  26. response to applications made to HMC&TS in Cardiff Courts

AND there was relevant misdirection of both HM Prosecutor and jury.

SAMPLE OF FAILED PRE TRIAL DISCLOSURE

  1. Refused named lawyer, whist in police custody, because ‘not on the list’
  2. Refused in interview, under caution, as to why complainant’s UK solicitor, on 4th October 14, had expressed his client’s reluctance for another jury trial
  3. Refused copy of interview DVD (still refused facilities to even view it)
  4. Refused both witnesses and legal papers at magistrates committal proceedings
  5. Refused BAIL again based on fabricated and distorted antecedent history
  6. Refused facilities to defend following Nov County Court’s directions to prison
  7. Refused copy of 3rd Jan 14 Crown Court YJCE Act CPS legal submissions
  8. Refused BAIL despite HHJ Neil Bidder QC’s directions to find a bail hostel
  9. Refused Home Detention Curfew (HDC) tagging with no reason given.

SAMPLE OF FAILED DISCLOSURE DURING TRIAL

  1. Refused ‘arrest’ data on  Barry Police Station CCTV, PNBs & Reception logs due to hour’s imprisonment prior to 14th October 14 arrest of their victim
  2. Refused BAIL despite HHJ Bidder QC’s 3rd Jan 14 directions to find a hostel
  3. Refused Home Detention Curfew (HDC) tagging following conviction

Despite receiving 2nd May 14 HDC Eligibility Notice, on the16th, the prisoner is again refused release (ON LICENCE), on 29th May 14, following directions from a Governor Sarah Rowe of Offender Management Unit (OMU) HMP Cardiff

SAMPLE OF FAILED DISCLOSURE AFTER TRIAL

  1. Refused the reason as to why, during 10th December13 Cardiff magistrates hearing and at its part heard deliberatively delayed Crown Court Appeal, relating to an arrest of a prison officer David Rogan, someone had ordered Governor Rowe to continue withholding my passport ever since my release last September. Since last August OMU has refused, until today, to respond to my numerous applications for reasons for withholding my passport/bail/HDC/  and way my category HIGH RISK/MAPP level 3 ever came about.
  1. Also why, recently, the phrase ‘sex offender’ has crept onto my PNC and other police documentation liable to go before any lay magistrate for bail consideration?
  1. Refused disclosure, today, of who continues to over rule His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC’s November 13 directions to HM No.1 Governor, Mr Steve Cross and why not allowing reasonable facilities, such as simple down loading a CD of urgent court data for posting.
  1. Is this HM Partnership at work again?
  1. Once printed copies have then been posted back, for signing, by helpers to a Claimant in already blocked civil proceedings, then and only then may there be the chance of them being posted, via prison and police censorship, to the respective courts all featuring in this brief ‘position statement’ re Article 6.
  1. Following a series of Cardiff Crown Court Judges reluctant to direct either GEOamey Custody Services or HMP Cardiff , as recorded on transcripts from the ‘Machine Gun’ Trial, ‘Harassment’ Trial, ‘Harassment’ Appeal, 1st  ‘Breach’ of Restraining Order Trial, the withdrawn 2nd ‘Breach’ of a Restraining Order Trial, Arrest of HM Prosecutor part heard Appeal, Arrest of a Prison Officer Trial, also part heard  and now 3rd ‘Breach’ of a Restraining Order Trial on appeal to the Criminal Court of Appeal, then just who is ultimately in charge of our law courts in The Principality seeking autonomy?

(This list is far from being exhaustive)

More drafted ‘grounds’ for bail & ‘leave to appeal’ as HMP conditions allow

BIAS

  1. Any white Caucasian born English and incarcerated in HMP Cardiff without any lawyer of the correct persuasion will face the inevitable ‘invincible prejudice’.
  1. Add this to the HM Prosecutor’s arrest and subsequent arrest of a prison officer, for deliberately withholding this Appellant’s passport for the Chief Constable, then there is bias with the very real risk of it being throughout the Welsh judiciary.
  1. I have been denied law books or even access to the prison library this year or even a fundamental clinical examination for reading glasses asked for since 16th October, last year.
  1. There continues to be non compliance of His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC’s directions in providing basic facilities for the prisoner to conduct his prosecution
  1. I can do nothing more, whilst in custody, in avoiding still further delays in lodging this appeal or expediting civil proceedings unless I am transferred outside the area as the HM Prosecution seem so easily to do when avoiding local publicity.

FAILED DISCLOSURE

  1. Disclosure now, of both transcript and clerk of the court’s notes of the original ‘harassment’ 2011 Cardiff magistrates hearing, comes far too late for either jury.
  1. Despite assurances from both HM Crown Prosecutor and His Honour Judge Andreae-Jones QC, in my 29th March 14 Bristol Crown Court appeal proceedings, A20140082(arrest of original prosecutor), I remain denied copies of relevant police, GEOamey Custodial Services, Crown Court, Magistrates records none of which being eligible for public interest immunity (PII).
  1. On the matter of outstanding court disclosure I continue to be denied copy, despite promises by various Cardiff courts, of the T20110090 4th May 12 jury trial and 1st December 2011 court exhibits confiscated, my sister was told, by the police when needed, this time round, for cross examination of the two key witnesses.
  1. I am, for example, promised Defence Exhibit, D2 (T20141144) clarification and for it to be ‘openly’ investigated by the Bristol HM Crown Prosecution Service.
  1. Should this random magistrate’s extract of public court record with other associated undisclosed court rulings on police records, all relating to the original seven harassment allegations, ever be disclosed then there will be no need for imprisonment or an appeal?
  1. Evidence yet to be rung out of the Bristol Crown Court Appeal A20140082 (Cardiff A20130139) hearing, the ‘private arrest of the original HM Prosecutor’ is deliberately being delayed for this London appeal, their usual tactics.
  1. It is not dissimilar to reasons why all previous court cases diverted to England were buried. I had received a suspect leg fracture, in 2010, from being pushed down the Cardiff Crown Court steps by an ex South Wales Police, Derrick Hasan, immune, by HM Partnership, to any risk of prosecution. That case was delayed for over two years to ensure its maximum effect in successfully opposing bail.

NHS (Wales) ZERO TOLERANCE POLICY (1CF03546)

  1. The next 2012 case, again on the same subject of fabricated NHS (Wales) patient records, included an already booked November jury trial for the alleged ‘2nd breach of the restraining order’. Similarly, it was delayed for as long as possible to ensure another protracted incarceration without the remotest chance, from the very start, of  the usual police MG 11 MG 6c & d etc audit trial being disclosed as the psychiatrist’s statement was again proved false but this time  for a very different reason entirely. None of the deposition papers were allowed by the last  trial judge despite written assurances to defence lawyers by the prosecution.
  1. Cardiff A20140005, the ‘arrest of a prison officer’, is also relevant for this appeal preparation and explains why, purely for HMP Cardiff staff protection, it is also adjourned without bail, the subject granted, in principle, in January and now tag eligibility both over ruled by dark forces.
  1. A familiar trick used this time, by switching the ‘also ran’ squatters’ jury trial (T20130801) without adequate notice, is an example to any still bemused website reader of tactics played to help lubricate ‘gravy train’ and  protect  state pensions.

DELAY

  1. Delay of ‘due process’ in these past five years was only to prejudice damages claims, BS614159, the ‘machine gun’ claim, NHS (Wales) claim 1CF03546 and many more currently stayed by the court. See enclosed 8th Oct 2008 letter below.
  1. This March jury, part way through the trial, was told to decide whether or not there ever had been a 1st December 2009 dated ‘Restraining Order’ and if so, was it served on me personally on 1st December 2011. Whether it was by Lee Barker of Geoamey Custodial Services while the clerk of the court, Michael Williams, was hiding in a cell near by for his own safety appeared not to be relevant.
  1. If it had not been for this good fortune for both prosecution and defence, by His Honour’s unusual ‘redirection’ of a jury as to what they were really there for, the prosecution barrister may never of achieved a conviction. It was inevitable, however, the difficulties this new evidence has caused, hidden since 1st December 20011, will now feature in cases to come, some not even on the charge book yet.
  1. Until His Honour’s interjection the defendant was heading for a likely acquittal due to apparent confusion and lack of real evidence for it to be safe to go before any jury. The defendant clearly now had a duty to give evidence and call witnesses if only to try and clarify the issue on the indictment despite opening up the only opportunity left to him to uncover the now compelling evidence proved to have been unlawfully withheld from the previous jury.

CONSPIRACY

  1. This conspiracy to ‘pervert the course of justice’ dates back long before the 2010 ‘machinegun’ trial when CPS (Cardiff) first abused the use of The Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 before both His Honour Judge Paul Thomas QC and  His Honour Judge Neil Bidder QC, anything to delay my release from gaol.
  1. 2009 courts had a written submission that I was medically unfit to cross examine either police or their own psychiatrist. This currently  adjourned Bristol appeal as His Honour Judge Andreae-Jones QC so succinctly put it in the dying seconds of the 29th March hearing, stated the promise of its disclosure rests with an ‘officer of the court’. Whether he meant in England or in Wales is of no surprise as his own Court Order, to disclose the usual list, is well past its ‘sale by date’.
  1. The manner in which this conspiracy was first concocted remains the ultimate responsibility of an external police force and senior police officers responsible for the painting of the ‘WW1 Lewis Machine Gun’ just a few months earlier. Despite having painted her a different colour, in an attempt to fool the jury, the latter, we are told, had already decided on the very first day of evidence.
  1. Until the IPCC or some law court eventually finds the moral fibre to intervene then the currently censored world wide publicity may no longer be guaranteed.
  1. The significant absence, since 2010, of any police records covering the alleged ‘harassment’ incidents, court and custody reports or CCTV coverage is of no surprise to this victim’s experience of South Wales Police’s continuing bullying.
  1. Not a jot, not even an iota of contemporaneous note of their victim’s unlawful detention, in Barry police station, on14th October 13 would the trial judge allow to be disclosed. My reporting of crime, affecting the suspended civil damages claim, should have been recorded again, twice in within a week!
  1. Why is the victim now onto his sixteenth judge, in this matter and one who also appears to be reluctant to comment on the merits of section 1(3) a), b) and/or c) of The Prevention of Harassment Act 1999, summarised as, ‘a course of conduct to detect or prevent crime’ being a possible defence.

MISDIRECTION OF JURY

  1. Imagine, please, the situation following the judge’s redirection of an already apparently bemused jury. At such short notice, therefore, I was now forced, despite facing particularly unfavourable custodial conditions, controlled entirely by the prosecution, to:

i). Change the cross examination requirements of each prosecution witnesses where not too late,

  1. ii)   give evidence myself but clearly restricted without  access to the considerable documentation and witnesses one always needs to corroborate such compelling evidence of such wide spread nefarious conduct,

iii) find from my ‘fish tank’, if allowed the spare nana second, any potential defence witnesses that just maybe within shouting distance through the crack in the glass. Out of sight due to the specially designed public gallery?

  1. The Defendant’s denied ‘opening speech’, ‘no case to answer’ or ‘abuse of process’ submissions, as to what this case was really all about, without proper court and police disclosure, suggests another jury trial to have my medical records corrected so I may, anywhere in the world, practice veterinary medicine or legally fly an aircraft.
  1. It is fact, not fiction, that the current part heard civil damages claim indicates well over 80% of all previous criminal allegations, brought by the South Wales, have eventually collapsed once there was proper disclosure of relevant facts.
  1. District Judge John Charles’ original 1st Dec 2011 Section 2(1) Prevention of Harassment Act 1997 conviction hearing recorded numerous disclosure application needed and applied for again for the subsequent 1st March 2012 appeal before His Honour Judge Hughes.

  1. All this was now again relevant as to whether the ‘Restraining Order’ had ever been served, the main reason behind Her Honour Judge Eleri Rees’ agreement, last September, that the case needed to be heard BEFORE this last jury trial.
  1. PACE 1984 and Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005 support both reasons  and the right to arrest, in these two particular cases, as David Gareth Evans was aware of the relevant facts he knowingly withheld from several courts.

CONFLICTING EVIDENCE

  1. Both magistrates’ clerk, a Mr Michael Williams and GEOamey Custodial Services manager, Lee Barker, gave conflicting evidence, not just at the 1st jury trial but again this 3rd one. The jury was again refused the CCTV footage, ‘vue de justice’ or even the plans of the custody suite lay-out to see the prosecution evidence was utterly ridiculous. The front page of the prisoner’s 1st Dec 2011 Personal Escort Record form (PER), alone, explaining why there could not of been any ‘licence’ in existence, to be signed by me, must have been be sufficient to explain why the police confiscated all court exhibits, mid trial, used for the previous jury.
  1. Why has the prosecution never questioned my evidence as to what actually occurred in the magistrates’ cells that day? Not only was it all witnessed by other identifiable GEOamey custody staff, at the time, it was also caught on CCTV, its very purpose for being in my segregated number 3 cell with a second camera right outside its door! Why is there no record of the ‘service’ of a court order from any one else or in either clerk of the court’s notes or in the PER, the latter recording instead, ‘refusing to sign licence’ that has now been proven to have never existed?
  1. Comparison between these key prosecution witnesses’ transcripts, with their conflicting evidence each time, is sufficient to warrant a police investigation.
  1. My numerous CPS requested sect 8 disclosure applications is a matter, mean time, for David Gareth Evans, the complainant, shortly to be heard in Bristol Crown Court unless if I am forced to withdraw my appeal.
  1. The 2nd jury trial, listed for a date in November 2012, was aborted once their chief forensic psychiatrist’s July 2012 police statement had been leaked to the media.
  1. 2012 Cardiff Magistrates ‘post conviction correspondence’ flurry,  between Cardiff Crown Court, police  and the same HM Prosecutor, the latter shortly to give evidence in Bristol, declared I was not allowed:
  1. a copy or sight of any original magistrates court records
  2. to ‘vary’ the terms of 1st Dec 2011 Restraining Order
  1. under YJCE Act, the right to cross examine in 1st March 12 Appeal
  2. any witness summonses issued in 1st March 12 Appeal hearing
  3. under YJCE Act, the right to cross examine in 3rd May 12 jury trial
  4. any witness summonses issued in 3rd May12 jury trial

FABRICATED MEDICAL EVIDENCE

  1. Witnesses refused included the doctors that had carried out my August 09 brain scans contradicting the police psychiatrist’s quite unqualified reports when police applied with them that I be incarcerated in Ashworth Hospital, indefinitely.
  1. Doctors’ evidence from The Princess of Wales Hospital opinion was further questioned by a leading Southampton University neuro-radiologist, concerning my August 2009 brain scans. This report remains buried by Cardiff Crown Court..
  1. 18th September 2009 similarly fabricated e-mail to Dr Ruth Bagshaw of Caswell Clinic by Professor Rodger Wood, of Swansea University, remains buried quoting  his ludicrous ‘clinical examination’ revealing my ‘significant and irreversible brain damage’, diagnosed by his colleague was, caused by:
  1. i)   my ditching aWW2 D-Day Piper Cub in the Caribbean
  2. ii)   after flying to Australia in the Cub without a map and

iii)   having been a ‘long time drinking partner of Oliver Reed Esq, actor.

  1. This Applicant therefore filed Judicial Review Applications with Administrative Court and Court of Appeal to commence another audit trail of intrigue and subterfuge simply in the pursuit for reasonable disclosure of public records.
  1. Fortunately this delay has at least caused disclosure, too late for trial, of the police psychiatrist’s July and August 12 witness statements, sufficient to having me gaoled again and with  a November trial listed for the 2nd proposed jury trail.
  1. It was not until the content of both his statements were passed to another was it officially accepted the psychiatrist’s evidence was again fabricated causing my eventual release but he only being suspended on full pay and eventually sacked.
  1. To avoid the police psychiatrist having ever to face cross examination for his continuing conduct he had been granted immunity to prosecution by the Crown Prosecution Service (Wales) supported by the General Medical Council influenced, it is believed, to current area NHS ‘zero tolerance’ and South Wales Police ‘shoot to kill’ policy problems in South Wales.
  1. The 1st December 2011 ‘court records’, as an example, included a ‘brown envelope’ of instructions to the District Judge sealed by His Honour Judge Llewellyn Jones QC even before this Applicant was allowed to give evidence, have  pen and paper in his ‘fish tank’ or even any of his legal papers.
  1. His Honour Judge Llewellyn Jones QC had earlier sectioned me, under section 35 of the 1983 Mental Health Act and had me transferred to South Wales Police’s Caswell Clinic, Bridgend, psychiatric hospital and the start of these five years of terror for both me and my family.
  1. The subsequent 2012 JRs, IPCC and GMC audit trails include Magistrates’ Anna Rudolph’s communications with secretary to His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC, current trial judge to the Applicant’s suspended civil damages claim against the police. She  appears to explain (e-mail July 2012), perhaps, why no ‘Restraining Order’ was ever served  in the Cardiff  Magistrates cells in the first place with her also not finding the hand written draft of it on court file.

PERSONAL ESCORT RECORDS NEW EVIDENCE

  1. This new evidence, including the original Personal Escort Record (PER) forms from HMP Cardiff, discloses not just why the final version of any ‘restraining order’ was never served in the court cell on 1stv December 2011 but also, from one of the deliberately undisclosed four pages, it clarifies why I has detained unlawfully in custody for several hours despite having been released by the court.
  1. It was not until a later, on 24th December, that may have been a version was pushed under my police cell door, in the small hours, after I had been, the day before, arrested for breaching it!
  1. Delay in lodging an Appeal Application has, at least, caused me to obtain 3rd May 2012 Mackenzie Friend’s witness statement (exhibit refused by trial judge) originally served on Professional Standards Department at South Wales Police HQ and the equally dubious organisation, the IPCC (Wales) based in Cardiff.
  1. This friend’s statement also records he witnessed the subsequent 1st March 2012 Crown Court Appeal, the police first telephoning me of the very existence of any court order around 12th December 2013 and was again in court, on the 3rd May 12, during my 1st jury trial, when both he and all the other defence witnesses were denied right to give relevant evidence. This witness heard David Gareth Evans, the HM prosecution barrister admit that he may have the part hand written draft that was briefly produced inside my cell by Lee Barker.
  1. Reasons for my current delay to your court are remarkably similar to those in my 3rd May 2012 1st ‘Breach of Restraining Order’ (T20120090) application but, this time, far worse.
  1. The Crown Prosecution Service, this time around, has cited my original ‘grounds of appeal’, before Lord Leveson et al (201203241D), in the March 2012 Appeal, by down loading them from the internet. The prosecution exhibit (Exhibit: Pros 3) contained my legal submissions to the 2013 Criminal Court of Appeal.
  1. For me to send again the completed NG form first to Cardiff Crown Court is, may I suggest, adding further insult to injury following the deliberate delays in the past over the July 2010 ‘Contempt of Court’ appeal originating from the fabricated ‘machine gun’ trial when the police had painted the antique a different colour just to try and fool the jury. On that occasion I was pushed down a flight of court stairs by a court official, an ex police officer called Derrick Hasan, whist I was on sticks, to sustain a broken leg!
  1. HM Court Service (Wales) has their very own special ‘agenda’, where I am concerned, as illustrated in the sequence of 2003 HM Treasury Solicitor letters between Cardiff Court Managers, Messrs Luigi Strinati and Neil Pring. My numerous files going missing, between Cardiff and Whitehall, in my currently adjourned BS614159 Kirk v South Wales Police damages claim, is only part of the conduct surrounding their failed ill informed attempt in having me registered as a ‘vexatious litigant’.

OCT 2008 DISCLOSURE APPLICATIONS TO CHIEF CONSTABLE

  1. My 8th October 2008 Disclosure Application Letter to the Chief Constable, simply asking for primary disclosure on over two hundred police incidents against me and the effect it caused is a key document to anyone still in doubt about the amount of tax payer’s money the police are prepared to spend just to safe guard their pensions.

NHS LEGAL SUBMISSIONS

  1. The NHS lawyer’s 13th December 12 Written Submissions, to both HM Crown Prosecution Service’s Mr Dicken and later to Cardiff Magistrates have now been disclosed. Secretly but successfully, private lawyers for both police and NHS blocked my several applications to vary the ‘Restraining Order’.  It further reveals the conspiracy surrounding a blackmailed forensic psychiatrist being used to falsify my forensic records for Ashworth psychiatric hospital, Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) and Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons (RCVS).
  1. For this Applicant to is  to Appeal now, ‘out of time’, if his original appeal letter to Crown Court is no longer accepted, despite being sent within 28 days, is disappointing in the light of all the current circumstances.
  1. My four year blocked NHS Damages Claim 1CF03546, including the police psychiatrist and Swansea University professor, continues to seriously prejudice all current criminal proceedings and explains just why it is stayed.
  1. The danger remains of the continuing damage these psychiatric reports for the rest of my life.
  1. Until the unqualified author of these erroneous psychiatric reports is finally challenged, on oath, explaining as to just how he came to write such lies, having been assured they were only for the court held in secret and without me, this litigation as at risk of becoming somewhat protracted.

GUILTY PLEA IGNORED

  1. Until such time as my several indications to offer a ‘guilty plea’ due to  my apparent misunderstanding of sect 1(3) a) b) c) of The Prevention of Harassment Act 1997 or my medical records are corrected or clarified then this war of attrition for the truth will not abate.

Abuse Use of Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999

  1. Sect 34, 35 and 36 were all successfully applied, under Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, on at least eight occasions, reliant on evidence in Bristol Crown Court shortly due to heard in Bristol Crown Court before His Honour Judge Andreae-Jones QC’s following his Court Order.
  1. On 14th Oct 13, shortly after 9am but before my arrest and caution in Barry police station, I was unlawfully detained for a period in the region of one hour.
  1. HM Crown Prosecutor, David Gareth Evans, was due to have his YJCE Act written legal submissions disclosed at Cardiff Crown Court at 10.30am that same morning. He was to argue as to why I was not fit to cross examine him in the forthcoming Bristol Crown Court appeal following his arrest concerning his conduct relating to both 1st Dec 11 ‘harassment’ conviction proceedings  and subsequent 4th May 2012 ‘breach of a restraining order’ conviction.
  1. David Evans was to apply for Cardiff Crown Court to appoint a lawyer on my behalf. Sections 37/38 were abused from the start and on numerous occasions concerning the conduct of appointed solicitors, all strangers each time to myself.
  1. David Evans and or court was aware or should have been of agreed cross examination questions between myself and court appointed solicitors before 2nd November 2010 and November/December 2011 hearings and the latter’s subsequent appeal on 1st March 2012 re harassment conviction.
  1. David Evans and or court was aware or should have been and failed to act as an ‘officer of the court’ following a Newport solicitor conducting no cross examination what so ever in a Cardiff magistrates’ micro seconds disposal of a ‘failure to attend/common assault allegation’ hearing and again when the Swansea solicitor failed to seek any section 8 or otherwise disclosure prior to the police psychiatrist giving evidence.
  1. Police psychiatrist’s 2009 MAPPA reports were written with neither appropriate qualifications nor concern for the obvious collateral damage they would cause.  ‘Possible cancer’ (see 2nd Dec 2009 transcript), referred to by the then HM Prosecution barrister, Richard Thomlow, further conflicts with  30th Aug 09 Princess of Wales Hospital brain scan and 1st December 09 Southampton University privately commissioned report indicating to the court appointed solicitor, Mr Vincent Williams
  1. Exactly the same situation was repeated at the 1st March 2012’s subsequent appeal by Vincent Williams again failing to challenge any of the erroneous medical evidence even before another CPS barrister ultimately responsible.
  1. YJCE Act 1999 has been regularly used by the CPS since my clandestine ‘machine gun’ MAPPA 2009 registration. During 25th January 2010 Cardiff Crown Court trial, re breach of sect 5 of the Fire Arms Act 1968, its purpose was to prevent my cross examination of the real ‘Foxy’ prosecution witness, a female police officer who had first spoken to myself on the telephone as an ‘agent provocateur’ while posing as a purchaser of prohibited weapons.
  1. The under cover police officer, purported to have been ‘Foxy’, gave evidence behind a screen declaring it was male.
  1. On the last day of trial, on 10th February 2010, with the main prosecution witness having been withheld for as long as possible the ‘officer in charge’(OIC) for the then Chief Constable, Barbara Wilding, instigator of the Metropolitan Police’s ‘shoot to kill’ policy in South Wales, was fortunately spared the critical cross examination for acquittal.
  1. Almost every one in the public gallery and those remaining in the prosecution witness waiting room knew the obvious awaited question following my refused application, at the commencement trial, when asking to inspect Exhibit One, the WW1 relic lying on the table directly in front of where the jury were to sit.
  1. My 8th Oct 2008 Disclosure Application letter to Barbara Wilding, following the most recent forty incidents  or so police bullying incidents, caused His Honour Judge Nicholas Chambers QC’s November 2008 Court Order that may have influenced her resignation letter. At the same time, I was referred to FTAC, interviewed but registered MAPPA level 3 without my knowledge until told after 17th Dec 09 Crown Court proceedings (see transcript). MAPPA records disclose the view of having me ‘lawfully’ shot.
  1. During HM Prosecutor’s apparent questioning to now introduce April 2013 ‘varied’ Court Order, to the original 1st December 2011 ‘Restraining Order’, I was unable to hear or comprehended owing to my being forced to conduct my defence from a ‘fish tank’ without adequate audio facilities. Likewise, any possible rebuttal by legal argument over the manner of ‘bad character’ introduction, by prosecution submissions or innuendo to affect the jury, also remains inadequate from ‘grounds of appeal’ for my failing to hear enough of what was said.
  1. I failed to hear more than 20% of most days proceedings due to the overriding physical impairment now confirmed by external medical attention denied me from the very first day of incarceration.
  1. Denied the right to:
  1. an ‘opening address’ for a case so unusual,
  2. a ‘no case to answer’ submission or
  3. an ‘abuse of process’ application left this hearing unsafe to have been put     before a jury unless, of course, the Defendant had been given proper disclosure of public records then no trial would have been required.
  1. David Gareth Evans, after the November11magistrates trial had already started, therefore interjected the additional ‘allegation’ of harassment (3rd on judge’s amended court list), a Royal Mail franked and posted ‘WANTED poster’ letter to the ‘complainant’ doctor. Their victim was denied sight of ‘envelope’. Owing to the deliberate variation of Wanted posters and to whom they were to affect David Gareth Evans, part way through summary proceedings also attempted to switch exhibits in number (4) of 10th Nov 11 district judge Charles countersigned amended charge.
  1. Number (4) on the list of allegations of ‘harassment’ was in relation to my 5th July 2012 visit to Cardiff Central Police Station with signed statements from a Lincoln shire Air Museum. Both pilots and registered CAA aircraft engineers had agreed with me that my once owned ‘WW1 Lewis machine gun was exempt of section 5 of 1968 Fire Arms Act, in any event. Also, she had been returned, after the jury trial, a different colour to when the South Wales Police first confiscated the aircraft component.
  1. Despite their victim obliged to withhold both these fundamental facts from any pre-trial proceedings, in the misconceived belief the police bulling would now stop, he was, in any event, acquitted with the usual ‘no costs’ awarded.
  1. HM Crown Prosecutors, in turn, withheld the fact that the ‘envelope’, in which the ‘WANTED’ poster was purportedly contained therein carried relevant evidence on its outside explaining why witness summonses, on behalf of myself, to clarify, were so ardently but successfully resisted before Their Honours Judge Hughes, John Curran QC, Neil bidder QC and most recent trial judge, Judge Rowlands QC.
  1. As with this earlier but similarly vital ‘interjection’ for a conviction, by being memorably recorded in the Glamorgan Gem, so the latest will be best remembered by look of astonishment, at the time, it had caused on the prosecutor’s face.
  1. So why did both NHS(Wales) and The Chief Constable need to employ just so many private solicitors and private barristers to sit in and witness all those subsequent criminal proceedings caused by such a fictitious allegation in an attempt to deflect public interest in incorrect medical records.
  1. Whereas evidence by the police psychiatrist, indicating that I should be transferred to a maximum security psychiatric prison, has never  ever been allowed to be challenged in court like wise, the Claimant, identified in the 8th October 2008 disclosure application letter to the Chief Constable, copied below, has also never been cross examined on his insistence that he never received, had sight of  or knowledge of its existence, on 1st December 2011, while unlawfully incarcerated in Cardiff magistrates cells despite having been released from any further custody by the court.

Barbara Wilding

The South Wales Police

Barry, Cowbridge, Fairwater, Cardiff Central, Rumney, Bridgend and Ely Police Stations

South Wales

8th Oct 2008

Discovery and Inspection of Documents

Dear Sir,

I require, at your earliest convenience, inspection of documents discoverable under the law, including general Orders and ancillary documents created by the south Wales Police following the 200 incidents/arrests cited in the 5 actions:

Kirk v South Wales Police Actions of Harassment

BS614159-MC65,

CF101741

CF204141

7CF07345

8F02269

Any delay may lead to an application to the court.

The first 3 Actions listed need only be dealt with first in time for next court date of 17th October 2008

Yours truly

Copy to John Smith MP

  1. Since The Claimant’s 8th October 2008 Disclosure Application Letter to The South Wales Police the Claimant has never been permitted access to:
  1. any Cardiff court building unless named as a ‘party’
  2. any Cardiff court public counter simply to expedite outstanding litigation
  3. listen to any court tapes either due to clear omissions or additions found on official court transcripts often destined for higher courts
  4. inspect court records and in particular, the record of his own files having been sent to HM Treasury Solicitor with the view of having him registered as a ‘Vexatious Litigant’
  5. inspect relevant police records created by incidents and in particular when used for prosecution purposes and not protected under Public Interest Immunity (PII), MAPPA or any other disclosure legislation.

This ‘Position Statement’ for numerous suspended cases, long outstanding applications for disclosure and permission to appeal to Criminal Court of Appeal has had to be re dated for weeks.

Until such time as this prison allocates staff to briefly supervise this letter with numerous others, having waited months, to be just downloaded onto one CD and posted I will remain unable to expedite, of course, this politically sensitive litigation.

No HMP laptop yet issued or photocopying and printing allowed, even at my expense.

Yours truly,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Copies to:

His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC                     BS61415+    Cardiff County Court

His Honour Judge Andreae-Jones QC                      A20140082    Bristol Crown Court

His Honour Judge Crowther QC                              A20140005    Cardiff Crown Court

Alun Cairns MP

CCRC

RCVS

CAA

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Act V Scene 2 Enter Centre Stage the Very Venerable Professor Rodger Wood of Swansea University

http://www.swansea.ac.uk/staff/human-and-health-sciences/psychology/r.l.wood/#publications=is-collapsed

Dear Dr Tegwyn Williams,

Aren’t you lucky to be allowed to continue to practice after what you did to me.  Only in Wales would you have ‘got away with your conduct’ as you very well knew at the time.

Do you remember what first started our ‘relationship’?  This Dolmans fabricated affidavit for the Chief Constable only to sign and only signed at all six weeks late after His Honour Judge Nicholas Chambers QC’s ordered dead line as I kept having to visit the solicitor’s offices and thump their reception table with my fist until it was done or I would be staying for the night.

Wilding Affidavit 25 02 2009

Abuse of Process Summary Page 2 Jan 2009

 

Now you know as I know and all hard working staff of Caswell still know, after my ridiculous meeting with this self-centred  individual, Wood,  full of his own importance, that he is the proverbial real ‘nigger in the wood-pile’ in all this,  isn’t he, who criminally caused you, for his ‘famous for fifteen seconds’ routine, to write that final report all Cardiff judges, in turn, have been determined to hush-up ever since?

Remember, now Mr Justice Nicholas Cooke QC, as The Recorder of Cardiff, after the ‘machine -gun ‘ trial collapse had promised me those medical records of yours but was clearly lying with the rest of them, as now PROVED for fear of his pending promotion to the Royal Courts of Justice.

The expressions on the face of your  Head of Caswell Clinic’s forensic psychology unit said it all, that day, as she suffered while the idiot ‘waxed eloquent’ on how I must be clinically mad for having flown to Australia at my age and all alone, the dammed fool.

Do you remember,  Tegwyn, your truly competent in-house psychologist you had designated to me in order to assess my IQ and other things requiring those apparently crazy tests I dabbled with just out of reference to his specialist profession? He did leave  me wondering, however,  whether he was, while on the job, a ‘secret drinker’ when your equally concerned in-house GP then revealed his report of me while assessing my overall well-being in that frightening prison of yours.

Oh yes, my wife and very young daughter dutifully brought in my food and water each day as soon as I realised that any ingestion of medication during the three months meant my being further sectioned for an indefinite period.

He showed me Wood’s stupid September 2009 account of me recounting our meeting that was later emailed to Ruth Fanshaw for your hospital prison records.

Those records were then promptly seized by the South Wales Police for now Cardiff judge Richard Thomlow, as  Crown Prosecutor to stop the fast arriving Barbara Wilding cooked-up machine gun trial before the equally wicked Judge Paul Thomas QC who knew from the very start by the way the ‘gun’ was brought in and out of court slung over an unarmed copper’s shoulder!

Remember Judge Thomas, Tegwyn, that similar piece of detritus as Rodger Wood, refused an investigation, asked for by the rest of the jury, of the police-plant amongst them  hell-bent on dissuading the rest to adduce their ‘not guilty’ verdict decided by the end of the very first day of ridiculous police  evidence. That recounting by nine of the jury in that pub, immediately after my acquittal is an indictment, alone, of the pure evil in your law courts.

Remember his equally corrupt mate, Judge John Curran QC (Quaintly Corrupted) and Judge Hughes refused you or your wife the opportunity , as my own defence witnesses, to correct my medical records without the need for saying why it was done.

You also knew, during the 1st March 2012 harassment appeal farce,  that the 4th May 2012 Cardiff Crown Court trial, to come, would prove ‘breach of a restraining order’ was impossible as no such order was ever served on me in the first place!

Your London lawyer is to be summoned on the matter at my next hearing

My wanting you as a defence witness had, of course, triggered  the attentive  jury to write that fateful jury -note wishing for sight of court and custody records of the magistrates cell activity by Geoamey Custodial Services.

The CCRC now admit, only last month, that each version of the 1st December 2011 magistrates court file ordered to be released, on my equally farcical  ‘harassment ‘ conviction, is completely different each time and still devoid of my defence argument that, in the rule of law, no one should be prosecuted when detecting or preventing crime.

That has now been shown to have been the truth with you being first blackmailed to write it, my never seeing the Judge Bidder QC/CPS port folio and now your unfairly being sacked and paid off to ‘get out of the kitchen’.

Judge Rowland quashing any such restraining order after the 3rd Restraining Order jury trial was to protect the original Judge John Charles repeatedly refusing me, ever since, to have access to a court to amend any purported court order in light of your new evidence.

Judge Paul Thomas made damned sure neither  I nor Lord Justice Leveson et al, at my 2013 Criminal Court of appeal, were to know about its content either or see the jury’s revealing note to Curran in my absence for urgent medical attention.

Even the Sun newspaper’s vivid pictures and article recorded the extreme lengths to which I had to stoop when trying to get vital defence papers out of my prison cell or into court purely to be put before the jury.

 

12 05 04 Judge Ignored  Jury Note

A right bunch of shysters you mixed up with in Cardiff’s thoroughly corrupt judiciary did you not and could Enid Blyton have written it better, I often say?

You must be so relaxed now amongst a nation famous for what the occupants did for King and Country in the past two World Wars loosing more per capita of population than any other country fighting the tyranny of the Hun.

After countless attempts under FOI etc etc, following my acquittal and nearly eight  more months of my life suffering the stench of a Welsh prison,  I obtained what police allowed to be released to me by NHS (Wales) as my ‘medical records created  whilst in custody’.

BUT their reliant Professor Wood ‘input’, to prevent the embarrassment of the already doomed machine -gun conspiracy going public, by having me incarcerated in Ashworth High Security Psychiatric hospital instead, had been systematically redacted.

Instead of the Rodger Wood email to Ruth Bagshaw, shown to me in the September Caswell psychiatric assessment when no less than fourteen doctors were consulted to support you both, bugger the expense, his April 2012 version had the following removed:

Wood had relied on his ‘findings’ of ‘irreversible brain damage’ based on his unqualified view of your arranged ‘brain- scans’ at the Princess of Wales Hospital , Bridgend using, it now appears,  with both the wrong soft-ware and wrong X-Ray machine.

09 08 28 SPECT & MRI Scans

09 0 08 EP leaked Doc

?

13 09 14 Bright TMW solicitor

14 09 27 P10 A20140082 dastardly devious deceit

Wood, the prime prat, wrote that from his ‘vast experience’ as an amateur week -end pilot with his gin-drinking set, he had to find some way of spending his ill-gotten gains at the tax payer’s expense,  ruled that my brain damage was ‘irreversible’ to warrant my needing to be registered MAPPA category 3 level3 for instant removal from the community and even Cardiff prison to high security Ashworth or Broadmoor, for an indefinite period, because in his opinion not yours:

  1. Kirk had crashed his cub in the Caribbean
  2. flown all the way to Australia without a map and
  3. had been a long-term drinking partner of the actor, Mr Oliver Reed!

 

It is long over due for the tax payer, Tegwyn, for your London based Ewan Bright, solicitor, and myself to have that constructive meeting as to letting you back in and to blazes with the culprits they are all immune to prosecution under our antiquated HM Partnership convenient arrangement.

Remember, your solicitor had pleaded 0n your behalf for nearly an hour, in October 2013, while Barry police had me goaled without arrest nor caution, a habit of theirs, not to allow yet another jury chance to see the faked Professor Wood documents.

Remember , you were there as I had been refused attendance at my own hearing for a life sentence.

I am expected to believe that was the first time before His Honour Judge Neil Bidder QC, on 2nd December 2009, to try and get me silenced for good.

So what did your solicitor achieve to have my name then expunged from the MAPPA registry following His Honour’s next public discussion on 17th December?

Now with Judge Bidder in possession of not just Ashworth’s psychiatric report only achieved by Doctor Silver keeping his foot jammed in the crack of my cell door for 40 odd minutes but also having my equally damming specialist English brain damage specialist report acquired by Nuala wife, consultant radiologist, of my dear old friend, Walter Sweeny, Vale of Glamorgan’s recent MP who had opened my one of only four, in those days, in Wales, Barry Veterinary Hospital.

Never fear, Tegwyn, His Honour Judge Seys Llewlyn QC is charged  by HM Partnership and has taken the reins of the ‘runaway horse’, with his blocking my civil damages claim some six years now, in preventing the Welsh public ever knowing  as to just which victim amongst them will be next to be dealt with your ‘Gulag card’ without need of a trial with still more embarrassing public records to bury.

His Honour Judge Seys Llewelyn  bluntly refused, remember, release of my 2009 MAPPA records, from the T+-`affia hierarchy, all either concocted in Barry police station or at HQ while Barbara was, herself, rumour has it, was frantically painting my once owned 1916 replica DH2’s decommissioned  WW1 Lewis machine-gun yet another different colour to try and fool the jury.

Incidentally, some police man had the task , after my acquittal,  to paint her back to grey again as the Yorkshire Musieum had painted her not the black as at Farnborough and following prop breaking off mid channel. Barbara was using black paint to match my  video on You Tube about the very first thing the jury was expected at the opening of the prosecution’s case.

The jury was then expected to be fooled  by ‘foxy’ a police man behind the witness box screen pretending to be the police woman trying to  buy her off my then wife about a year earlier over the telephone!

09 12 02 Crown BidderTranscript

the next picture is the near 2000 mile route around the UK  with Welsh police, often entirely alone contrary to common sense and regulations IF it really was a ‘prohibitive weapon’, hawking the ‘gun’ around desperate to bribe someone to tell the jury it was a prohibitive weapon!

The first comment I overheard from nine of the jury in the pub afterwards was:

“Why was the buyer  not in the dock along side Mr Kirk? This prompted me, taking no part in the hilarious conversations, to ask my nephew to ask them at the bar why was it then ‘the seller’, also a prosecution witness, not also had been on remand in Cardiff prison for nearly eight months?

(To much of that to be revealed right now)

2000 miles to fudge the issue of a REPLICA machine gun

2000 miles to fudge the issue of a REPLICA machine gun

Our Genevieve drew this while waiting for the crooked Welsh lawyer, lost without trace,  who took my £4,500 cheque for the transcript before it was snatched by the Welsh police , as they do with court exhibits when needed for appeals outside Wales.

Oh, I almost forgot, a quote from the Professor’s induced DR TW’s ‘expert’ report that almost caused HHJ Neil Bidder QC to have me locked away for life, without even a public trial……Now, can you lot not see we are far, far too late for Brexit dreams?

 

In the Cardiff County Court                                              Case nos. BS614159-MC65; CF101741;CF204141;7CF07345 etc

Maurice Kirk v Chief Constable of South Wales Police

Further to Judge’s Order for Claimant’s Submissions to be served on the Defendant          by 2pm 19th August 2016

                                                                                       and

Pursuant to Judge’s note of 8th August 2016 re Para 8 judge’s note 7CF07345, actions to be heard in strict order, it is humbly contested by the Claimant as being ‘an abuse of process’ as the 1CF03361 machine-gun case, already deliberately delayed by the Welsh authorities for over, not six but seven years, was a blatant criminal act condoned by too many Cardiff judges to number, countless CPS lawyers and senior South Wales Police officers only concerned for their pensions.

  • To date, my rulings have been that the various actions which were stayed pending trial of the First to Third Actions should be dealt with in sequence according to the dates of subject matter. On 8 August 2016 I expressly reserved and refrained from adjudicating on any issue which might arise as to whether permission should be granted to include in 7CF07345 issues or complaints arising only later in date, or already pleaded in a separate action.

The repeated refusal of both Cardiff criminal and civil courts to disclose public paid court records, just because they do not stand up to scrutiny, is a further ‘abuse of process’ with the Claimant humbly submitting is such deliberate conduct to frustrate a litigant, seeking both punitive damages and exemplary damages, as stated at the time of each unlawful arrest

(Ref: Ongoing Criminal Cases Review Commission ongoing investigation re claimant’s Dr Tegwyn Williams 1st Dec 2011 Cardiff Magistrates harassment conviction and appeal court records of same now seized and altered by the South Wales Police)

The matters in first four Actions were aggravated by the conduct of the police above the ordinary as indicated in the fact of the unusual, extreme and unusual bullying of the Claimant when, from over one hundred police criminal allegations made within the first three of ten actions, well over 80% were quashed by common sense prevailing in subsequent courts, police stations or CPS offices now requiring a higher court’s immediate intervention if not by another police force.

The Claimant also claims exemplary damages as the conduct of the police was arbitrary, oppressive and unconstitutional again cited within the facts and those court records yet to be disclosed by a higher court.

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

25th August 2016

 

A SUMMARY OF STATE OF PLAY as of 8am  Friday 26th August 2016

Claimant Position Statement
1. The Claimant has failed to locate any evidence of a ‘sealed’ judgment of 26th October2015, for the first three actions or one purported to have been sent to him on the 26th October 2015 by email as stated in conversation with court clerk.
2, Repeated requests for copy of same have not been successful as with release of purported court copy of police corrected version returned before judgment handed down
3. Two visits and the last by post to RCJ Court of Appeal office, to tender an appeal with a printed ‘judgment’ and fee, has been refused, each time, as not sealed.
4.  The Claimant continues to be refused sight of the court log or obtain copy of it
5. The Claimant continues to have identified some of his considerable number of prosecution exhibits served on both Defendant and court.
6. 1st Action para 8.6,the Grand Avenue Ely ‘garrotte’ incident , in which a dozen breaches in PACE 1984 were committed, with his preliminary appeal submission  focused on that incident, from thirty three similar. so far cited of incessant police bullying, there now appears irregularity jeopardising the Claimant;s right to appeal
7.1st Action  para 8. Claimant’s copy of his police interview without even a caution, when police switched to the indictable allegation as he was ‘identifiable’, has been seized by the court and refused it be investigated by an outside police force.
8. 7CF07345 2916 amended particulars of claim, served on the court by another, is being withheld from the claimant despite requests from both donor and court to release.
9. The 7CF07345 October 2007 Claimant’s Particulars of Claim contained numerous  police incidents that required the nefarious assistance of a few Cardiff court staff and CPS (Wales) lawyers to obtain those key criminal convictions, within the first four of some ten Actions time period, to cause the Claimant’s name from being removed from the veterinary register.
10, Neither the donor nor the court will furnish the Claimant with a copy of that purported 8th august 2016 varied submission, referred to in para 4 of His Honour’s August 2016 note.
11. The Claimant is therefore unable to include into the amended particulars, already with the court, those specific incidents identifying Cardiff ‘court officers’ repeatedly being omitted by any fellow Cardiff ‘court officer’ approached for the task, during this last decade, for fear of his or her job and rightly so.
12. Hence the need for more and more litigants in person, so often against their wishes, hampering the running of our completely outdated British law courts driven by avarice.
13. Therefore a further seven days is needed for this Claimant to draft the amended version so granted by the honourable court.
13. Incidents excluded by Claimant’s proposed representatives include:
I) Court official, ex police officer, causing a suspect fracture of the Claimant’s leg when pushed down the court steps whilst on his crutches because he was seeking public records
ii) Court official, CPS prosecutor Jackie Seal, aware but misleading the Barry lay magistrates that the three versions of Claimant’s alleged ‘Breach of the Peace’. incident, at the Vale of Glamorgan Show, drafted under the control of then Barry custody sergeant, Andrew Rice, while refusing the Claimant bail, then had switched the allegation to one of ‘common assault.
The BOP allegation, was only dropped for fear the claimant may go to prison (see court records on Claimant’s old web site) All this conduct was opposed by the CPS barrister, Ieun Rees, when made  aware of the full facts but told to ‘shut up’.
11)Jackie Seal, when fully  aware that retired police inspector Howard Davies, had ‘struck the first blow at the Show and again had attacked the Claimant, with force, in the police witness room in Cardiff Crown Court before numerous uniformed police officers, then went into the witness box before HHJ Nicholas Gaskill QC and despite his rebuke at her  refused to clarify the mistakes of the lower court and wicked conduct of then Sergeant Andrew Rice who has so heavily featured in all four Actions.
12) The Claimant has record that Ms Seal and many other Cardiff Court officials later, all immune to criminal proceedings by HM Partnership, then went on and committed perjury over the incident leading to the Claimant having his name removed from the veterinary register
13) Over the past twenty three years of this Claimant requesting both relevant public court and police records, of relevant data to allow both a fair trial and have his name restored to the veterinary register, he has been refused.
Maurice J Kirk BVSc
Tel 07708586202                   
                              
Reply
Reply to all
Forward
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Police Failed Disclosure Proven at Last

????

16 04 11 dolmans garrotte tape disclosed

Adrian Oliver Dolmans

During the 2013 civil trial of evidence from 99 witnesses the trial judge had denied the Claimant the right to call key police officers featuring within their 24 years of a well orchestrated conspiracy to withhold facts that would have, over wise, have proved my innocence and therefore preventing my name from being removed from the veterinary register on issues that had nothing what ever to do with the welfare of animals.


16 04 12 tape 1

For the need for His Honour Judge Chambers QC, in late 2008, having to issue yet another futile court order on Barbara Wilding, the then Chief Constable, despite her having to personally swear an affidavit was like treating me as some cretin who still believed the rule of law prevailed in Wales.

This embarrassing criminal act of falsification caused her to dream-up the ‘machine-gun’ conspiracy and ‘shoot to kill’ idea but only  by using private solicitors, Dolmans, in also conspiring in having their victim and ‘gravy train’ first charged with ‘being in possession of a WW1 Lewis machine-gun’, for the mandatory 10 year prison term but actually concocting a scheme to frustrate their victim even getting a fair civil yet alone a criminal trial.

[Just how many more crooked Cardiff court judges, I ask the UK tax payer, is it going to take when still all reliant on their very own police having to continue blackmailing the now sacked Wales Chief Forensic Psychiatrist, Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams, to uphold his original  psychiatric reports purely to block the ‘machine-gun’ trial?]

Even Judge Seys Llewelyn QC has indicated that neither Dr Tegwyn Williams  nor the real rogue behind this continuing persecution of their victim, Professor Rodger Wood of Swansea University, examined their patient for  the Cardiff Crown Court or had  the qualifications.

As a Barry police station registered MAPPA category 3 level 3 individual,  roaming our streets as an extreme danger to our community, was not a trite irresponsible of the police in not  telling their victim had a suspect brain tumour before having him shot?

Asylum Seeker from Persicution

Contrary to what the CPS say and hence CPS barrister David Gareth Evans’ arrest, no ‘restraining order’ was ever served on Maurice Kirk  on 1st December 2011 in the cells of Cardiff magistrates courts. Only in a Cardiff court could such a simple fact be hushed-up.

In their pathetic attempt in covering up the truth in that in law it cannot be an act of harassment if crime is being further detected. Subsequent juries, in turn, have all been denied countless court, police and Geoamey Custodial Services records of those facts.

Then, suddenly this year, one of the many purported Claimant interview tapes, obtained from their victim back in 1993, is mysteriously ‘disclosed’ despite the trial judge having already denied the relevant key police witnesses giving evidence.

Key witnesses included:

  1. Ex Sergeant Hill who confiscated the CPS file, in open court, at the collapse of the Anti-Terrorism/smuggling pigs into Eire Barry magistrates case.
  2. Inspector Andrew Rice Featuring so heavily in having my name removed from the veterinary register and unable to legally fly
????

????

3. CPS prosecutor Stan Sofa following his arrest after 24/7 surveillance was again proved in any attempt to prevent this veterinary surgeon his right to practice veterinary surgery.

4. Barbara Wilding

. Rtd Inspector Trigg who had aided with many others to withhold the identity of their victim to Cardiff magistrates as they waited for his extradition to Guernsey, of all places despite  his own clients complaining of their veterinary surgeon being assaulted

6. Ex Sergeant Rundles who had witnessed evidence of countless burglaries of their victims veterinary surgeries only to tell the jury, to have him struck off, they had all been simply ‘criminal damage’ to massage t he police current appalling police statistics

7. Cardiff Air Traffic Controller, Johnathan Clayton, who had slipped their was a police video tape in existence of the extremely dangerous police helicopter ‘beat -up’ fo their victim’s aircraft contrary to Air Navigation Order law that had to be completely hushed up with the aid of the Civil Aviation Authority

93 05 20 Interview Tape.jpg

wanted-poster.jpg

16 04 19 BS Tape judgment

Hill afidavit exhibits

It is of interest to note and curious to some that still the Cardiff courts refuse to consider my  applications to vary a purported but never served restraining order which , in itself , appears unlawful.

But who cares in South Wales as with brexit promised they get a step closer to their own judiciary and police force neither answerable to either London or the European courts.

Now, with HMCS (Wales) altering and also destroying  the sensitive parts of the original court records of the harassment trial,  ending on 1st December 2011 but tape recorded throughout, what will the taffia dream up next with Dr Tegwyn Williams sacked and deported to New Zealand  for his conduct when those in the know it was never his fault in the first place!

Interesting in that the CCRC now admit that when it acquired that original court file for me, in early 2012, it was completely different in content but when asking for it again, as the 4th May 2012 jury had asked for it.

16 07 20 CCRC Damning Admissions

‘Little new under the sun’ in this little lot

The police had seized the prosecution exhibits used in the subsequent appeal, my sister and others were told, during the 3rd ‘breach of a restraining order’ trial.

On the 1st March 2012 before HHJ Hughes is where it should of been sorted but he was of a funny hand shake brigade that has, alas, the welsh community in a strangle-hold reminding me so much of my days in Guernsey having fled Taunton’s ‘curly’ Hawkins persecution informing others, in writing,  ‘the prisoner is most dangerous and likely to try and escape’.

Taunton, where I was happiest and where Uncle Maurice worked with Dad as veterinary surgeons.

And was all worth fighting for?

Uncle Maurice Lille Northern France

 

45 03  03 Lille Northern France

 

to be continued……..

 

South Wales Police greed

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Alun Michael Police Commissioner for South Wales Police responds

 

Dear Mr Kirk,

The law states that the Police and Crime Commissioner for South Wales is the “Appropriate Authority” to deal with complaints about the personal conduct of the Chief Constable of South Wales Police.  You contacted the Independent Police Complaints Commission with a complaint and the Commission has passed your complaint on to me for attention.

I understand that you are making complaints about both the previous Chief Constable, Barbara Wilding, and the current Chief Constable, Peter Vaughan. Unfortunately , the IPCC have made an error in copying your complaint and some pages are missing- these are pages 9,10 and 11 of the paperwork you provided to Chris McCoy at the IPCC during your meeting. I would be grateful if you could provide me with a copy of those pages.

Your complaints against Barbara Wilding will not be recorded because they are a repetition of complaints which were made some years ago and were dealt with by the then South Wales Police Authority. That matter is therefore closed and I cannot consider or take any further action in respect of those complaints.

You set out your complaint against Peter Vaughan is as follows: “The current Chief Constable has caused the sudden release of a purported true copy of my interview tape taken while I was in custody in Fairwater Police Station, Cardiff”.

In order to give proper and objective consideration to your complaint I need to make sure that I understand it.  I am therefore writing to you to seek clarification in respect of this aspect of your complaint.  Please can you answer the following three questions :

  • Please explain what evidence there is to show that the Chief Constable personally committed the action you allege?
  • Please will you provide me with that evidence ?
  • Please can you explain what has caused you to think that the Chief Constable released your interview tape?

I would be grateful for any further information and/or evidence you can provide in respect of this complaint.  Any information you provide will be carefully considered and I will give you a response as soon as possible.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Yours,

Alun Michael

From …………….

Rt. Hon. Alun Michael

Labour and Co-operative

The Police & Crime Commissioner for South Wales

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment