D-Day for Wales’ Dream for Judicial Autonomy ?

Following the Avon and Somerset Constabulary having received a detailed complaint on how the Chief Constable of South Wales Constabulary launched her police helicopter, stuffed with her police officers and armed with a camera, just to chase my cub within 50 ft of her tail feathers, now the Criminal Cases Review Commission is to investigate the whole of Cardiff’s judicial set-up when appearing to be so riddled with corruption.

16 06 06 Trinity Mags Disclosure

Cardiff Air Traffic’s Johnathan Clayton is currently protected by armed Cardiff airport police to try and  prevent me, again, from serving a witness summons on him.

Mr Clayton will testify the police video was taken so close to my cub that all can read ‘I’d rather be flying G-KIRK’ printed on my T-Shirt!

The beaches of  Arr0manches appear to being invaded once more, some seventy one years on,with my D-Day cub, again, buzzing along behind!

Route of the low level ‘hairy’ low level chase, an act highly appropriate for several indictable offences.

HELICOPTER CHASE MAP 3

99 07 04 Helicopter chase COMPLAINT

16 06 06 brief for Welsh Minister

My MP’s initial response:

Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
alun.cairns.mp@parliament.uk
Technical details of permanent failure:
553-Sorry, your email address maurice@kirkflyingvet.com has
553-been blacklisted. Refer to the Troubleshooting page at
553-http://www.symanteccloud.com/troubleshooting for more

The police helicopter, incidentally, later crashed owing to too poor maintainence from to many unnecessary flights such as chasing kites over 5 Mile lane, Barry and bullying Maurice Kirk just to film him when, apparently, flying without a pilot’s licence!

99 07 04 Heli Danger013 (2)_1112313_copter300heli crash

 

http://kirkflyingvet.com/photos/maurices_picks/CAA-Apeal-Taunton.aspx

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Alun Cairns Secretary of State for Wales

Secretary of State for Wales
The Welsh Government
Cathays Park
Cardiff
CF10 3NQ

30th May 2016

Dear Mr Cairns,

South Wales Police Admit Negligence

‘What really goes on in our Law Courts’

‘Only last week, Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, recalled that “the principle of open justice is fundamental to the rule of law and to democratic accountability”. (BBC)

16 02 04 RCJ note take Judgment

This was stated following the findings of Burnett LJ and Mr Justice Sweeney in my favour regarding my ex-wife, Janet, on the first occasion and then again by a concerned McKenzie Friend also being prevented from taking notes by yet another Cardiff judge denying me both the right to have my reading glasses or legal papers in court as a Litigant in Person (LiP).

‘What really goes on in our Prisons?

ClaimFormPt7CountyCt Min Justic

HMP Swansea then prevented my attending the follow-up hearing, to quash the original conviction following the arrest of a prison officer, for withholding my passport for the police, by stating on the telephone I had ‘refused to get on the prison van’. I have also been stopped five times, from attending, from HMP Cardiff and more than once from HMP Bristol.

Visiting Mr Justice Gilbart accepted their fairy tale despite my sister informing the court that the prison staff had already been caught on CCTV wheeling me off the van, in my wheel chair, after receiving radioed instructions that I also clearly heard despite my ailments.

‘What really goes on in our Cardiff Police Stations?’

(16 05 23 Cairns MP letter PACE breaches)

Your Cardiff County Court has accepted police documentation that originally went before Magistrates courts stating I could not be ‘identified’ despite a warrant for my arrest being in their possession from another force and my frustrated veterinary clients uttering the obvious.

I was held in Cardiff prison for three more days until being ‘identified’ by the Royal College of Veterinary College despite still being remanded there by your law court as ‘unidentified’.

A succession of police maintain I had ‘no address’ upon which to serve a motoring summons by successfully failing to disclose what the purported summons might have been for!

No consideration of evidence but IRIS records is needed for someone ultimately responsible, such as yourself, despite two deliberate omissions from the Human Rights Act 1998.

Your police have finally disclosed, after 23 years, my ordered tape copy of my interview taken under both incomplete & defective caution, only for your court to, again, confiscate it.

Machine-Gun/FTAC/MAPPA 3/3 NHS(Wales) Conspiracy

(machine gun summary)

Delay has been by a decommissioned ‘machine -gun’ having been painted a different colour by your police in an attempt to fool a jury only then needing to have it painted back to the air museum’s original colour upon my inevitable acquittal when facing 15 year’s incarceration.

This judge appears to have blocked this claim for 6 years, to prevent ‘consolidation’, despite my again seeking remedy for yet another malicious prosecution when all is needed is IRIS disclosure to inform other courts, well outside Wales, of this such apparent inherent deceit.

On your police statements alone, time and again, senior officers of the South Wales Police deny court cases even occurred despite this judge having been served authentic Barry Magistrates Court records from the heart of my veterinary practice and your constituency.

 

Dangerous Police Helicopter Chase 

HELICOPTER CHASE MAP3

The police helicopter finally crashed (see photos) due to fraudulent maintenance, again, under the control of Barbara Wilding, the then Chief Constable

16 05 31 Claimants ps BS 614159

FALSIFIED POLICE EVIDENCE-CONCEALING THE COMMISSION OF NUMEROUS INDICTABLE OFFENCES-to be published before 8th June Cardiff County Court hearing

[DETAILED ANALYSIS OF POLICE COVER-UP OF ITS OWN PACE & AIR NAVIGATION ORDER CAP 612 (Rules of Interception)].

An informed private pilot has just analysed the police witness statements that were before the judge written by numerous of your police officers operating the area police helicopter.

It is clear in his analysis (enclosed) the Cardiff court accepted multiple but falsified police written evidence yet clearly drafted by a ‘common author’, thus being prima facie evidence of dishonesty. Chief Constable Barbara Wilding and others swore on oath their statements were true and then promptly retired on full benefits.

The judge has dismissed all 33 of my near 100 police incidents, waiting, as ‘without merit’ and refused me even application to appeal to any higher UK court on my argument of an ‘overarching vendetta’ due to just so many ‘wins’ even in the Welsh courts.

South Wales Police Confess to Negligence

SWP Closing Submissions heli

 

As you are also my Member of Parliament and therefore have already received much detail of this complaint is it not time to reinstate Articles 1 and 13 within our own set of rules, for

the man on the street to understand or are we doomed for the alternative, judicial autonomy and Wales with its very own independent police force?

Yours sincerely,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

23 year old Police Custody Tape ‘found’

Arrested for four days in Cardiff Prison, as unidentifiable, whilst South Wales Police lean on guernsey police to have me extradited for failing to pay a parking fine or something similar…..

So, why did the police chose to release this one and not the other 20 odd?

Now  Cardiff civil judge hands down an unusual May 2016 order or is it that unusual, these days, with a London Mayor’s shiria law just around the corner to take its place?

16 05 10 Appeal order in terms

So Maurice seeks help from any lawyer in the UK:

On 16th of May 2016 Help4LiPs will be taking part in the London Legal Walk for the 4th year running with its co-founder, volunteers, and Ann John OBE, who has accepted the position of H4L spokesperson. As Lord Neuberger puts it, it is important for us to do the walk, but probably more important to raise money for the legal charities. Help4LiPs continues to build bridges and needs your help to raise funding.

H4L builds bridges between:

  • those that know the Law and those that need to know the Law;
  • “legalese” and everyday language;
  • the legal establishment and litigants in person;
  • Process and Justice.

Please click on the picture below to read more and help us help others who are forced to go to Law by clicking the donation below.

Maurice’s initial brief for help:

16 05 11 brief

2nd brief

His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC’s 6th May 2016 Judgment

  1. Priority need for legal representation as it is clearly a politically designed ‘hatchet job’ to cover up the current track record of both Welsh police and parts of its incestuous judiciary when both seeking autonomy at the expense of both their unsuspecting indigenous population and bemused English tax payer?
  1. The facts do not remotely relate to the evidence that was allowed in court.
  1. The law abuse by police, re failed disclosure, ridicules the ‘rule of law’ and a clear cover-up to protect those privileged in this parocial welsh judicial system.
  1. Who, then, has read my incessant police harassment history and not said is obvious there is still a campaign to ‘snuff me out’ from well over 20 years ago?
  1. Still no ‘machine-gun’ retribution allowed in the civil courts even after 6 years!!!
  1. Still no medical record correction despite yet another week- end, not in London, France or Texas, this time but in Ireland of more detention, havoc and misery as if I am a ‘mad man on the loose’. All, again, dependent upon fabricated South Wales Police MAPPA level 3 category 3 records (see websites).
  1. Still blocked in getting to court against the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) due to an apparent cover-up over the proven Welsh Authority’s fairy tale ‘Restraining Order’ breaches conspiracy, to delay this 23 year running civil claim, by my further incarceration in a prison to assist the Chief Constable.
  1. And yet Dr Tegwyn Williams /Professor Wood’s unqualified medical reports were laughed out of court by His Honour Judge Bidder QC, in Dec 09, when he ordered I stand trial, as a litigant in person, to face the mandatory 15year prison sentence, intended, despite being told, by CPS, of my having a brain tumour!

Does this really not require a JR before Court of Appeal, ECHR and public debate?

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Tel 07708586202

www.kirkflyingvet.com

mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com

maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

Extract of just what the the Welsh Assembly, seeking judicial autonomy, regularly  condone from their police force and you might be next when they want to lock you away, indefinitely, without the need for a futile trial

wanted-poster

 

chaffinch

Chaffinch Kemble.jpg

Need pilots for Cape Town and helpers to have 2nd (3rd or 4th cub finished in time)

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Does the United Kingdom have the rule of law?

Maurice has been asking this question for DECADES…

Philosophical Politics

The Magna Carta from 1215 is an early English ... The Magna Carta from 1215 is an early English form of encoded social and legal rules. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

‘Wherever law ends, tyranny begins’. –John Locke

The question seems odd, almost quixotic. In a country that prides itself on Magna Carta with a long history of common law, it seems a question that need not be asked. this seems an odd question. The common understanding is that the United States of America, which prides itself on the rule of law, inherited its faith in the rule of law from the United Kingdom (UK). Although both countries may appear to approach it differently, the question would not be raised. America was founded in the belief that the rule of law backed by judicial review, where a written constitution would be the highest law, would be the highest authority. As Harry Jaffa explained, the social contract, America’s founding, where individuals left the…

View original post 3,578 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Crunch Time for South Wales Police or HM Partnership to the Rescue

peter vaughan

After 23 years South Wales Police have ‘suddenly found my custody tape recording when accused of having been caught having a ‘garrotte’ type instruments on Prince Charles’ farm……bloody liars.

Courts, police, NHS (Wales) and many of their like minded petty politicians  have conspired all these years to cover up how they manged to have me locked up in Cardiff prison on the pretext I could not be ‘identified’.

If it had not been for the quick thinking of my ex MP, Walter Sweeney, I would still have been locked-up in Ashworth high secuturity psychiatric hospital.

AND Who on earth is expected to believe all  these lies ?

16 04 11 Tape found 16 04 19

BS Tape Order

Cardiff County Court                                                                                                            BS614169 etc

South Wales

30th April 2016

Dear Sir/Madam,

Maurice Kirk v Chief Constable of South Wales Constabulary

Purported Disclosure of 20th May 1993 Police Interview Tape

Pursuant to 15th April 2016 Court Order

  1. The claimant proposes his property, one copy or ‘working copy’ of his 20th May 1993 interview tape, made whilst in custody, be returned to him forthwith.
  1. It is of surprise to neither the claimant’s family nor his followers for this pathetic ‘one off’ gesture, twenty-three years later, of a purported ‘disclosure’ from so many still unlawfully withheld custody tapes, videos and other such relevant records hiding eye witnesses.
  1. Not just 10 years of Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons enquiry, affecting HM Privy Council Judicial Committee’s conclusions, is to be considered but it has also affected over sixty odd claimant filed Judicial Review applications at the Royal Courts of so called Justice in London.
  1. The court should now photograph the held ‘cassette’, have it DNA tested and finger printed, it is humbly suggested and full results made public.
  1. A substantive appeal is to be filed for full disclosure of what else has been ‘held back’ from the other claimant’s delayed civil actions during these past twenty-three years.
  1. What else has been distorted by our tax payer’s funded Chief Constable’s ‘in-house’ ‘Special Legal Case-Work Department’? Orders for re-painting a Lewis machine-gun and having their victim sectioned MAPPA 3/3, under 1983 Mental Health Act, emanated from right there.

Maurice J Kirk BVSc (Claimant)

NOW READ THIS CONSPIRACY PROOF OF 23 years

1754440 RL Hill Affidavit & Exhibits 1-9

1754441 A James signed Affidavit and 3 exhibits

 

Chief Constable of South Wales Police

Bridgend South Wales CF31 3SU

27th April 2016

Dear Mr Vaughan,

Hillsborough Tragedy Jury Decision and South Wales police’s Current Conduct

  1. There appears to be much media coverage as to accountability of officers in-charge of serious incidents within their community causing senior officer early retirement.
  1. An enquiry through the Freedom of Information Act, following the failure by your officers, then under a Ms Barbara Wilding, to cause her immediate resignation from office suggests, unless you can advise me otherwise, for the need of area Police Commissioner to intervene.
  1. Your 6th April 2016 FOI response letter  16 04 06 SWP FOI Response identifies apparently serious anomalies:

QUESTION 1: Did Barbara Wilding admit, by her February 2009 sworn affidavit, that all relevant disclosure had been dispatched to the Claimant also held by the Joint Legal Services and Special Legal Case Work Unit both housed in your HQ?

QUESTION 2: If not, why not and what evidence remains undisclosed?

QUESTION 3: your 6th April 2016 FOI response appears to also suggest that only those cases out sourced to external lawyers are rare and if so how many were there?

QUESTION 4: What are the terms of your insurance company in the light of your force solicitor being recommended to settle ‘out of court, in 1994, only for the Chief Constable to switch our dispute to a private law firm called Dolmans of Cardiff?

QUESTION 5: What are the terms of your insurance company to have caused my cases to be out sourced to a local private law firm free of restraints where the tax payer is concerned?

Question 6: Why then does Dolmans continue to be instructed in my ‘recent claims’ against the South Wales Police?

Question 7: Is it a coincidence that the moment Barbara Wilding resigned on full pension she had managed to register me MAPPA level 3 category 3, using unqualified Dr Tegwyn Williams, your Chief Forensic Psychiatrist for the whole of Wales, after her failed ‘machine-gun’/‘shoot to kill’ agenda collapsed to delay the case which is blocked now by HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC ?

Yours truly,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc                Copy to the new Welsh Secretary of State, Alun Cairns Esq.

 

25th April 2016

In the Cardiff County Court                  

Maurice John Kirk v South Wales Police Justice Ministry & Parole Board

Claimant’s unlawful eight month prison recall, denied both parole board hearings and medical attention, to avoid the still stayed 1CF07345 Machine Gun MAPPA3/3 ‘shoot to kill’ claim, was also reliant on Dr Tegwyn Williams & Professor Rodger Wood’s fanciful reports of ‘significant brain damage’ for 2009 police further attempt to have this claimant detained, indefinitely, in Ashworth high security psychiatric hospital

Dear Madam,

In response to your 15th April 16 email, asking for ‘further and better particulars’, may I suggest all three defendants have already been amply served with sufficient facts including claimant’s 11th August 2014 representations under Criminal Justice Act 2003 legislation and NHS (Wales) medical evidence still withheld from their victim by all three defendants.

To date the claimant is continuing to be denied proper disclosure in cases against your client and to include:

BS614159, CF101741, CF204141, 7CF07345, 9CF02983, 1CF07345, C90F012 etc

Yours truly

Maurice J Kirk BVSc (Claimant)

encl.

Parole Board claimFormPt7CountyCt2

16 04 25 C90F012 Particulars of Claim reponse

 

The following documents have been found in order to scan and print world wide just what is going on here in South Wales today the consequences of which meant the Musa Nigerian family had their 6 (7) kids successfully snatched by the Haringay Council and never to be seen again causing the CCRC  to now have had a bonfire.

A string of corrupt and very greedy lawyers, in the secret family high courts, were relied on  to prevent my attending, as a Mackenzie Friend, to get me goaled three times, (accused of child smuggling) and having the parents also goaled and then deported .

http://edition.pagesuite-professional.co.uk/launch.aspx?eid=bb28bba4-4a7e-407e-bb46-ee29655fd9e2&pnum=10&from=search&terms=maurice%20kirk&searchPage=1

11 09 17 Musas and MJK at Tottenham Police Station

Where is Favour Musa? Appealing to all UK Police Stations

The Criminal Cases Review Commission have just admitted, THIS WEEK, they also ‘no longer have copy of the 1st Dec 2011 Cardiff magistrates records’ (see above newspaper cutting) despite proof that the police had  already confiscated clerk of the court’s original notes, court exhibits and copy of any applications, during 4th May 2012 jury trial for breaching a ;restraining order’ I never received

But here in South Wales ‘inherent deceit’ conquers all especially if your boss is the mystical ‘HM Partnership’.

At that equally chaotic event the jury even wrote asking for them also but the learned judge, John Curran QC, refused for fear of the consequences.

But not before Cardiff court staff were seen here trying to cover up now sacked Barrister David Gareth Evans criminal conduct in the face of the court when switching court exhibits the next jury , of course also asked to see.

Only obtained by entering the court office in disguise  much later on release from prison and will the ring leaders were at lunch.

  1. the doctored court log
11 12 01 Cardiff Doctored Court Log

Many a UK court, since 1st Dec 2011, has ‘perused’ numerous versions of the ‘court file’ with CCRC possibly having the only copy left of the original before theirs, the lawyer toldme, last week, has been ‘spirited away’!

2. His Honour Judge Llewellyn-Jones QC’s penny worth, on 14th Nov 2011 being, most likely the one to cause the panic for I had already been in prison, whilst unconvicted, facing no charge that could carry a prison sentence!

11-12-21-cardiff-mag-log-extract

3. Now sacked CPS barrister David Gareth Evans had to quickly switch court exhibits.

Crown Prosecutors had over looked the fact that the allegations levelled at me had no custodial sentence eligibility so it was agreed by DC Charles that the barrister could slip in another charge, in front of my sister, Sabine and a packed court room fascinated observers.

I actually saw the South Wales area manger in charge, no less , in his usual waist coat and Brilcream, Mr Luigi Strinati, removing as many chairs as he could to avoid the publicity.

HM Prosecutor succeeded in saying I had  posted a note to the now sacked doctor Tegwyn Williams not with this:

wanted-poster

but with this one:

4.

switched WANTED014

while his draft ‘written all over’ by district Judge John Charles, to ‘beef it up’, the court heard was to be sent down it to me for my ‘approval’ before being typed up.

5. 11 12 01 RO CPS Draft

Please dont get me going on the 1st March 2012 farcicle  appeal, before His Honour Judge Hughes (see transcripts quietly preserved for the ECHR) with Tegwyn’s wife, Dr Hillier also of Caswell Clinic, having a right ‘set to’ to with my main witness, a Mr Eifion Edwards on his crutches, while I was not allowed, again, to even cross examine the police officer in charge in the case yet alone her Dr husband that he had not even  made a complaint nor ever wished to !!!!!!!!!!

After the jury, in May, had heard about the clerk of the court, another sacked one quickly sent out of the area participant, Mike Williams, had to hide in a court cell while the draft was ‘tendered’ to me in my cell by the liar Lee Barker with GEO Amey custody staff all looking on.

‘Looking on’, well not exactly as the police with Barbera Wilding, on the 8th June 2009 in Barry police station, had me registered as being amongst the top 5% most dangerous in the land-MAPPA 3/3 her victim to be shot. [see leaked MAPPA meeting contemporaneous notes].

6. 12 05 04 Judge Ignored Jury Note

Judge’s reply

7. 120504 Jury request rwritten down by MF

Is there a strange or familiar aroma to a veterinary surgeon wafting in your direction?

I WARNED THE CCRC within days of my being arrested in the Wood Green Crown Court, in December 2011, while trying to give  evidence in a similarly trumped- up case by greedy lawyers on the ‘gravy train’.

South Wales Police had  to have me registered in breach of an order, re harassing the now sacked Dr Tegwyn Williams, the Chief Forensic Psychiatrist for Wales, in order to further delay the 20 year on going damages claim concerning incessant police bullying.

Dr Williams did not even needed to examine his patient, in August 2009, to have me sectioned away to prison, under the 1983 Mental Health Act, as their fanciful machine-gun case was looming and already looking precarious after having to paint her a different colour to try and fool the jury.

WARNING  re ‘Gulag Card’ being played on You next……

REMEMBER, the world over-if authority are frightened of you due to your exposing their conduct, first they ignore you, then try and ridicule you and if that does not shut up they fabricate criminal charges.

For some authorities, who have too much to lose and where South Wales Police is concerned, meaning their promotion and pensions.

In my case, as with certain others who will not desist until something is corrected, the authority gunning for you will have you sectioned or in my case try having you shot.

The following Home Office document, almost totally fabricated by the South Wales Police, at least has the spelling of my name right.

MAPPA Restricted

That is what goes on here in South Wales if you are so daft an Englishman as  to have dared cross the Severn bridge in the first place and then dare to openly criticise their local court customs geared purely to protect the ‘gravy trian’ financed by the unsuspecting tax payers.

The police will have such a document for YOU and you will also know nothing about it unless you have the luck I had in Swansea prison.

The sequence of events leading up to my arrest on 20th May 1993 and subsequent incarceration in Cardiff prison was not accepted in the recent civil court hearing, in 2013, when considering damages. (judgment below)

In 1993 the police excuse was that I was ‘unidentifiable’ and that I had just been found with a possibly stolen motor bike after leaving HRH Prince Charles’ farm with a ‘garrotte’ type instrument with possible traces of blood on it.

HRH Prince Charles.jpg

The truth, unbeknown to the Cardiff magistrates, was that I was being detained by the police  for extradition to Guernsey, Channel Islands, over some unpaid parking ticket or other following the Guernsey police having told their welsh colleagues, in a similarly uncivilised part of the British Isles, that I had the habit of coming to court dressed in Nazi uniform,  apparently, but not letting on why.

Nazi loose in Guernsey

A Nazi let loose in Guernsey

In 1993  was quietly  sitting on a railing, in Cardiff, waiting for afternoon surgery to start down the road as clients arrived with their animals. As I walked off I was suddenly knocked to the ground from behind by one or two police officers neither of which had explained what their interest in me may be about.

After being transferred between a police van and Panda car, in hand cuffs, to make room for my confiscated motor bike, I was then locked up in a Cardiff police cell for about six hours with no explanation, what so ever, other than that I had been in breach of PACE, Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 s. 25 (old edition) despite no name or address being requested!

  1. This is of some importance, in that the custody record states that he was “arrested s25 PACE”. Section 25 Police and Criminal Evidence Act provides,

“(1)      Where a constable has reasonable grounds for suspecting that any offence which is not an arrestable offence has been committed or attempted, or is being committed or attempted, he may arrest the relevant person if it appears to him that service of a summons is impracticable or inappropriate because any of the general arrest conditions is satisfied.

(2)        In this section, “the relevant person” means any person whom the constable has reasonable grounds to suspect of having committed or attempted to commit the offence or of being in the course of committing or attempting it.

(3)        The general arrest conditions are

(a)        that the name of the relevant person is unknown to, and cannot be readily ascertained by, the constable;

(b)        that the constable has reasonable grounds for doubting whether a name furnished by the relevant person as his name is his real name;

(c)        that –

  • the relevant person has failed to furnish a satisfactory address for service; or
  • the constable has reasonable grounds for doubting whether an address furnished by the relevant person is a satisfactory address for service;

(emphasis supplied).

The learned judge, in the 2013 civil damages trial of ninety nine witnesses, has now reserved matters verifying his 257 page 26th October 2016 corrected judgment is also stayed until new evidence is submitted.

I have submitted, for example, a previous witness the police had locked up when he was due to give critical evidence and an air traffic controller, a Mr Jonathan Clayton,  who was protected by Cardiff airport armed police from receiving my witness summonses.

Jerry Thomas was locked up so he could not give evidence for me over the police deliberately removing the number plate of the guernsey motor bike following the lies they had to make to the magistrates in May of the same year.

30 April Ruling on witnesses

26th Oct 2015 Judgment extract re ‘garrotte’ type weapon incident subject to appeal

(Heavy type is of my making thus dividing the official judgment into segments when trying to keep continuity to understanding the facts in the case).

DRAFT for Royal Courts of Justice appeal

If there was any doubt as to who I was in Grand Avenue with a garrotte then this random bundle of the Claimant’s complaints with the police,covering the earlier incident, 2nd January 1993 ( no back lights), then where was Inspector Trigg in all this if not smack in the middle?

93 Garrotte inc008

 

STOP PRESS

Now the police have suddenly, last week,  produced my 1993 promised copy of the interview, under caution, to be subjected to forensic analysis as it is highly unlikely to be the original a copy I had ordered or police ‘working copy’!

93 05 20 interview tape

To next examine, after  this 26th Oct 2015 judgment extract, then, is the originally released redacted transcript while we all patently await the outcome, following His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC’s 15th April 2016 court order, for the tape to be played on this wordpress site later.

93 05 20 BS Garrotte Transcr pt 1

93 05 20 BS Garrotte Transcr pt 2

93 05 20 BS Garrotte Transcr pt 3

93 05 20 BS Garrotte Transcr pt 4

93 05 20 BS Garrotte Transcr pt 5

This week’s judge’s order

16 04 19 BS Tape Order

Of course it will be found now to be also redacted like the overhead Cardiff road camera filming of my being dragged out of my practice car, stationary in a queue of traffic, by a very angry PC Osbourne. Later decided to arrest me for a breath test when all knew I had been before the Recorder of Cardiff exposing the fabricated switch of court documents, a regular occurrence in Cardiff, in order to switch to a ‘breach of a restraining order’ to one of common assault and far more likely to get my name removed from the veterinary register.

Action 2 claim 11 stop at junction of Newport Road and Albany Road Cardiff 5 April 200

Please watch the camera ‘shake’ to cover up the redacted police copy video for court….

to be continued shortly…….

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

£10,000 Reward for Police Custody Records as Machine-Gun/Fabricated Medical Records Damages Claim is Blocked Again

It is seven years now that I have been watching, with quiet amusement, at the lengths to which the Welsh authorities are still prepared to stoop to prevent the facts ever becoming published  on cyberspace with their domestic news papers well and truly gagged.

As to how the then Chief Constable managed to get Dr Tegwyn Williams, himself not even qualified nor having even having examined his patient, to then agree to fabricate evidence to get me registered a MAPPA level 3 category 3 victim, on one clandestine meet in Barry police station, remains almost inconceivable!

Then with both this chief forensic psychiatrist for Wales and the HM Crown Prosecutor telling His Honour Judge Neil Bidder QC that my ‘significant brain damage’ was so serious for my current 23 year running damages claim to continue, compounded by Barbara Wilding’s dreamed up allegations, re my ‘trading in machine -guns ‘, just will be next?

BUT that was only the start of it it would now appear.

I have just served three years imprisonment because the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) still will not hand over the original ‘harassment’ conviction court records of the blackmailed NHS (Wales)m doctor’s complaint.

16 01 06 Jenny Thomas requests

This lady now admits the Commission has disposed of the missing  magistrates court records following my applications under Data Protection and Freedom of Information Acts.

It stinks, doesn’t it?

In order for me to be transferred from Cardiff prison to Ashworth high security psychiatric hospital, it was hoped indefinitely, the police had needed to further blackmail the doctor and staff at Caswell clinic to dream up new evidence as to why I was just so dangerous.

But Dr T W had the last laugh on the little bstds by writing his 19th Oct 2009 psychiatric report clearly stating Maurice was not the threat, at all, as the real danger was by the writings to him from others outside the cage. All real Enid Blyton stuff.

Yesterday I witnessed yet another Cardiff court refusing to lift the six year ‘stay’ on my machine-gun’ damages claim with immediate effect and steps to ‘strike out’ all remaining damages claims against the South Wales Police.

AND what should appear, a solicitor’s 12th April 2016 signed witness statement!

They have had the 1993 ‘garrotte instrument’ custody tape all the time withheld from HM prosecutor, no doubt, next morning in Cardiff magistrates when the police were asking to detain me in the prison until extradited to Guernsey, of all places!

I enclose a summary:

16 04 12 Fresh Ev app024

16 04 14 Claimant’s Position Statement

16 04 11 Tape found

16 04 12 SWP admit tape001

16 04 12 tape 1

16 04 12 tape

16 04 16 Cl Pos St

So if the police so mysteriously just found the 1993 ‘copy ‘ tape, my property but snatched by senior management, what else will the next judge order for disclosure?

(Almost forgot the 4th Action 7CF 07345 needed also to be quashed to hide the publicity)

16 02 05 7CF07456 4th Action Order

10 11 0 4th Action judgment

4th Action contains same police officers in other incidents such as:

10-09-28-murphy-st-1

????

£10.000 reward for police held custody records, over many years, from CCRC, HM Prison, GEOamey Custody Cervices and both Cardiff Crown and Magistrate courts.

Payment by any denomination or currency

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

South Wales Police ‘Fresh Evidence’ to be heard in court on 15th April 2016 @ 12.30pm

Fresh Evidence

Proven Criminal Conduct by Police Inspectors, Howard Davies, Andrew Rice, Steve Parry, Greaves, Nicholas Kihlberg, Collin Jones, Griffiths, Trigg, Jenner, Roe, Hill, Merrett and many others

SWP Stops Sequence.jpg

SWP Private Prosecution

NB

For ‘Dolmans’ please read as ‘Chief Constable’ and for ’Chief Constable’ please read as ‘Dolmans’

LIST OF INCIDENTS in first 33 of around 100

Action 1 claim 8 XXX

  1. Dolmans, solicitors, admit that HM Crown Prosecution Service, Stan Sofa, was ‘fully aware of his position should the Claimant, in these proceedings (Action 2 claim 5), find him in time to serve a witness summons for his evidence of ‘what really goes on in our courts’.
  1. Dolmans, at the Claimant’s March 2013 damages claim, withheld the names of at least two other police officers that had rushed to Barry magistrates’ courts, on 1st June 1998, with a Sergeant Andrew Rice after the prosecutor had been arrested for deliberately withholding the correct identity of the driver of the Claimant’s practice vehicle.
  1. Andrew Rice produced a Dolman’s prepared 21st January 2009 witness statement and sworn before His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC as having been true to the ‘best of his belief’.
  1. Paragraphs 6/7 of Mr Rice’s statement (see p5) state he denies any knowledge of incident when the clerk of the court, Miss J A Caress, with all the others in the building, must have heard the sirens of two police cars arriving with Mr Rice as officer in charge.

09 01 21 RICE Perjury

NB Inspector Rice was the Barry custody officer in charge of altering the earlier ‘Breach of the Peace’ arrest records, re Vale of the Glamorgan Show at Barry police station.

The Claimant had been, on the day, the  Honorary Veterinary Surgeon for the show.

All three hurriedly drafted cock-eyed versions, before HM Prosecutor and clerk of the court, were deliberately withheld from the three Justices of the Peace) while keeping Inspector Rice well out of it.

The Claimant’s secretary, for 8 years, Commanding Officer for Wales Royal Air Force Cadets, has typed at least a 100 arch-ever files and disappeared into France, in retirement and recuperation to be unable to be found, in time, to give at least a week of extra evidence in the trial, including what she witnessed in the Barry and Cardiff courts as case after collapsed as if skittle pins had been hit, right on target, by a ‘Zummerzet skittle ball’).

In the collapsed ‘dangerous driving’ allegation (Action 2 claim 12) the Claimant had instructed Diane to even follow police officers (eg WPC Rewbridge) into the public lavatories of Cardiff Crown Court to ensure no more conspiring occurred for the next waiting witness after the previous witness had given evidence and was released.

His Honour Judge Nicholas Cooke QC, who had the Claimant’s daughter in tears, whilst reminding her, sitting in the public gallery, of the 15 year mandatory prison term he father was facing if he did not now divulge his defences, over the ‘machine -gun’ conspiracy,to a pro-bono defence barrister mysteriously suddenly available.

The same judge had stopped this August 2000 ‘dangerous driving’ trial as the jury had just caught a Barry police inspector (name forgotten’ but in transcript), sitting in the well of the court,signalling to respective prosecuting police officers as they were being cross examined, Their jury note, just as in the 4th May 2012 first of three ‘breach of a restraining order’ trials, had been purloined from the court’s cellars, many years later and can be viewed on the downloads of his dedicated to SWP bullying, http://www.kirkflyingvet.com.

 

  1. The explicit orders from senior police management had been to secure the HM Crown Prosecution file from Mr Sofa just as he or Inspector Hill had done, in the court room, following yet another collapsed trial (Action 1 claim 2) when snatching the CPS file from a totally bemused, Mr Mundy from Scotland Yard’s anti-terrorism unit, following perjury having been committed by a Detective Constable Murphy of Cardiff airport.
  1. The then Chief Constable, Ms Barbara Wilding, by 21st January 2009, had already failed to comply to His Honour Judge Nicholas Chambers QC court order for all disclosure available had been done. She therefore had to hand in her notice to leave it for Inspector Griffiths.
  1. Her six-week late affidavit was only signed after the Claimant had to visit Dolmans and thump his fist on their table but still avoided many of the forty odd incidents cited.
  1. Within 48 hours the Claimant’ family house was surrounded by armed police officers with their helicopter hovering overhead to arrest the Claimant for ‘trading in machine guns’.
  1. She had also concocted, ‘being in possession of prohibited ammunition’, ‘proceeds of crime’ with Dolman’s very own criminal allegation, thrown in, that of, ‘threats to do criminal damage’ carrying, in all, a mandatory minimum prison sentence exceeding fifteen years.
  1. Then the Chief Constable arranged with her chief forensic psychiatrist, Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams, by subjecting him to blackmail over another Caswell Clinic doctor and a Eifion Edwards Esq whom she had also, apparently, ‘stitched up’ and gaoled. This was to have the Claimant sectioned under the 1983 Mental Act on fabricated evidence to still further delay this case.

wanted-poster

Sample of Criminal Cases Review Commission documents held (before they were switched) by arrested Crown Prosecutor, David Gareth Evans to obtain Claimant’s harassment conviction for a restraining order never ever served but later fabricated to obtain 3 years imprisonment of the victim’d police incessant bullying (Appellant to RCJ)

NOW CCRC refuse to even release following court exhibit when South Wales Police CPS switched WANTED poster and clerk of courts notes of evidence prove it.

What does one do when the conspiracy includes a few right in the heart of the Welsh judiciary seeking autonomy.

switched WANTED014.jpg

CCRC refuse to release following South Wales Police CPS switched WANTED poster and now face a Judicial review application in the next few days.

 

  1. Inspector Rice had also denied, on oath, knowledge of a Christopher Paul Ebbs/Alexander, identified in the court room and their meeting at Aust Ferry Services with a CAA representative and Bristol Crown prosecutor to discuss ongoing criminal proceedings destined for the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons disciplinary proceedings in London.
  1. Mr Ebbs/Alexander also gave evidence, on oath, during the 2013 civil damages trial.
  1. Dolmans also withheld Fairwater Police Station custody records of Mrs J Griffiths’ account of having promised an unexpurgated 29th May 1999 transcript/copy tape, of the Guernsey police with a warrant out for his arrest, ‘being in possession of ‘garrotte’ type instruments’, ‘having stolen a BMW motor bike’, his own from right outside his Cardiff veterinary surgery and being, ‘unable to be identified’.

15 11 16 Provisional Grounds for Appeal BS 614159

  1. Senior police management have since redacted that interview transcript leaving the remainder, before His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC, to be interpreted quite differently.
  1. Dolmans also withhold CAA/NATS and ATC Gloucester aerodrome records of their respective investigations following two private flights of the Claimant’s British registered aircraft, G-KIRK and G-ARSW on 4th July 1999 (Action2claim2) and in Feb 1996 (Action2Claim 8.6) when allegedly smuggling pigs out of Southern Ireland and/or flying P1 without a valid licence.

96 CAA 2nd page

  1. G-KIRK occupants had a dangerous encounter following an entirely unnecessary police HQ launched police helicopter launch, full of officers as ‘observers’, to establish whether the Claimant was the pilot. A mere call to his mobile phone, a radio message over the aircraft’s sophisticated trans world communications system, to the pilot in command, should of sufficed if the four-minute drive to his airfield from the police station was impossible

99 07 04 Police Helicopter Chase

10 06 16 CAA Psch Rpt

  1. Dolmans is also in the possession of other withheld police records including detail on Inspector Nicholas Kihlberg having given false evidence at Barry magistrates that caused a charming locum prosecutor, fortunately, to have to draft, mid trial, an alternative summons.
  1. This Claimant was expected to then alter his plea to that of ‘guilty’ to one of ‘obstructing a police officer’ instead of the charge he was currently facing, ‘failing to supply a specimen of breath,’ so it could be withdrawn.
  1. Inspector Kihlberg later committed perjury before the 2002 Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons disciplinary proceedings in order to support his January 2001 South Wales Police Inspector Collins request that the Claimant’s name be removed from the veterinary register
  1. Inspector Kihlberg, on 1st December 2000, informed the Cardiff custody officer that the Claimant’s breath smelt of intoxicants but when the definitive breath test was then carried out both readings registered zero. It then took almost three weeks before the Inspector arrived, unexpectedly, at the Claimant’s veterinary hospital, to inform him that he was being reported for ‘failing to produce a specimen of breath’.
  1. This was to make it look as if he had over looked the fact at midnight, on the day of the incident, while he hid his victim’s practice vehicle for six weeks, unlocked with Immobilon and other dangerous drugs, on some private garage open forecourt. It was only by a police officer/client tipping him off that the vehicle was eventually found.

00 12 01kilberg BD cutting

99 12 01 Killberg BT.jpg

Extract from fairwater police station recording Inspector Kihlberg’s reason of arrest.

00 12 01Kilberg BT

Result of subsequent definitive breath test.

99 12 01 kilbrg BT 3.jpg

  1. Dolmans was also withholding a 27th November 1999 PC Wood’s vehicle rectification certificate (see Action 2 claim 10) re substantive hearing requiring ninety-nine witnesses. It was written out just minutes before the Claimant’s third police ‘stop’, that day, leading to a stand-up row between the two traffic officers with one hell bent on obtaining a ‘specimen of breath’ before the Claimant could drive away. The officer in charge flatly refused but it warned the Claimant they would be waiting in some lay by as he entered Barry for bed.

99 11 27 rec tkt.jpg

  1. That did not stop the irrate officer radioing on ahead for other patrolling officers to stop the Claimant on any pretext. Within minutes he was stopped yet again on the completely erroneous excuse that the Claimant’s car was seen ‘weaving’ whist over-taking another!
  1. “There was a strong smell of intoxicants”, the Claimant recalls the officer saying, years later, just like the other Kihlbergs of this world have the habit in saying.

16 02 18 Inspectors Steve Parry Twigg The two police officers ignoring witness summonsesas the first made up the idea of ‘all vets smell of intoxicants’ and the latter was the officer no one could find to ‘identify’ so he was sent to prison until he was.

Veterinary cars do not generally ‘smell of intoxicants’ and cannot not be mistaken with routine antiseptic/disinfectants used unless the police officer has some other agenda

 

  1. Chief Inspector Jenner and Inspector Roe

Judgment extract:

  1. It is inevitable that Mr Kirk should have deep suspicion of the motives and involvement of the police in this incident. In addition the fact of formulation by Mr Roe of the charges in relation to unlawful eviction is of profound concern, but I am unable to find in favour of the claim brought, which is for wrongful arrest.
  1. It requires overarching evaluation upon all the evidence in the case whether this is evidence of a police vendetta or conspiracy against Mr Kirk, or rather the product of Mr Roe’s individual actions alone; but on the direct evidence the latter is far more likely since the police intervention was reactive to an incident where the tenant complained to them of eviction and damage to goods.

 

AnnexeEvidence of Robert Roe Nelson. Re-called Monday 29 April 2013

Start 15:40:48

Judge: Just help me if you would Mr Roe. On the last occasion when you were giving evidence, of course I have the Witness Statement that you made for the purposes of these proceedings, and amongst other things you said “I advised Mr Gafael and Miss Jenner not to attempt to re-enter the premises” and in your Witness Statement, “I categorically deny that I was involved or had knowledge of any police officer gaining access to the flat”.  You were specifically asked about Mr Gafael’s statement where he said “later that afternoon following a conversation with Sergeant Roe, he and myself gained entry to the flat and I replaced (?) etc.” and you told me “I went with Mr Gafael and his girlfriend. There was a roller shutter door. We couldn’t get in as I recall. I can say for certain I would not have gained entry. I recollect going to the flat, the roller shutter door was down. I can only recollect going on the one occasion” which is where you were being specifically asked “Well, Mr Gafael says later that afternoon you went back with him, and into the flat” and of course having looked at your statement of the time, you’ve told me that, Yes you did.

Roe: Yes, I agree Sir, that I couldn’t recollect it at the time, that I’d gone back there, but after this period of time, times have merged somewhat and uh …. I didn’t recollect it at the time going back, but I have to agree that I must have returned there. I said it in my Statement and if I’ve said it in my Statement that would have matched up with my pocket book and everything else which I don’t have access to now.

Judge: Help me with this because it may be said at the end of this case, well Goodness! if there’s ever an incident even in busy Ely which you would recall it’s one which involves the daughter of a police inspector and one for that matter where a somewhat unusual charge was placed, so it may be said if you’d ever remember something, you’d remember this one.

Roe: You tend to recollect highlights not lowlights, uhh I… it’s a very unusual charge. I must admit I don’t recollect it. I can only go on my recollection at the time and I just didn’t recollect it at all but I’m not disputing that I went over to Fairw, uhh Barry Police Station and ….

Judge: You also told me, and today, about the process and once you have the file what you do with it and you said “I sent the file in and the report goes to them, it’s for my superiors, it’s they who would send to the Local Authority or the CPS”

Roe: That’s correct Sir.

Judge: And I think somebody will be saying at the end of the case, your Statement prepared by Solicitors says on a number of occasions that you would have submitted the report to the Local Authority. Now I will just read it out so you can hear the words “Whilst I have no specific recollection I would have subsequently prepared in submitting a report to the Local Authority. I’m likely to have placed a copy of the Statement of Mr Gafael and any Statement I obtained from Miss Jenner with my report to the Local Authority” and over to paragraph 18 “after submitting a report to the Local Authority I cannot recall having any further dealings with Mr Gafael, Miss Jenner or Mr Kirk about this incident”, which looks rather different.

Roe: It looks rather different. I think it’s a bit of possibly police terminology because everything is submitted through the chain of command and if whoever is in charge of that area makes the decision if it is forwarded on. I forwarded on to the Local Authority but the Superintendent may so no, we’re not doing this, or I think this should go in this direction instead. It’s his decision that carries the weight at the end of the day and all decisions of this nature and most others and it’s just the terminology “I submitted the report to the Local Authority” but it would have been through the normal chain of command.

Judge: Yes. Also we know that a charge was prepared and made in respect of the protection against conviction and you’ve already been asked the question as to [it being (?)] pretty much out of the ordinary, you told me, absolutely out of the ordinary

Roe: Oh Yes.

Judge: And, you told me that Mr Kirk was interviewed, because we’ve established it was at Barry Police Station and on the date of the interview 3rd July 1995 that that charge is put. And, when you were asked about that on the last occasion when you gave evidence before me, I think you may remember, Mr Kirk said “Did it surprise you that I was arrested for that?” and your answer was “You wouldn’t have been. As soon as it hit the custody officer he would have said that is not an arrest able offence and it’s a matter for the Local Authority”.

Roe: Yes

Judge: Whereas it did go to interview and charge, which was out of the ordinary for you. Now I have to look forward to what may be said on either side at the end of the case about this, and it may be said, it is really rather difficult to make a mistake like that, if something so out of the usual was pursued in respect of this absolutely by way of a charge. Can you tell me more?

Roe: Yeah, the charge that we were more concerned with was the allegation of criminal damage and uh well originally theft, but uh, that wasn’t to be held at all, the theft, the criminal damage was uh if uh, was the charge that was put. The other charges were ones the Local Authority must have recommended and there must have been some other because that’s a most unusual charge that he didn’t tell us. Now unfortunately the answers may have lay in the tapes of the interview of why that was there to answer the missing question of who is the owner of the property. Um, there are, it is unusual but uh, I must say I couldn’t remember it at all.

Judge: Yes and I think I’ll ask my own questions to you. You’ve been reminded very recently indeed that in your Statement to Dolmans which you checked and signed as being the correct record of your evidence, you said very clearly “I have no recollection of arresting Mr Kirk in relation to this incident it would be most unlikely. I believe that it is unlikely that Mr Kirk was arrested in relation to this incident” and of course we know that he was.

Roe: Yes

Judge: The arrangements were made to go over from your own station to Barry, that you interviewed him in connection with, what looks like PC Roche, in respect of, we’ve touched on this before, criminal damage which may have been a pretty straight forward matter and ending up with the charge which was the most unusual matter

Roe: Yes, yes

Judge: And so the question is how can you forget that?

Roe: Well how the mind works I don’t know Sir. All I can say is I can’t recollect these charges and the subsequent events from this case because basically, it’s not like an accident where you see drama enacting in a really serious way in front of you and it sticks in the mind. This was a thing which sort of ploughed its way on and uh, it uh, there was nothing untowardly dramatic about it, and it just didn’t stick in my mind after a while.

Judge: Yes?

Roe: I, I can’t give any other reason

It was of no surprise to the Claimant, during the 2013 civil hearing, that those that had lied the most had been promoted to Inspector or more and reminding him that promotion to that level of rank in the South Wales Police Service usually required membership of their area secret society that includes devil worship.

The list is to be continued on or before ‘fresh evidence’ is induced at 15th April 2016 12.30 am Cardiff Civil Justice Centre estimated three hour hearing.

Maurice J Kirk BVSc (Claimant)

Copies to RCVS/RCJ/County Court/Dolmans/IPCC

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment