FOUND: Dr Tegwyn Williams & Dr Janis Hilliar in Canterbury New Zealand -Caswell Clinic Staff required shortly as Witnesses of Fact not Fiction


MY attempts to see, by previous invitation, my lovely MAPPA 3/3 appointed Dr Gaynor Jones at Glanrhyd Hospital, Caswell Clinic, Bridgend, psychiatrist were not only stopped, of course, by police intervention but had  they had me gaoled again,  just on release from Cardiff prison for having nearly eight months incarceration over the Cardiff Cabal’s scandalously concocted ‘machine-gun’ conspiracy, only to lock me up at Caswell Clinic awaiting my appointment!

Could JK Rowling make her new book out of this tuff?

. Even Judge Seys Llewellyn QC has blocked, for six years, my civil claim for compensation for loss of my family, profession, health, wealth and damned near my sanity!


Bunch of bloody ‘small minded’ short arsed deceitful bastards and an utter disgrace to their fellow country men and women, including miners, soldiers, factory-workers and house wives, the list is endless, who fought and slaved through two world wars and for just what? This?—Only turning to Europe, not Brexit, do we have a chance of breaking HM Partnership so distorted now, that it’s prime aim appears to be driven by greed.

I cannot even get a lawyer in the land to sue the authorities for this —I am locked up accused of attempted burglary, assault, harassment and something else, I cannot remember…..just as with the 2010  2nd alleged ‘breach of a restraining order’ malicious arrest, never served on me in the first place, for my months in both Bristol and Cardiff prisons until the South Wales Police, knowing it would lose, meant the senior police officers had to eventually had over my ‘arrest file’ to the Crown Prosecution Service who promptly dropped the case  like a ‘hot potato’.

One of the HM Prosecutors, in particular,was quick to telephone me to say the allegations were, in effect,  ‘a load of bollocks’ as Drs Tegywn Williams and Hilliar’s MG11 witness statements had been fabricated by the police on the specific instructions of Barbara Wilding , the then Chief Constable of South Wales Police.

Police records , to the CPS, contain a statement that  I had been around to the doctors’ home, in the dead of night,with 4 gallon jerry-can of Avgas ……idiots.

Coronation Street actress, Michelle Collins,  over the  Musa family scandal prevented my purported 1st December 2009 Harassment Restraining Order on me getting served due to South Wales Police being asked from Tottenham not to produce me from Cardiff prison  two days earlier as a critical witness in their fight to keep their own children being snatched.  children used as the usual ‘lawyer collateral damage scam’ to steal from the bottomless HM Treasury’s coffers.



WANTED both as witnesses to give evidence, on oath, in both HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC’s 10 ongoing 23 years of civil damages claims and various private prosecutions, currently blocked by Cardiff courts, also against the South Wales Police and /or their Agents

Wilding Wanteddsc00529lee-barker-1st-dec-2011-custody-manager

Geoamey’s custody manager, Lee Barker, on the wrong end of the handcuffs, is the key witness, again,  in the next most available court hearing to see if a Cardiff judge finally has ‘the bottle’ to order his, police and court records are disclosed.

In your dreams , Maurice.

By BARKER simply revealing  all records of 1st December 2011 harassment conviction hearing from his employer, his own diary, court file, court clerk contemporaneous files, CPS (Bristol) and the police, in my immediate ‘gate arrest’ on 1st Dec 2009 release, will the Restraining order allegations will be quashed.

Then London’s authorities will get records  then released to prove the unlawful manner in which London Family court lawyers conspired with the Welsh cabal to have me unlawfully locked up, not once, not twice but three times, in order to assist in the Musa’s six Nigerian children being successfully snatched by the Haringey Council by preventing my 28th November 2011 evidence being heard. The Crown court then blocked my having an appeal despite lodging it there and then in the building.

12 06 15 K Team at County Court

11 09 09 Musas RCJ

Musa parents at RCJ, in London, fighting a losing battle for the return of their kids.

bis 45

Fowl mouthed ex Coronation Street Michelle Collins–you need to listen to the tape!

11 09 13 Michelle Collins

And her language uttered in my face but caught both on my camera and John’s tape recorder, on her own door step was very much to do with the Musa’s eventual deportation without their children after their two vindictive 7 year prison sentences and the much ‘oiling of the wheels’ for the family courts ‘gravy train’ going quite unchecked, as usual, and not dissimilar as to what we witness in the Welsh courts.



Extract of psychiatric report written by someone neither qualified on purported August 2009 brain scans nor even had examined his MAPPA 3/3 victim before recommending the police prisoner, for alleged  ‘trading in machine-guns’, be served a s35 incarceration under the 1983 Mental Health Act that immediately prevented either his name being replaced on the veterinary register nor right to pilot any aircraft in UK air space


Professor Rodger Wood who is a major cause of this protracted injustice simply due to his plain arrogance and having got away with, so far, for his fanciful 2009 psychology reports.


A library recording this lot’s conduct on a one time veterinary surgeon having been so stupid to have crossed the Severn Bridge into that evil place, South Wales.

John Graham Esq, a star fighter for the Musas, has just obtained a passport in order to visit South Island NZ, on my behalf, to trace the exact whereabouts of the couple for two international witness summonses to be served before Christmas.

16 01 21 SWP Judgment Hearing 2

Meantime, I will have a particular pleasure in serving a lot more summonses on Professor Rodger Wood of Swansea University and his various devil-worshipping cronies,  senior past and present police officers and Crown Prosecution lawyers, all intimidated Dr Tegwyn Williams into writing that Caswell Clinic MAPPA 3/3 medical report, before His Honour Judge Neil Bidder QC on 2nd December 2009, in the first place.

One of the seen court hearings I was blocked from hearing from start until finish.

Police fabricated in order to avoid their already concocted machine-gun trial, to have me locked away for minimum of 10 years, by both Dr williams and CPS prosecution barrister, now judge, Richard Thomlow, both recommending their victim be further sectioned but this time to Ashworth high security psychiatric hospital,  IPP indefinitely,  in order to avoid any further proof of the gross police misfeasance incidents ‘going public’.

One incident, in particular, was the South Wales Police concocted  ‘garrotte’ HRH Prince Charles affair now  emerging, late, from my twenty three years of civil claims.

Police withheld that custody interview tape, to prevent my practicing veterinary surgery ever again and could reveal that no questions was were ever asked of me, at the BMW motor cycle scene or before I was assaulted by two police officers, by knocking me to the ground  before handcuffing me to be gaoled in Cardiff prison as ‘in-identifiable’!

93 05 20 Interview Tape


Then, of course, there is the documentary proof of my allegations in the next blog to be published . No wonder there is no HHJ Seys Llewllyn QC sealed order on the court lap top!

to be continued……

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Dimwit Maurice Too Slow for ‘Garrotte’ HRH Prince Charles Incident Conspiracy

Appellant’s Position Statement Cases BS614159 + 2

Dozy me I have only just found  time to put together a page from a copy of one of the court management files  copy , prepared by the police, purportedly from their choice of the claimant’s documents (court refused prosecution exhibits) stored for more than two decades in hidy holes in both France and England to finally get the lying little welshing bastards off his back by needing to take the civil action route – in a welsh court room , of all places once the jury trial promised by His Honour Judge Nicholas Chambers QC had been proved a fallacy and only put into place to delay the prosecution of the bullying police by a further five years.

Today is the first time, also, that the claimant  has had the chance to copy those cherry-picked documents released eventually from the Judge’s Chambers about two months ago withheld from the Claimant by dolmans first doctoring the prosecution exhibits before being released back to their client’s victim.

The following pages (photos) is from the triage of files of same number (incident) and put along side each other to see what the police were attempting to hide by way from being  identified as police officers cited in each of the thirty three incidents. Ninety nine witnesses in the 2013 was but 20% of the witnesses the claimant was wishing to call.

The Claimant’s 90’s memo sheet, made up mainly of his then secretary’s writing,  appeared in the court police prepared copy, the judge’s own copy but NOT in the returned copy from the police via Dolmans solicitor’s offices, in 2003, to me with  my original papers in the fifty odd lever arch files.

The police made damned sure he  did not see the content of it as it identifies those undisclosed police officers that he had been deprived of throughout the RCVS London 2004 disciplinary hearing at the Privy Council in Downing Street all implicated in ‘garrotte’ conspiracy.


Inspector Griffiths (one of same named in non-cautioned in custody interview on ‘garrotte’, I wonder, Caspar?) knew about all this and, yet alone inspector Manners, was it, not allowing me to call these witnesses, concerning my imprisonment on the excuse I could not be ‘identified’ or giving sufficient time for the Guernsey police to have the Claimant extradited (see previous blogs). Griffiths, for the new Chief Constable, Vauaghn, again still refused to produce the witness statement attempting to cover-up this as in at least three other related incidents to be included in the mid 2013  substantive civil trial before His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC.

BUT Inspector Griffiths confirmed to His Honour that Chief Constable Barbara Wilding’s six week late February 2009 personally sworn affidavit content had been correct in that full disclosure of police records had already been disclosed according to  Welsh  Law.

All routine stuff in Welsh courts  when all knew they were immune to prosecution, in any event,  so well experienced now by  a then very naïve veterinary surgeon who had originally  only crossed  the bridge from England for a two week locum tenens position.




and here is another, a court withheld exhibit of my notes of what was said in Cardiff magistrates …a pack of lies throughout-if only I had known this sort of conduct was common place in Welsh courts I would of ‘high tailed it’ back over the bridge to England!

93 06 21 garrotte mag notes.jpg


93 05 20 Interview Tape

The Claimant’s May 1993 custody interview tape ‘found’ by police in 2016! Oh surprise , surprise ……so why did it belatedly get disclosed and for the current judge to then swiftly seize it?   Don’t hold your breath for the truth as you are witnessing a police force being aloud to continue to operate unchecked ESPECIALLY now so many voted Brexit for the ill conceived Welsh judicial autonomy policed by it’s own hand picked bully boys.

So who was it so observant as to seeing on the document the name Inspector Hill and why the police had withheld the Claimant’s own document at the time of the Whitehall ‘vexatious litigant’ fairy tale story, the then Mr Burdon, had spouted such nonsense, in 2003, to HM Solicitor -General frantic to stop this civil claim.

Inspector Hill , remember, was the police officer who burst into the Barry court following the collapse of the case when Anti-Terrorism senior CPS officer from London, Mr Mundy ‘offered no evidence’, following PC Murphy having been proved a liar, while on oath, meaning the confiscated Crown Prosecutor’s file, yet again by a senior Barry police officer, had been achieved yet again in order to shred the concocted police evidence by the Chief Constable driven only by avarice in the first place.

Hill, in the full face of the court hearing, snatched that file just as Inspector Andrew Rice had when the Claimant had been accused of smuggling pigs into Ireland.

The Claimant was accused of having no car insurance when there has been no offence or evidence tendered in the law court to that effect. That had led to CPS solicitor, Stan Soffa, being arrested there and then.



Yet another police cocked-up conspiracy with the current judge again refusing even clerk of the court’s Ms Caress records of it being in the civil trial, convinced there never had been a Barry Magistrates hearing in the first place!

Any way,  Wilding had stated that in her affidavit thse two trials never happened so the judge must be right. The small matter of His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC, mid trial,  then noting that on one of the Claimant’s court records of the solicitor being arrested were both led  away in hand cuffs by Inspector Andrew Rice and then PC Killick, the latter yet another not having been allowed to give evidence court case took place.

World -widereaders fail to under stand, quite often, that  Englishmen in Welsh law courts are not always allowed access to public record of the pr0cedings as Lord Justice Thomas emphasised before Patrick Cullinane Esq and the Claimant, in RCJ, while, apparently, hiding the RCVS legal argument. the veterinary college decision  was based entirely on South Wales Police complaint of 6th January 2001 to have his name removed from the veterinary register so no revenue was available for the Claimant to employ a lawyer.

The Claimant does not forget Lord Justice Sweeny and Mr Justice’s 4th February 2016  judgment, either, citing Cardiff Crown court’s habit of not allowing an Englishman’s Mrs Kirk’s notes from being taken in a Welsh court public gallery especially as the victim usually brought in his own notes, per rectum.

Their Lordships had denied him his right to take notes in their court but also seemed to have an issue with the strange goings on , so often reported in the Principality’s law courts:



ALL relating to this admission by the ‘ being in possession of a garrotte type instrument’ charge, given without caution, arresting police officer to force solicitor:



Exactly, again, this accepted police conduct in the Welsh courts is seen in the 1st Dec 2011 District Judge John Charles ‘harassment’ conviction fiasco of similar police conspiracy, with ordering of the destruction of the court file following Dr Tegwyn Williams having been proved a liar in court whilst on oath- see police withheld records of Claimant’s ‘gate arrest’ immediately upon release from the court cells.

The Claimant was purported to have been escorted away from the doctor’s house, in the dead of night carrying five gallons of AVGAS in order to burn down Dr Tegwyn Williams and Dr Janis Hillier’s house for having given such totally conflicting psychiatric reports within the familyof one of their more affable laboratory specimens to experiment on in Glanrhyd hospital’s Caswell clinic.

And who else is there withheld from me as Claimant witnesses identified on the document but Inspector Trigg, a detective constable, PC 3961 Dilworth & PC 1798 Walker Adam and Kim , all of police staff, confirming my personal copy had been set aside from the station shredder for posting to its rightful owner.

The photo above  identifies the Claimant’s secretary’s note following police librarian, Mrs Griffiths, apologising in first promising to post the police victim’s copy of his custody tape and then having to state senior management had now over-ruled her.

‘Nothing new under the sun’ where the South Wales Police are concerned when dealing with the English.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Twice the South Wales Police have Smashed-in My Car Window for a Non Arrestable Offence & Cardiff’s Civil Trial Judge Has Ignored the Lot!

Like the proverbial ‘Shit stuck to a blanket’……No wonder too many voted for Brexit not realising their funded judiciary gravy-train is now on a down hill run, completely un checked, all the way to the bank.

Video appears to show police officer smash car window – BBC News

NOW watch my first of two incidents with South Wales Police and each Cardiff criminal  court up through the UK appeal nonsense , before my being eligible for Strasbourg, blocked this video from disclosure until too late to prevent my name being removed from the veterinary register.




WATCH THIS PACE later for my police incidents facts, chapter & verse with overhead video capturing police assault on me  as I am dragged out while stationary in a queue of Cardiff traffic. Meanwhile the cctv is recording but  the redacted police video is on my You Tube site clearly shows where the ‘splices’ were made to avoid the PC Osborne assault and then dragging me from the car where left for ages , alone, in wide open doored van in the traffic jam……..hoping I would attempt to run away… arrest  PACE procedure had even yet stated….

Action 2 Paragraph 11 stop at junction of Newport Road and Albany Road Cardiff 5 April 2000

This violent incident caught on their own CCTV shows the lengths to which the South Wales Police were prepared to go in order to delay its disclosure until after the criminal Crown Court appeal was lost so as to assist in causing the veterinary surgeon being ‘struck off the register.

The full extent of that redaction of the CCTV footage is not known, during the time PC Osbourne had smashed his way into the Appellant’s vehicle and assaulted him before then dragging him out having not been arrested.

No breath test was contemplated until instructions from senior management moving the video camera accordingly and no doubt, to try and fabricate an excuse of the actions of an officer in a flaming temper.

Their victim was left for a significant time, without handcuffs in a police van to deliberately try and provoke him to try and escape. their through the deliberately left hide open double back doors. The Appellant refused to fall for their obvious ploy to justify what had just happened and was later cleared on a negative police station definitive breath test without even an apology.

Osbourne’s excuse was either at magistrates, if there was a hearing or in Crown Court or at the Royal college that he saw some empty beer cans in the vehicle and assumed the driver was ‘over the limit’.

Appellant had been, all morning, proving the irregular conduct of Now Inspector Rice, then a sergeant in Barry police station having detained the Appellant, over night, whilst recovering from the violent assaults, first by ex inspector Howard Davies an then Security guard who had knocked him to the ground from behind, the Vale of Glamorgan Agricultural Show. He detained the Appellant, in custody over night, without either a charge or summons to allow it.

The learned trial judge in these civil proceedings had ‘struck out’ quite wrongly, part of the PC Osborne incident and the whole of the Vale of Glamorgan incident both successfully embellished upon before the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons’ 2002 Disciplinary Committee.

This civil court argument was that a conviction existed and therefore the conduct of PC Osborne is irrelevant. The Appellant submits that is wrong.

At original magistrates court all five offences were not defended in order not waste time as the appellant was very short staffed in an environment where, clearly, everything had already been settled even without evidence yet heard.

When the Appellant had brought it to their notice, again, that the MOT, insurance and ‘no seat belt’ were all easily proven as valid, by relevant documents, the latter valid by doctor’s letter, all three convictions were reversed. These, along with the CPS having already withdrawn the ‘mobile phone’ allegation, left only one.

Once the overhead video was known about the Appellant tried to again change his plea on the remaining breath test conviction but was refused, he believes unlawfully as no evidence was allowed to be heard at any time.

That video, in copy of original form, remains undisclosed along with the plethora of police audit trail, previously applied for and refused.

That single conviction remained in order for the police to have him off the road and make a written complaint to have his name removed from the veterinary register.

As for ‘using a mobile phone’ and the CPS having offered ‘no evidence’ further supports the Appellant’s claim that Osborne’s purported ‘car chase’ carried no offence nor had reasonable cause. It currently stands that the single conviction, denied, has nothing to do with the requirements of a veterinary surgeon but with Osborne making the assault on his victim, without an arrest, germane to the Appellant’s right of compensation.

EXTRACT FROM JUDGE’s PURPORTED 2015/16 JUDGMENT a year ago and still the cabal refuse to give me a sealed copy despite my travelling to The Royal Courts of Justice to try and lodge my case eventually for Strasbourg’/Action 2 Paragraph 11 stop at junction of Newport Road and Albany Road Cardiff 5 April 2000. This head of claim was subject of an application to strike out. I gave written judgment on 30 November 2010. For the reasons there set out I struck out the claim for wrongful arrest and malicious prosecution for an offence of failing to provide a specimen of breath. The other allegations remain. Those are (i) unlawful detention, namely that “the detention of the Claimant beyond 12.05 was longer than was reasonably necessary and was in breach of the provisions of the Police and Criminal Act 1984”; and (ii) malicious prosecution for offences of driving without valid insurance and MOT certificate, and failing to wear a seatbelt.

  1. The pleaded defence is that Mr Kirk was observed by PC Osbourne driving a Peugeot car in Park Place Cardiff, not wearing a seatbelt and observed to be using a mobile phone; further that when Mr Kirk’s vehicle was stopped at a junction, PC Osbourne went up to the window of the vehicle and requested him to stop, but Mr Kirk locked the doors to his car and drove off. It recites details of the arrest for refusal to provide a specimen of breath and removal to Roath Police Station; asserts that Mr Kirk’s detention was lawfully authorised by PS Roberts the custody officer, that Mr Kirk then informed PS Roberts that he would provide a specimen of breath, and arrangements were made to transport him to Rumney Police Station for a sample to be provided.

Where, exactly, did the Appellant ‘drive-off’ to when CCTV indicates stationary in a police cordoned off queue of stationary traffic?

  1. “Once at Rumney Police Station, the Claimant provided a specimen of breath which indicated an alcohol level below the legal limit. Such was the Claimant’s behaviour however, that the custody sergeant at Rumney Police Station Sergeant Pickett authorised…. Further detention so as to enable him to be assessed by a doctor as to whether he was driving whilst unfit through the consumption of drugs”. A Dr Lush arrived at 1:11am, Mr Kirk refused to allow the examination to proceed, on the grounds that Dr Lush was unable to provide written proof of his position; as a result Mr Kirk was charged with a number of matters following which he was released from custody at 2:02am. There is a denial that the police acted maliciously or without reasonable or probable cause.

Incorrect- police tried dealing their usually infallible ‘gulag card’ to incarcerate their victim in a psychiatric prison.

  1. As I set out in my judgment on preliminary issues, the stop was on 5 April 2000. In respect of the seatbelt, MOT, and no insurance prosecution, it appears from correspondence of the Crown Prosecution Service (letter of 22 May 2002) that Mr Kirk attended the CPS on 21 May 2002 to produce a valid MOT certificate, resulting in the CPS not wishing to pursue that matter further; and produced evidence of medical excuse for not wearing a seatbelt. As to the MOT certificate, it was urged for the Defendant that this, in May 2002, was the first indication that any MOT certificate had been produced; and that the production of evidence as to medical reason not to wear a seatbelt was a tacit acknowledgment that he was not wearing a seatbelt on the occasion of the incident on 5 April 2000. Thus, it was argued, there could not therefore be an absence of reasonable or proper cause to prosecute in respect of either of these matters; and the certificate of insurance that was produced appeared to be for a different vehicle.


  1. In my written judgment I noted the strong criticism expressed by His Honour Judge Jacobs of the evasive way in which Mr Kirk dealt with insurance for his various vehicles. These seemed to me powerful points, “which might very well decide the claim at the end of these proceedings after the hearing of all the evidence”. However I ruled that it was not inconsistent with the ultimate finding of the Court as a matter of record to pursue the claims and it was conceptually possible that Mr Kirk might deploy evidence and or make progress in questions of the police officers concerned, “in a way which gave more strength than now appears to his claims”, (paragraphs 113 and 114 of that judgment). I adopt in full those observations here.

A successful observation by His Honour Judge Peter Jacobs, the day he was due to get out of South Wales himself, for good it was assumed, following his own admission the Appellant’s insurance head office had again been bothered, this time by the CPS on behalf of his own Honour’s request.

What the learned criminal judge, however, did not make public was that he had, before the hearing, first asked the Cardiff Crown Court manager to plead with the Appellant’s good nature to explain the web ‘weaved’ by the police, to deceive.

The Appellant was NOT legally obliged to but for nearly an hour during his busy surgery time he answered the clerk’s questions proving the reasoning behind why this veterinary surgeon needed to use so many vehicles and insurance companies.

As this trial has now proved the police had pestered his agent and insurance company directly, knowing it would only be a matter of time before the motorist was refused insurance cover.

Why, also, there had to be so many practice vehicles appearing to be foreign and registered in such names including, ‘Onest ‘Arry, a retired Guernsey car dealer, G Mallory Esq, possibly the first climber to have conquered Everest, Whilbur Smith and numerous members, past and present, of the Kirk family.

  1. This was a morning when Mr Kirk had left the Crown Court “where I was spending most days, at the height of police harassment” and says that he was aware that he was again being followed by the police. In his statements he says that whilst stationary at a traffic jam he was attacked and dragged out of his car by PC Osbourne who promptly arrested him and, Mr Kirk is insistent, nonetheless left the door of the police van wide open in the hope that he would abscond and give the police yet more material to pursue against him.


  1. Whilst Mr Kirk says he did not ever refuse a breath test at the scene, that is a matter which is not open to me to consider, in the light of the binding conviction for failing to give a breath test and for the reasons set out in my judgment on preliminary issues of November 2010.

The learned civil court judge, it is submitted, erred in law again on this recurring issue as he was only too aware of the police psychiatrist’s conduct, as he had sat in judgement, (failed ‘strike out’ of the Claimant’s multi thousand damages claim against Dr Tegwyn Williams for falsifying his vitim’s psychiatric report when not having the knowledge/qualifications, in the first place, to have written it.

Police had blackmailed Williams to have the Appellant locked away, if not shot, for life and MAPPA registered should neither the fabricated police ‘machine gun’ case, for a mandatory minimum 10 year imprisonment or the Ashworth high security psychiatric hospital application, for life, also failed.

It is submitted that the overarching format of this incessant harassment in these and other similarly vivid particulars of claims should of been taken into consideration rather than ‘striking out’ such an incident so brilliantly exposed on film,as the Oborne would be, with disclosure, despite senior management intervention to leave the best ‘footage’ on their Bridgend HQ’s ‘cutting room’ floor.

  1. Mr Kirk says, “Later I was taken to two police stations, knocked about, refused custody videos be retained they leaving, as they do, my car full of drugs, unlocked with the window down…. A negative breath test caused further detention for a drug test and waiting for doctor. I was very frightened, as harassment had lately become dangerous and irrational” (witness statement 19 June 2009 paragraphs 692-693).


  1. Mr Kirk sets particular store on a video from a street camera which shows that it took only moments from the police van pulling up behind him to his window being smashed and him being removed very forcibly from his car. Objection was taken to me viewing this video, on the basis that judgement on preliminary issues barred Mr Kirk from complaining of the lawfulness of the arrest. I ruled that I should look at this evidence, in case it cast light on those allegations which remain. It shows that it is only some six seconds, from the police van pulling up behind Mr Kirk’s car at the junction of Newport Road and Albany Road, to his car window being smashed and his immediate forcible removal from the car.


  1. Mr Kirk relied on a witness statement prepared, according to its own date, on 6 April 2000 (in other words, the next day) in which he states that he was taken to Roath Police Station and made it clear that he was quite happy to do a breath test, and was transferred to Rumney Police Station where he gave two zero readings on their breath machine. “I told the Sergeant that they had to release me or they would be sued for false imprisonment. He said I believe you are under the influence of drugs and you will have to be detained and be examined by a doctor and if you refuse you will be detained in custody for Court tomorrow’ about an hour and a half later a doctor came to the cell and explained his position. I asked if I was legally obliged to be examined? He didn’t know, so I demanded the Sergeant. The Sergeant admitted that there was not a legal obligation but it would be recorded as a refusal. I asked to be examined without further delay”…. The doctor was unable or refused to produce any form of identification before the medical examination and appeared to leave the police station in haste! I was then detained a further half an hour for finger prints, DNA test and photographs”.


  1. As to the assertion that Mr Kirk was taken to two police stations “[and] knocked about….”, (statement of 19 June 2009) he made no suggestion of assault at the police station or stations in the statement he made the next day,


  1. The police evidence of what led to the stop is primarily that of PC 1215 Osbourne, with some contribution from PC 3689 Price, each of whom gave evidence at trial before me. PC Osbourne and PC Price were in a marked police vehicle in Park Place Cardiff and Mr Kirk was driving the other way. PC Osbourne says that the driver appeared not to be wearing a seatbelt and also to be using a mobile phone and so he turned and followed Mr Kirk’s vehicle. At a junction, Mr Kirk’s vehicle stopped at the lights, PC Price left the police vehicle and knocked on the passenger window of Mr Kirk’s car; PC Osbourne says the driver turned and looked at PC Price but then looked away, PC Price then went to the driver’s window and knocked, the driver looked at him and then locked the door driving off on the green light.


  1. There are handwritten “notes made at scene of incident/arrest” timed at 11:25 to 11:35 (namely some 25 minutes after the stop), on which there is a date stamp April 5 00 and a time stamp 11:35. PC Price has endorsed this with “I have read the above notes and they are a true account of the events that took place” (A2/5.79-80). According to this the Peugeot moved off and the police vehicle followed, PC Osbourne on his own account flashing the headlights on the police van and sounding two-tone horns in an effort to attract his attention and to get him to stop “so I then used my personal police radio to inform other police units we were following a vehicle which was refusing to stop”. Mr Kirk’s car came to a halt in lane three at the junction of Newport Road and Albany Road because of stationary traffic at the traffic lights.


  1. A marked police van stationed itself to block the movement of all vehicles in Newport Road including Mr Kirk, “at this point I left my vehicle and went to the drivers door of the Peugeot, it was still locked, I knocked on the window and Mr Kirk ignored me, I continued to indicate to him and ask him to open the door. He refused to do so. I then went to the rear passenger door, on the drivers side, this door was also locked so I then used my PR24 baton and I smashed the rear passenger window. I smashed the rear window so that Mr Kirk would not be sprayed with glass. I then reached into the vehicle and unlocked the drivers door by lifting the button on the door…. Having opened the drivers door of the Peugeot I removed him from the vehicle. I cannot recall if by now he had his seatbelt on.” (witness statement PC Osbourne, A2/5.22-23 paragraphs 7-11, emphasis supplied).


  1. Turning first to Mr Kirk’s evidence at trial, some of it was inherently unlikely. He was unaware that the police were trying to attract his attention with a view to stopping his vehicle. This is improbable. He said that something ‘caught his attention’, which he accepted might have been PC Price knocking on his car; and that he could see the “middle part of a person” behind his car whom he ‘assumed had something to do with’ the police van he saw directly behind him, In cross examination he told me that slightly further down the road, (it would appear at the next junction) he took a photograph of a (Volvo) car which he thought was a police car. This is consistent only with Mr Kirk being aware that the police were following him and trying to stop him.


  1. There is no allegation in the pleadings of assault at the police station thereafter but, in the light of Mr Kirk’s overarching case of being targeted and harassed by the police in South Wales, it is appropriate to deal with it.


  1. It was to Roath Police Station that Mr Kirk was taken first of all. The custody sergeant at Roath Police Station was PS Roberts. During his cross examination of PS Roberts, Mr Kirk suggested that he had there been assaulted by being dragged about by his feet while he was sitting on the floor. In cross examination, Mr Kirk told me that he was pulled around on the floor of his cell, “I’m not fingering Osbourne, ’cos I can’t remember”.


  1. A little later, Mr Kirk said that he did not exclude Osbourne or Price from being involved, or present. However he did not suggest either to PC Osbourne or to PC Price that they had taken part in, or might have taken part in, or were present when assault on him took place.


  1. Mr Kirk was not certain of whether the alleged assault was before or after his presentation to the custody sergeant. The custody record at Roath contains no complaint of assault, and Mr Kirk told me he could not remember whether he told the custody sergeant. There is no record of complaint at the succeeding Rumney Police Station, and Mr Kirk thought it very unlikely that he would have reported it there.


  1. A video, which was played to the court (it seemed to me as much at the insistence of the Defendant as Mr Kirk), shows Mr Kirk in the corridor to the custody desk, coming through with PC Osbourne and PC Price. The video footage was played at trial a number of times and I have given it the closest attention. The custody sergeant is seen behind his desk, throughout the relevant period, at the other end of the corridor in which Mr Kirk was waiting, behind his desk. Mr Kirk thought that his mistreatment occurred in a cell where he had to sit on the floor because there was no seating.


  1. The witness statement of Mr Roberts, since retired, is not lengthy. It records arrival at 11:27 and processing, at 11:31 Mr Kirk was read his rights and supplied with copies of Notice of Rights, refused to provide the custody sergeant with details; “He was concerned about animals in his vehicle and I allowed him to use the telephone to make arrangements for the animals. I have recorded that Mr Kirk was angry and refused to co-operate. He in fact sat on the floor crossed his arms and legs and refused to speak to me”. It was at 11:43 that Mr Kirk informed him that he would provide a specimen of breath so that at 11:44 Mr Kirk was transferred to Rumney Police Station. This is as set out in the contemporaneous custody record (A2/5.49-50). Thus in total, Mr Kirk was detained at Roath Police Station for some 17 minutes.


  1. PS Roberts gave evidence, which I have no reason to doubt, that the only cell which does not have a bench or seat within it was the “drunk” cell, which had a camera trained on it continuously which could be viewed by the custody sergeant. As to the video shown in court, other than for snatches of a few seconds, the only officers who were at Mr Kirk’s end of the corridor were PC Osbourne and PC Price and they remain in sight whether by the top of their hands or a hand or hands resting against a wall; if so, it is difficult to see how they could have assaulted, pulled, or knocked Mr Kirk about.


  1. The custody record, at Rumney police station, at 12:19 hours, records Mr Kirk as sitting on the floor as he was being booked in. Mr Kirk at trial said that this was because his ankle was hurting. (I note that the video footage displays timing at all times four minutes out from the custody record but the video footage is complete and nothing turns on this). Otherwise, it would appear to anyone else to be unusual behaviour.


  1. In my judgment the most striking fact of all is that in a statement made by him the very next day, Mr Kirk makes no complaint or mention of an assault or being dragged around the floor of a cell at Roath Police Station.


  1. As I have indicated, at Roath Police Station Mr Kirk was insistently sitting on the floor and in general refusing to speak to those with custody of him. Such was not contested by him in his oral evidence. It is, unless known to be because of pain or injury, unusual behaviour. It is of some interest that it is at 11:40, 13 minutes after his arrival that the log records, “DP has been identified as Mr Maurice Kirk”. At another time, the footage shows him periodically pacing around the custody unit, with his hands in his pockets.


  1. The custody log shows transfer of Mr Kirk being accepted at Rumney Police Station at 11:54. The custody sergeant was PS 2244 Pickett. There, at 13:05, the log records an intoximeter showing a lowest reading of nil (in fact both readings were nil) and “he has refused to sign the copy provided by the machine”. At 12:07, it records “In view of the above, I’m not happy with the DP’s demeanour. I am therefore authorising further detention for the DP to be assessed by a doctor re being unfit through drugs”; and at 12:19, “DP searched. Whilst property being booked in DP insisted on sitting on the floor”.


  1. The witness statement dated 16 January 2003 by Mr Pickett (since retired) is effectively a recital of the entries in the custody record. In oral evidence, he said that his view (that Mr Kirk might be under the influence of drugs) was based on entries by the other custody sergeant of being aggressive, refusing to answer questions or speak, “the fact that he is zero on the intoxylator indeed he might be intoxicated from some other cause. The entry at 12:19 hours of “sitting on the floor” added to the unusual behaviour.


  1. Mr Kirk asked him whether there was any obligation on his own part to answer any questions in custody. Mr Pickett agreed that there was not, but said that the impression that he might be under the influence of drugs came from the fact that he was refusing to answer questions, and the change in demeanour to being angry after being allowed to use the telephone. He said that it was not based purely on that entry (11:32 “I have allowed to use the phone to arrange for the animals. DP is angry and refuses to co-operate”) but “on my views when you came into custody, when you came into custody refusing to answer, refusing to co-operate in any form indicated to me that there may be other reasons why you were acting like that other than alcohol”.


  1. I myself rephrased a question from Mr Kirk, who had become too agitated to formulate an intelligible question, as follows: “Q. I think Mr Kirk is really asking this question. There’s nothing unusual about people refusing to answer questions at the police station when they are in custody? A. No, as I say everyone has a right not to answer the questions, but taken in total with the demeanour and the previous entries whilst he was in Roath I determined that there may be other reasons why he was behaving like that”.


A little later, Mr Kirk asked,


“Q. Right, point out where there is indication on the custody record that I was under the influence of drugs…. A. Uh the fact that you drove off from the officers.

  1. Sorry? A. The fact that you drove off from the officers as they tried to speak to you.
  2. Where, where was that? A. Circumstances for arrest and grounds for detention…. Your first page….. I can only base my answers on what’s on the custody record. I wasn’t present at the time.
  3. But you must have had a conversation with Osbourne…. About it…. About drugs… the possibility? A. No, I formed the opinion based on, purely on what was written on the custody record and having seen you before.
  4. So it was your idea? A. Yes.
  5. Are you sure about that? A. Yes….. because if there had been any evidence given to me by the officer I would have made a record in the custody record.

“Q. Right, point out where there is indication on the custody record that I was under the influence of drugs…. A. Uh the fact that you drove off from the officers.

  1. Sorry? A. The fact that you drove off from the officers as they tried to speak to you.
  2. Where, where was that? A. Circumstances for arrest and grounds for detention…. Your first page….. I can only base my answers on what’s on the custody record. I wasn’t present at the time.
  3. But you must have had a conversation with Osbourne…. About it…. About drugs… the possibility? A. No I formed the opinion based on, purely on what was written on the custody record and having seen you before.
  4. So it was your idea? A. Yes.
  5. Are you sure about that? A. Yes….. because if there had been any evidence given to me by the officer I would have made a record in the custody record. “


These citations are illustrations from a cross examination which repeated essentially the same questions and elicited the same answers, at some length.


  1. A doctor was called to examine Mr Kirk. A Dr Lush attended, who gave witness statement and oral evidence before me and who wrote a contemporaneous note at 13:00 hours, “Initially seen in cell to request examination for fitness to drive. Possibly under influence of drugs – breathalyser – ve. He had discussion with custody sergeant regarding legality of such request. He came to medical room and refused to speak unless I can provide written identification of my position. Coherent speech. No overt injury/ataxia. Returned to cell by custody officer” (emphasis supplied). Mr Kirk did not contest the evidence of Dr Lush.



  1. For completeness I record that I also received witness statement and oral evidence from retired PS Mahony who took over as custody sergeant for the shift from 14:00 hours to 22:00 hours. Mr Mahony had little present recollection of the event, but was the author of entries in the custody record at 13:33, “Change of custody officer: I have taken over custody duties and have enquired into the circumstances of detention and consider that they continue to be necessary. I have visited the detained person in the cell/detention room and find the detained person to be fit for detention. I have reminded the detained person of all rights and entitlements” and at 13:37 in the log records the charges placed with the unusual entries at 13:41 “the DP refused to sign charges unless he saw the length of fingers on the officers hand (sic, emphasis supplied)”, and at 13:52 “The DP is un-cooperative in taking of his fingerprints and force may have to be used. He has been warned of this”. At 13:59 he was bailed to the Magistrates Court.


  1. Self evidently, the assessment was, once seen by Dr Lush, that Mr Kirk was not under the influence of drugs and was fit to drive. Thus Mr Kirk was released some 22 minutes after Dr Lush wrote that the detained person refused to be examined because he could not provide written proof of his position.


  1. The charges were presented for hearing before the Cardiff Magistrates Court on 11 April 2000. Mr Kirk in fact pleaded guilty to all of the offences, (save for not having proper control of the vehicle; no evidence was offered in respect of that). He was subsequently sentenced in respect of the charges to which he had pleaded guilty (see A2/6.139-146). He then attempted to vacate his guilty pleas and enter not guilty pleas. In judgment on preliminary issues I recorded fully the sequence of appeals, application for judicial review to the single judge, and renewed application to the Administrative Court, and appeal with refusal of Mr Kirk’s attempts to resile from his plea of guilty.


  1. With remarkable persistence, Mr Kirk wrote to Cardiff Magistrates Court asking it to re-open his pleas of guilty to other offences, and on 20 May 2002 District Judge Watkins decided to set aside the conviction for no insurance and allowed Mr Kirk to change his plea with a not guilty verdict being entered. It is clear that the court was told that the prosecution accepted that Mr Kirk had valid insurance on the day of his offence. I refer, as elsewhere, to the caustic comments of His Honour Judge Jacobs about Mr Kirk’s insurance habits while driving vehicles registered in the name of others, and the late production, time and again, of evidence of insurance.


A basic necessity, now proved, of survival if one is so foolish to as to practice veterinary surgery and try to raise a family in a place like South Wales-see paragraph 862

  1. In relation to the offences of no seatbelt, no MOT certificate, and no insurance, I adopt that which I set out in the judgment on preliminary issues (including the fact that Mr Kirk later produced medical evidence of a reason not wear a seat belt, from which it is reasonable to infer that he was not wearing a seat belt when first seen by PC Osbourne; and Mr Kirk’s unusual habits of insurance which are calculated to induce suspicion of driving without insurance. In relation to these offences, nothing has emerged since that judgment which properly supports any case of malicious prosecution.


  1. I have borne in mind throughout the street camera video footage which shows Mr Kirk being dragged from his car. It demonstrates that it took only 6 or 7 seconds from the moment when PC Osbourne alighted from his own police vehicle to the time that he dragged Mr Kirk from the car. I found PC Osbourne’s explanations for this, and his evidence in general, profoundly unimpressive. I do not accept that he pursued the measured and rational process which he alleges in his witness statement (namely of going to the driver’s door, still locked, knocking on the window, Mr Kirk ignoring him, he “continuing” to indicate to Mr Kirk and asking him to open the door and only then going to the rear passenger door to smash the rear passenger window).


  1. On the other hand, it was reasonable for PC Osbourne to conclude that Mr Kirk had deliberately not responded to PC Price, first at his passenger window, and then at the driver’s window, at the previous location when Mr Kirk had come to a stop.


  1. I am bound by the finding of an offence of refusing to give a specimen of breath at the roadside (of which Mr Kirk remains convicted). In April 2000 PC Osbourne was a uniformed patrol officer stationed at Cardiff Central Police Station. Mr Kirk was no slave to authority or conventional restrictions. I find it strongly probable that Mr Kirk was not wearing a seatbelt (see above) and plausible that Mr Kirk was using a mobile phone when driving, as PC Osbourne says he was.


  1. It is natural for Mr Kirk to associate this stop with the fact that he had just returned from the Crown Court, dealing with matters of complaint against police actions. However there is no positive evidence of prior acquaintance between PC Osbourne and Mr Kirk (or between PC Price the accompanying officer and Mr Kirk). Once there was a refusal of breath specimen at the roadside, and given that such a finding binds me, there was lawful reason to arrest Mr Kirk and take him to the police station. Yet again, I have considered whether the facts of the immediate incident as I have found them are susceptible to proper inference of a wider picture that it was by way of targeting or malicious selection of him for police attention or treatment that Mr Kirk was stopped, and/or dealt with thereafter, on this date. However I find it strongly probable that he was wearing no seat belt, and probable that he was using a mobile phone as the police officers Price and Osbourne stated, so that there would be nothing particularly unusual in the police vehicle following him; conversely there was something unusual in the fact that the driver deliberately ignored PC Price knocking at his window, (since I am satisfied that Mr Kirk did ignore him knowing that it was a police officer), and that he then drove off. The sorry fact is that by now Mr Kirk’s view of the police was so bitter that he was prone (if he could) to ignore what any police officer said to him or did; and thereby he was prone to bring more suspicion upon himself by the individual police officers who encountered him.


  1. In rushing to Mr Kirk’s car to break a window and drag Mr Kirk out PC Osbourne was acting angrily, and it may be intemperately, but that is not the same as acting in pursuit of a conspiracy to target and inconvenience Mr Kirk, at least as evidenced directly in respect of this occasion.


  1. It scarcely needs to be stated that it follows, from the conviction of failure to give a breath test at the roadside which stands and which binds me, that there was lawful reason to detain Mr Kirk until the zero reading at Rumney Police Station at 12:05. Has it been shown to be lawful to detain him longer than that?


  1. Mr Kirk is certainly in a mould of his own, with his own logic and view of things. He clearly did not, in evidence or at trial generally, regard it as odd that he should sit on the floor in the custody reception area, or odd that he should refuse to be examined by a doctor unless the doctor produced written identification that he was a doctor. Others are likely to have found these behaviours more than odd. Custody officers unacquainted with Mr Kirk, (and I find on the balance of probabilities that these custody officers were unacquainted with Mr Kirk) may not know or see through the eccentricity. The behaviours were likely to be viewed as odd by custody officers both at Roath police station and at Rumney police station. On the authorities cited to me, a police officer including a custody sergeant (and in particular the custody sergeant at Rumney police station), is entitled to rely upon what he or she has been told by another officer whether that information is conveyed directly, or contained in documents, such as the custody record.


  1. In the end I have concluded that it is not implausible that the circumstances related by the arresting officer, with the (true) account of Mr Kirk driving on and not stopping despite the police approaching him, and his distinctly unusual behaviour at the police stations, would in the presence of a zero alcohol reading reinforce a suspicion that he may have been driving under the influence of another substance. Within 22 minutes of the doctor’s attendance he was discharged from custody. I consider that the Defendant has shown that it was lawful to detain him during the period they did.

 2nd Inspector Nicholas Khilberg incident …..smashing his way into my car, by using his truncheon




 TO BE continued




Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Twice Police Smashed My Car Window to Violently Drag Me Out for Non arrestable Offences

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Welsh Assembly is Hell-Bent on Blocking My Machine-Gun Appeal getting to The Royal Courts of Justice

2nd hand machine-gun FOR SALE –excellent for rabbit-shooting or vermin extermination


My statistics of South Wales Police bullying culture that has ruined my life and many others.


The Current Cardiff Judge His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC

HHJ Seys llewellyn QC


Cardiff’s GEOamey Custodial Services manager,  Lee Baker, also WANTED for perjury


Only four boxes left of my court files for suing the police , back in the late 90s, after chaotic HM Treasury ‘Vexatious Litigant’ Investigation ended in quite an opposite conclusion when a babble of barristers, in Whitehall, upon examining each court action brought my success had been around 90% in my favour through the civil courts.

SWP court docs 19th July all files

Dr Tegwyn Williams, the police blackmailed Chief forensic Psychiatrist for Wales, is also wanted to simply correct and clarify my medical records as his reports, one to have me sectioned without even a clinical examination, continue to pay havoc in my life.


The thoroughly arrogant and dishonest Professor Rodger Wood of Swansea University


My Aug 2016 brain-scan BEFORE Barbara Wilding’s  Application to have me incarcerated in Ashworth for an indefinite period


My 1st December 2009 English brain scan medical report deliberately withheld from His Honour Judge Bidder QC despite my ex MP, Walter Sweeney, having already faxed it to the Cardiff Crown Court. This was BEFORE  Crown Prosecutor , Richard Thomlow , during my forced absence in the cells below trying to beat the door down,  informed the learned judge in the court room with Tegwyn Williams that  I was  suffering from a possible brain tumour but no one has ever told me.



My brain-scan AFTER my Barry police station registration  as MAPPA 3/3 to be amongst  the top 5% most dangerous in the UK

Norman Scarth Esq being congratulated for his belief that ‘truth will prevail’

11 06 28 Contempt Appeal & Norman MF 2

The current Chief Constable, Mr Vaughn & with Barbara also worried about is fat pension

peter vaughan

Part of my 200 odd arch-lever files I have on the South Wales Police’s years of nefarious activity back from a safe hiding place in Brittany.

13 02 12 files from France

Adrian Oliver Dolmans

Part of the Musa family, police reporting in, concerning their snatched six children by Haringey Council


Wilding Wanted

And now for something completely different


as the wee cub needs a little ‘kirkyfing’ if she has any hope of making it all the way to Cape Town yet alone the planned landing on Horse Guards Parade, Central London, on 12th October 2016.fro a pre-flight party


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Application for Arrests of Lee Barker Cardiff Court’s GEOamey Custody Manager, Court Clerk Michael Williams, Prosecutors Jackie Seals & D Gareth Evans & Police Inspector Rice or I Will

                      Stop Press

Cardiff’s Cabal  Will  Stop at Nothing to Hide the Publicity of 23 years of Police Bullying

14th September 2016

Dear Sir/Madam,

I acknowledge receipt of your email, received in this office on 13th September 2016

Your email was referred to the Master of the Court of Appeal who has asked me to inform you that the court has not previously seen this letter. Please resend your Appellant’s Notice and the orders appealed.


Registry Team Civil Appeals Office

Royal Courts of Justice




Civil Appeals Office
Royal Courts of Justice
The Strand
13th September 2016
Dear Sir,

Cardiff Court’s Refusal to Process my Legal Aid Application

1   I have now established what lies at the bottom of this scandalous nonsense.
2. What is needed are Dr Tegwyn Williams’ 2013 lawyers from both London and Christchurch, New Zealand, as both he and his wife, Dr Janis Hillier, were  attempting to prevent my 4th police prosecution knowing it was an ‘abuse of process’, in itself and contrary to the 1997 Harassment Act.
Until I have established as to the  whereabouts of both, as the police refuse to tell me, re the 2nd jury trial, I will remain in some difficulties, as they say.
3. What is most urgent, of course, is obtaining a high court order from the RCJ concerning Cardiff County Court refusing to disclose related documents:
These include:
i)) Police 2013 ‘corrected’ ‘draft ‘ judgment for Maurice Kirk v South Wales Police from 23 year running civil damages claim
ii) the purported HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC  ‘sealed’ ‘approved’ BS614159 +2 judgment
iii) The relevant Cardiff County and Cardiff Magistrate’s court logs and
iv)  copy of my court  withheld prosecution exhibits also for the RCJ Civil Appeals Office three time attempted lodged appeal.


   LEE BARKER GEOamey Custody Manager

 £100,000 Reward for Perjury Convictions

My reward for more up to date photographs of these individuals all wanted on perjury charges thanks to the help of the Criminal Cases Review Commission and private investigators. I will now double the previous cash for the information as to their current whereabouts in order for private summonses can be aerved on each of them.

Tel me 24/7 on +447708586202 or email

LEE BARKER on the wrong end of ‘ses menottes’


Lee Barker taken just before my 2011 string of arrests, on the usual fabricated excuses, when knowing I am extremely unlikely in getting bail following the Chief Constable’s 8th June clandestine meeting with Caswell Clinic staff to have me registered MAPPA category 3 level 3 victim in order to have me shot at moment of ‘witness statement exchange’ ordered by his Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC

HHJ Seys llewellyn QC



Restraining Order Never Served

A purported copy of the 1st December 2011 Dr Tegwyn Williams Restraining Order was first seen by Maurice Kirk only after he had been arrested at Wood Green Crown Court, London, on or about 12th December 2011 after having given evidence for the Musa Nigerian family who had had their six children snatched by the Haringey Council in the notoriously wicked UK family court system and set up purely for the lawyer theft of tax-payers’ money.


…….and remarkably similar to the one identified as ‘Exhibit One’ at 4th May 2012 Cardiff Crown Court also with the police station photocopier scratch right down the middle of it

Both South Wales Police and HM Crown Prosecution Service (Wales) have refused to explain to the past three juries or their victim as to the origins of  the date stamp on prosecution Exhibit One indicating a date after the alleged offence was committed or disclose the data relating to the hand written reference numbers also on the exhibit



So why were they both allowed to say somethings quite different, on oath, before a jury?

David Gareth Evans of Park Place Chambers, Cardiff, was the Crown Prosecutor who knows that the only thing shown to me on 1st Dec 2011, in  Cardiff magistrates cells, was a part district judge CPS hand written typed draft of a restraining order later admitted, on oath in Bristol Crown Court, after I had to arrest him tro get him in the box.

He quickly quit his job, as with most of the liars or was ‘pushed’, following the subsequent jury trial that even featured in the Sun newspaper.

In this, the first of three jury trials, so far, on the Dr Tegwyn Williams/MAPPA/ machine-gun saga to block my civil damages trials Judge Curran  deliberately refused the jury sight of relevant public records, despite their numerous requests after I was dragged  out of the court to prevent my trying to retrieve my defence court exhibits yet to be vacuated.

To be vacuated because in Welsh courts police victims are regularly not allowed their defence papers with them in any court proceedings unless, of course, they are lucky enough to be out on bail at the time.

Similarly, in Wales, prisoners in their criminal courts,when having to act as a ‘litigant in person’ behind bullet-proof glass for their protection and hearing precious little, are not allowed to have contemporaneous notes being taken of the evidence, on their behalf, even from their own family as was the case before District Judge John Charles for fear of immediate imprisonment.



yet to be for medical attention or to allow me to know of their jury notes to him.


Michael Williams, then the clerk of the court, has since shredded and/or altered court logs and his contemporaneous notes of ridiculous evidence to obtain the ‘ultra vires’ harassment conviction before the  very dishonest District Judge John Charles later , too late for the CCRC enquiry, just to add to Cardiff Cabals almost daily nefarious activities, to protect Barbara Wilding’s healthy pension. He has done a runner from Wales as well!

Both Drs Tegwyn Williams and his wife, Dr Janis Hillyer, quickly disappeared to South Island, New Zealand or was also ‘pushed’.  Anyone, incidentally, needing the doctor’s address or their solictor’s telephone number who tried to prevent my last arrest in order to attempt to prevent the same prosecution of me on the thirs ‘breach of a restraining order please feel free and contact me before police succeed, again, in preventing my hospital internal examinations as they did while I was in Swansea prison and when I was released on ‘licence’.



This complete idiot, villain Professor Rodger Wood of Swansea University, had completely hood-winked Tegwyn into believing I had brain damage and possible brain tumour  from being ‘a long term drinking partner of the actor Oliver Reed’ and I had flown solo to Australia in a WW2 General Patten Piper Cub without even a map!

He went on to re write and back date the original information he had circulated around Caswell clinic my brain scan, machine-gun acquittal needing no defence what so ever when he was told by the police that their victim was not even told by courts, MAPPA, Welsh doctors or prisons he had a suspect brain tumour as the bloody lot were all in on the act.

This was then repeated to Judge Bidder QC —see 2nd Dec 2009 full transcript


Barbara Wilding at South Wales Police HQ jumped on this idiot’s late input, if not previously paid handsomely for it, in order to have me locked away for life, without the need, therefore, of the imminent machine-gun trial only carrying a 10 year mandatory prison sentence.

The subsequent secret MAPPA meeting therefore planned for my demise in Ashworth high security psychiatric hospital, instead, to stop her half dozen or so civil damages claims, by now, having to be defended. All claims identify South Wales Police malicious conduct on the English having been so stupid to have crossed either Severn Bridge into Wales in the first place.

HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC.s repeated refusal to recuse himself relates to the unusual content of his draft judgment as opposed to the facts of the case and why he is determined, it would also appear, never to allow any appeal to reach an English court in The Strand or for my 1CF 03361 machine-gun damages claim, that lost me my family, health, wealth and right to fly aircraft, for years, and practice veterinary surgery.

The illegally blocked machine-gun claim has been equally illegally blocked by welsh courts for six years and my 4th Action for even longer—–evil spineless little shysters

Summary of Machine-Gun Conspiracy




16 08 26 Particulars of 4th Claim 7CF07345



The Chief Constable knew  that she had to have the antique Lewis machine -gun painted a different colour to fool the jury and introduce the fictitious ‘ foxy;’ as the under-cover policeman who has pretended to by her off me when first making contact on the telephone to the wrong person, my then wife.

The prosecution exhibit Gareth Evans tried to switch, mid trial, to  get past Charles failed but years later seized by the police from the Cardiff Crown Court office when a relation of mine had attempted to apply for what on earth was before the original court in the first place and needed there and then during the middle of the  March 2014 3rd ‘breach’ of a restraining order trial.

The good news for their victim, in November 2011, following the harassment conviction in his absence, contrary to the clear law on the subject, was that he was offered release  by the panicing district judge who had ‘ screwed up ‘ for Dolmans master plan.

Released, two weeks too early for what Dolmans (Chief Constables private lawyers in civil claims) had arranged with Charles, CPS (Wales) and the rest of the Cardiff’s  cabal meant no restraining order had even been typed out yet alone ready to serve despite their victim’s opportunity to leave the stench of the place at around 2pm. These documents are only served on the recipient of a restraining order once the prison is about to release I’m when he is a Litigant in Person like I am usually forced to be,

Their victim had refused to leave his cell, for a few hours, after the odour in the air had exceeded the norm as no paperwork had been disclosed to him as explanation for his too early release.

He was not falling for that very old police trick as they were waiting outside the court building for the subsequent ‘gate arrest’ for stitched up Musa Nigerian six children snatched by the Haringey Council.

11 09 17 Musas and MJK at Tottenham Police Station

It had been a  ‘long stop’ police precaution to prolong their victim’s incarceration under any pretext and jumped on the MUSA case, so needed by the London prosecution for their victims evidence not to be heard to blow a family court conspiracy plainly  for the oodles of cash and for the parents NOT to get their children back, again for the oodles of unchecked taxpayers ‘ cash.

The Cardiff prison simply stopped his attending to give vital evidence in the hearing, two days before and blocked any subsequent hearing in the Crown court later.

This South Wales Police refusing their victims attending court is the norm in Wales if the tax payers’ completely unchecked ‘gravy train’ is to keep chugging on to the bank.

You do not serve restraining orders in court cells on a prisoner due to go back in prison that same night.  Papers are served on their release.That is why Barker had to pretend I had received a court served order before 3pm  and one of the five GEO custody boys, at 5pm., while dragging me, flat on the floor, the length of the corridor in the custody suite to the exit, desperately trying to stuff it in my sock having failed to get it into my trouser pocket.

It was all Sabine’s fault, I joke,  for inviting so many people from across the UK  with my usual faithful Welsh Mackenzie Friends, sister  and a bemused Jeff Matthews to personally witness, ‘what really goes on in our UK law courts’.

You should of been there that day, late November 2011, behind the bullet-proof glass with me, you would hear practically nothing of the proceedings but did that matter as a ring-side seat you would of had to watch  the spectacle .

The  shock and panic on the face of the South Wales Administrator of all their courts, Mr Spengazi, Strinati or Spinatti?, some name like that, come rushing down from his office suite  into the court in his pin stripe suit and waste coat to  frantically, but personally, grab as many chairs as he could in the public gallery and removed them to prevent there being any more of the general public to witness the farce.

It is the ‘Gulag Card’ of which many will be dealt, with gay abandon, if Brexit gets its way.

Listen to the court tape of this magistrates caper on

No wonder Lord Justice Thomas refused my being ever allowed to practice veterinary surgery again by having the RCJ court tape quickly corrupted.

BUT  I had taken a tea-totaller, no smoking , no swearing, gentleman from the Emerald Isle  witness His lordship by sitting quietly in the back of the court as was his habit.

Similarly, just as a Jeffrey Matthews crept into the public library so many years later unnoticed, at the end of the last 3rd or was it 4th ‘breach of a restraining order trial by now, originating, in law, as a blatant ‘abuse of process’ had it occurred in any English court room.


That is why Judge Rowland, around April 2014, quashed the Tegwyn Williams restraining order ‘as an abuse of process’ as both the CPS had now agreed it was ‘ridiculous’ as both lawyers had investigated the law in the case and new evidence in the last to jury trials that the 1997 Harassment Act made provision for this in that the  fabricated medical records and talk of a brain tumour, when never ever informing their victim, had been orchestrated under the duress of both Professor Rodger Wood and Barbara Wilding.

Whilst  designated as a hater of devil-worshippers and to be actually  locked away in Ashworth, purely to stop the cocked-up machine-gun case, was a crime that had been committed but not by Maurice John Kirk.

One cannot be convicted for a section 2 harassment offence if all the police victim was trying to do was to either ‘detect’ or ‘prevent crime’.

Remember, boys and girls of The Principality, there is only one ‘truth’ unless I am stupid?

This document below was one of many such taken to an English court while I was trying to get private prosecutions on some thirty odd in the South Wales establishment only to be told, with obvious sympathy , no English magistrate’s court can process an alleged crime in a foreign country, like Wales, despite their  being of the same jurisdiction—so Brexit lovers, in England, beware as what was first trialled in South Wales and partly succeeded then a ‘gulag card’ may now just be waiting to be dealt on YOU

10 09 28 Murphy st (1)

Inspector Rice tried to set this up  by goading me to retrieving the car from inside Penarth police station compound as all at police HQ were now frantic for having found out the name of my new insurance company to ‘lean on’ not to renew my cover.

In another of the hundred or so police incidents, when I had to arrest another Welsh Crown Prosecutor, a Mr Stan Sofa for having deliberately hidden the clear speed-trap photograph of another, not me, who should been prosecuted for speeding, it  was why it had to be  Inspector Andrew Rice again, it appears, that had rushed from Barry police station with all  sirens  blaring on both police vehicles stuffed with fellow officers.

They had burst into the court room and, instead of taking the CPS solicitor to his cell, instead, he confiscated the CPS file in front of us all to make sure it never  reached any enquiry either in London  or by an outside police force.

Exactly as he or Sergeant Hall, was it, did in another equally police concocted ‘smuggling pigs into Ireland’ alleged incident leaving the collapsed trial in the usual shambles and no apologies to me for the inconvenience.

The apparently perverse verdict of Judge Seys Llewellyn QC is of particular note, in the above random examples that involve  Rice, shortly to be arrested, in that he remarked, mid civil trial that, despite the utter commotion with court staff fleeing the room I had even written down in my 200 odd prison battered arch leaver files, the very collar number of Inspector Rice as he was pinching property again.

Rice, of course, denied he knew anything about the CPS arrest incident, on oath, just as he had to be most singularly the one to have my name removed from the veterinary register, as custody sergeant that night, fiddling the custody records never to allow never them going before the presiding magistrates. He had had three versions of the ‘complaint’ over an alleged  Breach of the Peace with which CPS lawyer, Jackie Seals and ex Inspector Howard Davies had conspired in.

Why oh why, with well over twenty veterinary practice vehicles in strange registrations, such as Amy Johnson, Amelia Earhart, Buzz Aldrin and Joseph F Bloggins, was a DVLI enquiry or prosecution, on their own?  Why I was I never quizzed on it even over twenty four years of police bullying and weeks through the substantive trial?–It stinks, does not?

Part of my appealhere, currently being blocked for the Royal Courts of Justice, features the Sofa arrest:  Draft ‘grounds’


Seven Times Welsh Prisons have Maliciously Stopped My Attending Courts as A Litigant in Person- Standard Blackmail to make their Victim have to confide in a local  Lawyer 

SENT 2nd time on 10th sept 2016 owing to no response

Civil Appeals Office

Royal Courts of Justice

London WC2A 2LL

Your Ref:   2016/PI/11303

My Ref. CO/4737/2014

31stJuly 2016

Dear Sir


I thank you for your letter dated 13th July 2016 regarding my Appellant’s Notice and Supporting Grounds of Appeal sent to the court in this matter.

You state that the matter was referred to the Master of the Court of Appeal who directed that the court had no jurisdiction to deal with the application concerning the order of Mr. Justice Blake dated 15th April 2016, on the basis that there is no right of appeal regarding an order made under CPR Pt. 52.17(7).

However, it was made plain in my Grounds of Appeal that I considered that the Honourable Judge had in fact proceeded with my set aside application under the wrong rule, when he could and should have considered the application under CPR Pt 3.1(7) to revoke the previous order of dismissal of Mr. Justice Gilbart made on 21st January 2015.

Without prejudice to whether or not the court had jurisdiction to consider an application to appeal against Mr. Justice Blake’s order, the prohibitions in respect of appeal didn’t apply to Mr. Justice Hickinbottom’s subsequent order dated 14th June 2016.

This wasn’t an application under CPR Pt. 52.17(2), but an application to set aside Mr. Justice Blake’s previous order purportedly made under CPR Pt. 52.17(2).

Mr. Justice Hickinbottom purported to rule that he had no jurisdiction to entertain my application for set aside in respect of Mr. Justice Blake’s previous order. As can be ascertained from my supporting Grounds of Appeal, I don’t agree with that ruling, and irrespective of whether any appeal would have lain directly in respect of Mr. Justice Blake’s order, the prohibition against an appeal didn’t apply to Mr. Justice Hickinbottom’s order.

I consider that the paper ruling of the Master of the Court of Appeal was a denial of access to justice under article 6(1) ECHR as incorporated under schedule 1 of the Human Rights Act 1998 accordingly without any hearing regarding the matter under review, or hearing my submissions relating to jurisdiction etc.

I would therefore request that the matter be referred to a Lord Justice of Appeal accordingly or the matter be remitted back to the Master for further reconsideration accordingly.

I re-enclose a copy of my original Appellant’s Notice and Grounds of Appeal and the three orders of Mr. Justice Gilbart dated 21st January 2015, Mr. Justice Blake dated 15th April 2016 and Mr. Justice Hickinbottom dated 14th June 2016.

I look forward to hearing from you accordingly.

Yours faithfully

Maurice Kirk BVSc


UK’s judiciary is just all one big confidence -trick into fooling the general public ‘what really goes on in our law courts’ is both legal and morally sound!…..dream on.


Duty Inspector,

Somerset and Avon Police



11th September 2016

Dear Sir/Madam,

I would like to make an appointment to lay information as a criminal complaint concerning the South Wales Police’s most recent nefarious activities designed, as we all know, in order to frustrate both my civil actions against them, including the fabrication of my allegedly ‘trading in machine guns’ nonsense, now being deliberately being delayed by both Cardiff’s civil and criminal courts.

Litigation long before I employed my Bristol lawyers, over 20 years ago, to get the Welsh police finally ‘off my back’, actually included my arrest and a failed prosecution, of course, whilst I was simply conducting a flight as a commercial pilot from Taunton via Cardiff airport to Dublin.

On another occasion on a private flight, again from Taunton and this time to Northern Ireland with my then wife, I was detained by Welsh police resulting in the substantial damage to a police vehicle for obstructing my perfectly lawful flight. The UK tax payer not the Welsh police, as usual, was made to foot the bill for the launching of at least one RAF Hawker Hunter out of RAF Brawdy that day.

There are a number of other Welsh police incidents, you may think bizarre and too many to list other than in a court room but I have been told, again, your officers have again out knocking on doors looking for me, this time told it appeared be about a Dr Tegwyn Williams again

I have spent time telephoning and visited the police station but failed to find out what it is about.

Before our proposed appointment could someone explain why I appear to being followed by your helicopter despite my visits and calls to reduce the fuel bill. This is exactly what happened in South Wales putting my terrified passenger in the aircraft at serious risk as no radio contact was made and it flew within 50 ft of my wing all contrary to statute.


I have spent the best part of two days a week ago trying to find from your police station what on earth it is all about now even needing visits to places of other people ‘s residences when there is a perfectly good telephone somewhere in your building to just ring me


Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Tel 07708586202


(No reply, as  yet, from my Taunton MP, I notice. Is this going to be a repeat, I wonder, as to what I experienced from our country’s current Secretary of State for Wales?)

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Two Applications to Quash illegally STOPPED Machine-Gun Damages Claim & NHS (Wales) Caswell Clinic Investigation


MJK letters of complaint to the General Medical Council & Alun Cairns MP




Crown Prosecution Service (Wales) has deliberately withheld, for three jury trials and for the original utter nonsense harassment conviction many important defence witnesses and this letter, below, which is why CPS and police so fervently opposed, every time, my bail applications to keep me locked up in Welsh prisons unable to properly prepare for either civil ligation or criminal hearings, the whole purpose of the Barbara Wilding MAPPA Machine-gun conspiracy in the first place.

Police make me in top 5% most dangerous in the country as a MAPPA 3/3 victim for Ministry of Justice’s printed libel, below, just to influence each jury, Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons designed purely to successfully oppose my bail applications as exactly was the case to have me locked up for months prior to my machine-gun acquittal Judge/CPS/police conspiracy when no defence evidence was even tendered.





Chief Clerk,
Cardiff Magistrates Court

9th September 2016

Dear Sir/Madam,

Application to Quash 1st Dec 2011 Dr Tegwyn Williams Restraining Order


I now understand from both HM Crown Prosecution Service and Criminal Cases Review Commission, following the disclosure of new evidence, some of which was referred to by Dr Tegwyn William’s solicitor to the police some time ago without my knowing about it, I have plausible argument that the purported ‘restraining order’, never served on me in the first place, should be quashed.

As I am also to go abroad I would be grateful for an early date in order that I may attend in person.

Yours Faithfully,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc
Tel 07708586202



Initial Statement by Eifion Edwards.

Court Appointed lawyer does not have the evidence that is essential for the cross examination of Dr Tegwyn Williams.

1. Time is needed to organise evidence in support of the defendant Mr M J Kirk that is essential for court appointed lawyer to use in the cross examination of Dr Tegwyn Williams to expose Dr TW unusual dishonesty and malice.

2. On 1 May 2012, the day before trial, the Crown Court told me they had they had asked Apex Chambers to provide Counsel as the Court appointed lawyer, but no decisions had been taken on who would act. I need to provide very complex papers and there is now no time.

3. I believe to proceed without my evidence that is needed to cross examine Dr TW would bring the administration of justice into disrepute.

4. I ask that proceedings switch to focus on a re-trial of the original conviction of December 2011 & 1& 2 March 2012 because my evidence has been hidden from the Courts for their fair deliberations – despite my writing to the Crown Prosecution Service and attending both Magistrates Court and the appeal at the Crown Court. I was prevented from giving evidence on both occasions by improper ‘goings on’.

5. The matter is so complex and lengthy I merely give the direction of my evidence at this time, and ask for time to submit more.

The direction of my evidence.

6. I can confirm that Mr Kirk telephoned me on his release in December 2011 and when I pointedly asked him to detail the latest bail conditions or restraining order that he was under, that he was unaware of any restraining order.

7. As in my attached letter to Mr M Curry Head of Unit at Cardiff CPS and a much fuller letter to Keith Starmer, Director of Public Prosecutions I can explain why Mr Kirks actions are reasonable and lawful and that not only should Mr Kirk not be convicted, but that Mr Kirk should not even be prosecuted.

8. I wish to explain why I believe Dr TW and parties are dishonest and malicious.

Dr TW’s breach of a High Court Order restraining Dr TW from obstructing my care and harassing me – and how Dr TW misleads the Crown Court on 1 March 2012

9. Please see where in the transcript of 1 March 2012 Dr TW tries to imply he has no one else objecting to his actions, when I have had take Dr TW to the High Court over his endless dishonesty and now seemingly a breach of his undertaking to the High Court. Dr TW and parties have interfered in Cardiff NHS very much to try to stop me complaining to the General Medical Council about him.

10. I have had disclosure of Caswell Clinic papers to confirm that a multi agency committee has been meeting based around Caswell clinic to prevent anyone lawfully complaining to the General Medical Council about Dr T Williams. Before Mr Kirk’s alleged harassment charges took place, the committee detail how they aim to get those who complain about Dr T Williams imprisoned for many years. My and Mr Kirk’s initials are on the heading of the emails that organise the agenda of these meetings. (I have no criminal convictions/cautions by 55 years and am a well qualified professional man.)

11. The Caswell clinic multi agency committee seems to have unreasonable influence and control over the Courts, CPS and Mr Kirk’s custody at Prison, to seemingly pervert justice.

12. I am presently organising the complaints to the GMC for both Mr Kirk and myself. The GMC have confirmed that the GMC legal team have approved a larger than usual investigation will occur regards my complaint. I now start to explain the GMC about what Dr T Williams does wrong regards Mr Kirk:-

a) Maliciously denying Mr Kirk access to Caswell Clinic when the staff team of the Caswell had decided in writing that they wanted to build a therapeutic relationship with Mr Kirk. Yet when Mr Kirk would approach Caswell for staff to have opportunity to draw him in, Dr T W maliciously and dishonesty called the police etc.

b) I believe that Dr T W did this because Dr T W cannot discuss the close detail of clinical reports on Mr Kirk because the reports are seemingly malicious and unusually dishonest. Dr TW calls police and falsely alleges harassment to try to cover up exceptional wrongdoing of in bad faith trying to deny Mr Kirk’s liberty indefinitely.

c) That Dr T W refuses to receive questions and information to clarify or correct his reports. Dr T W refused to make a statement to explain himself in civil proceedings, to imply guilt.

Mr Justice Beatson saw an extract of what I believe Dr TW ‘made up’ about Mr Kirk.

13. The evidence I wish Dr T W to be cross examined on is seemingly reliable of genuine concern. When I shared what I knew with Mr Justice Beatson on 19 January 2012 sitting at Cardiff Administrative Court he said in Judgement:-

“Some of the allegations that the Claimant (myself) makes about CPS policy, if supported by evidence, would be very serious. Today he has given me a swatch of papers about Mr Maurice Kirk, a litigant who is well-known in these courts. Mr Edwards relies on what he says is evidence that it was said that Mr Kirk was mentally unfit and had brain damage, which a summary of Mr Kirk’s record based on a surgery home visit report shows was not true.”

14. I wish explain why Mr Kirk has not yet had a fair trial to explore what Mr Justice Beatson describes as “very serious” and “a ….report shows was not true”. Yet both the Crown Prosecutor and the Court appointed lawyer withheld my evidence from the appeal at Cardiff Crown Court. There are also more complex reasons why my evidence was withheld from the Court(s). I believe the Courts need to now switch to a re-trial and for the “first time” to explore how Dr T W and parties do wrong to Mr Kirk.

15. As for example is in the attached one page extract of recent papers lodged at the High Court 18 April 2012, I am asking the High Court to refer the abuse of power (such as in Mr Kirk’s case) and where there is no Remedy for that abuse, to the Supreme Court.

Eifion Edwards 1 May 2012








Where the ‘buck’ finally stops:

Just one of the many versions of redacted/re-written police and court records one tends to find in Cardiff after decades of my life wasted by trying to simply practice veterinary surgery in South Wales that has still not managed to fiddle judicial autonomy and its own police force.


Withheld court log from 4th May 2012 1st ‘breach of a restraining order’

Even the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) have been gagged.

Application for Access to Court Files


AND what about my confiscated custody interview tape re ‘garrotte type instrument’ used on HRH Prince Charles’ farm?

This part of the tape transcript to get me goaled as ‘unidentifiable’-later, when I can find it!

I take a pin and random sample ‘grounds’ for appeal on one from 33 incidents in dispute



Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment