I suggest the content of this document indicates what happened in court on 4th November 2011– see facebook
HM Courts and Tribunal Service HQ Your Refs CO/4737/2014
The Ministry of Justice 2016/P1/11303
(old Home Office building)
St James Park
24th October 2016
–– LETTER BEFORE PROPOSED CLAIM FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW –
- Proposed Claim for Judicial Review re ABUSE OF PROCESSTo: Cardiff County Court Manager
- HMC>S (Wales)
- The Claimant: Maurice J Kirk
3 The defendant’s reference details
4 The details of the legal advisers, if any, dealing with this claim: May be
5 The details of the matter being challenged
South Wales Police gave instruction to Swansea prison staff to remove the claimant in his wheel chair from the prison van and then someone lied to Mr Justice Gilbart on 21st January 2015 that their MAPPA 3/3 victim was refusing to enter the prison van.
The claimant’s sister was quick to inform the welsh court that this was a lie.
Record of claimant’s complaint was applied for to be preserved, anticipating the usual conduct to delay, in that he even heard the direction over prison ‘walkie talkies’ to remove the claimant from the van thereby preventing his attending Cardiff Crown Cort sitting as The Administrative Court.
The case stated appeal was in pursuit to the over-turning of his prison sentence regarding the said police refusing to allow the claimant to have his passport returned by the Cardiff prison needed to obtain his BS614159 case records stored in France for safe keeping. Decades of police bullying and failure to investigate crimes committed against him, as in his 4th Action 7CF07345, are being unlawfully delayed due to exacerbate his medical condition.
6 The details of any interested parties include HMP Swansea, South Wales Police, HMC&TS (Wales), NHS (Wales) and GEOamey Custodial Service
7 The issues include:
Conduct contrary to Article 6 and the laws of natural justice have been breached by the prison’s actions and failure to disclose both police records of the criminal matter leading to the 21st January 2015 appeal re ‘case stated’. Failed disclosure of claimant’s custody records from both HM Prisons Swansea and Cardiff, Geoamey and HMCS&TS(Wales) court records is a common theme throughout twenty-five years of the claimant and family’s suffering.
Accentuated in this Swansea prison incident (3rd breach of purported restraining order) in that, on 1st Dec 2009 the clerk of the Cardiff magistrates court, Michael Williams, was ordered to both destroy part of the Cardiff magistrates court file and fabricate the remaining record but CCRC intervention finds the claimant had NOT even been served the restraining order.
The purported wording indicates the preventing the claimant’s publishing of the doctor’s indiscretions along with the then CPS prosecutor, in the conspiracy, to pervert the course of justice, one David Gareth Evans (photo to follow).
Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams was black-mailed by South Wales Police, while in collusion with Professor Rodger Wood of Swansea University who, himself, also contributed fabricated Caswell clinic medical records in that their victim should be sectioned to Ashworth High Security Prison, indefinitely, due to his ‘significant brain damage’.
The police purpose was to thus kill off the claimant’s formidable claims against Cardiff’s cabal culminating in the Chief Constable’s fabricated ‘machine-gun’ conspiracy in the hope in having her adversary in court, shot dead.
- The details of the action that the defendant and interested party is expected to take
Disclose court, custody and MAPPA and IRIS surveillance records etc etc.
9 ADR proposals
This doesn’t seem appropriate in this particular case, unless the other respective parties have alternative proposals.
10 The details of any information sought
With the police, having successfully getting the claimant struck off the veterinary register in 2002 on a ‘tissue of lies’ when none of which related to animals, from 2002 onwards had served on their victim no less than seven times HORT 1 traffic infringement tickets to produce his driving documents.
On each occasion the police were told, in appropriate language, the claimant had no intention, what so ever, in producing any driving documents. The claimant therefore seeks disclosure of police records concerning each of the 7/8 incidents (one outside Wales) when each HORT 1 was torn up by the claimant, often in the face of each welsh police officer to hear nothing more.
These records are also needed in the ongoing BS614159 and associated claims for damages in the Cardiff County Court and now Taunton Magistrates for the substantive trial this welsh conduct appears to have now caused leading to the claimant’s arrest and custody.
Taunton magistrates, tomorrow, may enquire as to why the claimant was never prosecuted for his actions for an ‘absolute offence’ seven times?
This Parade, Taunton, incident was immediately followed by the two Somerset police officers taking instructions from the South Wales Police and Dolmans, solicitors for them defending in the civil claims.
No seizure notice was therefore served on the claimant for his WW2 Piper Cub, trailer and car parked in The Mall the day before or again in the centre of Taunton as, it appears, the habit of Welsh police irregularities have been ordered on others in England. No HORT 1 was served on the claimant either as it was clear, following instructions from dolmans via welsh police, he is exempt of the law, the rule of law- an expression alien to the South Wales authorities.
- The details of any documents that are considered relevant and necessary
As above and a lot more.
- The address for reply and service of court documents
See Kirk Aviation business card ‘find me under the wing of the cub’
13 Proposed reply date
I would invite you to respond well before fourteen days of receipt of this letter as it is abundantly clear that this matter concerning South Wales Police withholding prison video and police contemporaneous record, to deliberately delay ‘due process’ of 24years civil proceedings, has already been brought into question by Lord Justice Sweeney this year and requires your immediate attention.
MAURICE JOHN KIRK BVSc
R U Welsh?…..then read up who first rolled hot chocolate for the first Yeatman’s (spelt wrong) Watford chocolate factory where I was lost, for a long time, imagine, at 7 years of age and where my grand dad also created ‘chocolate buttons’ and converted plain cane sugar ( glucose/fructose) into invert sugar and ‘Sunny Spread’!
Court predicted reply as this pretence of ‘not under standing’ has been a welsh tactic against the English for centuries. In this case the criminal judged refused Janet Kirk the right to take notes on my behalf as I could hear very little from behind the bullet proof glass. I had gained entry to Cardiff prison and before being arrested for being in the prison without lawful authority no less than six CCTV cameras had witnessed I had arrested prison officer Rogan for withholding my passport following a phone call from the police.
Now the RCJ has castigated those perpetuating the welsh habit, in open court, this 2nd legal challenge by me is to have the automatic quashing of the Rogan prison sentence for’ assault’.
The six cameras caught my arrest of Rogan from six angles but, of course, no welsh judge would allow disclosure of evidence for immediate acquittal of an Englishman.
No one will ever change their bitter, ‘chip on the shoulder’ against the English and with some inherent deceit is found in a few in high places.
On 26 Oct 2016 13:16, “Administrative Court Office Cardiff” <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Good afternoon Mr Kirk,
I am unable to establish what, if anything you are asking the administrative court to do. You quote numerous case numbers throughout your document but I can see nothing that specifically makes reference to asking the administrative to take action.
Can you please clarify if this was for the administrative court or whether it relates to an action in another court (i.e county court, high court, court of appeal….)
Administrative Court Office, Cardiff
Tel: 02920 376 411
From: Maurice Kirk [mailto:email@example.com] Sent: 25 October 2016 21:40 To: Cardiff County, Hearings Subject: YET ANOTHER BLOCKED CARDIFF COURT CASE CO/4737/2014
Please find another enclosed for your shredder
Maurice J Kirk BVSc
Tel 07708586202 ______________________________________________________________________
to Civil, Criminal, Administrative
26th Oct 2016
I enclose , again, for a reply, please, as the HMC&TS (Wales) appears to be continuing to give me the ‘run-around’
Your Ref: 2016/PI/11303
31st July 2016
Civil Appeals Office
Royal Courts of Justice
MAURICE JOHN KIRK BVSc v DPP
I thank you for your letter dated 13th July 2016 regarding my Appellant’s Notice and Supporting Grounds of Appeal sent to the court in this matter.
You state that the matter was referred to the Master of the Court of Appeal who directed that the court had no jurisdiction to deal with the application concerning the order of Mr. Justice Blake dated 15th April 2016, on the basis that there is no right of appeal regarding an order made under CPR Pt. 52.17(7).
However, it was made plain in my Grounds of Appeal that I considered that the Honourable Judge had in fact proceeded with my set aside application under the wrong rule, when he could and should have considered the application under CPR Pt 3.1(7) to revoke the previous order of dismissal of Mr. Justice Gilbart made on 21st January 2015.
Without prejudice to whether or not the court had jurisdiction to consider an application to appeal against Mr. Justice Blake’s order, the prohibitions in respect of appeal didn’t apply to Mr. Justice Hickinbottom’s subsequent order dated 14th June 2016.
This wasn’t an application under CPR Pt. 52.17(2), but an application to set aside Mr. Justice Blake’s previous order purportedly made under CPR Pt. 52.17(2).
Mr. Justice Hickinbottom purported to rule that he had no jurisdiction to entertain my application for set aside in respect of Mr. Justice Blake’s previous order. As can be ascertained from my supporting Grounds of Appeal, I don’t agree with that ruling, and irrespective of whether any appeal would have lain directly in respect of Mr. Justice Blake’s order, the prohibition against an appeal didn’t apply to Mr. Justice Hickinbottom’s order.
I consider that the paper ruling of the Master of the Court of Appeal was a denial of access to justice under article 6(1) ECHR as incorporated under schedule 1 of the Human Rights Act 1998 accordingly without any hearing regarding the matter under review, or hearing my submissions relating to jurisdiction etc.
I would therefore request that the matter be referred to a Lord Justice of Appeal accordingly or the matter be remitted back to the Master for further reconsideration accordingly.
I re-enclose a copy of my original Appellant’s Notice and Grounds of Appeal and the three orders of Mr. Justice Gilbart dated 21st January 2015, Mr. Justice Blake dated 15th April 2016 and Mr. Justice Hickinbottom dated 14th June 2016.
I look forward to hearing from you accordingly.
Maurice Kirk BVSc
CCRC have the Evidence of Cardiff wide corruption, re Dr Williams, MAPPA3/3 , Caswell Clinic court officials etc but appears to refuse to disclose …..’nothing new under the sun’ where the Welsh judiciary is concerned and what has happened to that outstanding arrest order ??????? Policitically embarrassing is it?